They thought it was all bunk and that it was all political to keep the masses at bay. Prove me wrong little britches.tell me right now then how they came to that decision and what they thought about every single individual aspect of the case.
They thought it was all bunk and that it was all political to keep the masses at bay. Prove me wrong little britches.tell me right now then how they came to that decision and what they thought about every single individual aspect of the case.
Don't forget you're gun.i'm headed out tonight to follow some weed thieves!
i aggree my facts in the case are limited. but i know trayvon was walking. and zimmerman decided it was his fucking responsibility
to be like hey you there young black man ( or just young man if he wasnt black cuz again race doesnt matter). come explain yourself to me for i am superior to you. and trayvon responded, exactly like i would have, like , why the fuck have you been following me and what the hell doo you want. which zimmerman (thinking he had any sort of right to do
so because he self appointed himself community security queer?) responded HALT you are definitely up to something. and trayvon was like im not explaining my self to you and kept walking.
zimmerman than prolly was like " no in the name of community law HALT NOW for i community officur duphus say so" which TM prolly just ignored or said shut up too.
which worked up lil zimmerman to the point of prolly grabbing TM and being like let me call this(nothing) in to the police. where a fight ensued @ the 100% fault of the dueche
bag who never had Right nor reason to follow the individual in the first place. than when the 17 yr old was whooping his ass he pulled his gun and shot him.
your right... go zimmerman you brave honorable man. you fucking piece of shit you should have rotted behind bars forever.
to anyone arguing with me i dont have animosity towards you guys its solely towards zimmerman and the situation. i could give a fuck. all you guys in ur moms basement are
entitled to ur opinions.
How do you identify your watch guy? Does he have a hat?I generally avoid assaulting the neighborhood watch guy. Nothing good can come of it.
Buck, "Yes, officer, that 10 year old stole my pot a few months ago so I followed him to the park and he beat the shit out of me (points to the obvious stain on his pants) and left me here crying. It was self defense." Puzzled, the officer tells him to go home and clean himself up. "Stupid drunk shit himself, I ain't puttin' him in the back of my car" he mutters to himself.hell, i don't even have a gun. my self defense case will be a slam dunk!
No, it will be shitty no matter where he goes.Only if he moves to Alaska or some place of that nature.
I totally agree. Trayvan was a niggardly boy and a closet tranny with a jewelery collection. But my social situation scripts tell me there are those who havent read the dictionary who would beat me down for not having my same humor.how did the post in anyway portray aspergers ...boy
Clearly, Zimmerman was incapable of "easily taken him out". So, not murdered. You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own law.Do I think trayvon was thr best kid ever no. he had some issues and diid wrong foings however there's no reason to be shot point blank by some trigger happy wanna be cop who couldve easily taken him out without deadly force. He didnt deserve to be murdered YES MURDERED!!!!!!
You got one fact right. + rep 4 u.but i know trayvon was walking.
zimm had a much longer history of violence, martin had no record or history of violence whatsoever.Martins character and history of thug like behavior goes towards circumstantial evidence as well and the testimony of martin doing the beating was much stronger. Lets not forget the testimony regarding martins racism which goes towards motive.
cant tell if this post is on my side or not lolI totally agree. Trayvan was a niggardly boy and a closet tranny with a jewelery collection. But my social situation scripts tell me there are those who havent read the dictionary who would beat me down for not having my same humor.
one less thief to worry about!Buck, "Yes, officer, that 10 year old stole my pot a few months ago so I followed him to the park and he beat the shit out of me (points to the obvious stain on his pants) and left me here crying. It was self defense." Puzzled, the officer tells him to go him and clean himself up. "Stupid drunk shit himself, I ain't puttin' him in the back of my car" he mutters to himself.
This is why manslaughter charge fits because TM death was death of a minor via culpable negligence..GZ was negligent in informing TM that he had a gun to begin with..this i agree with. you have a gun and intend to use it... you let tht shit be known. pull that gun out and say look motherfucker. i
do not wish to fight you. however if you would like to proceed id b happy to cap u. end of story
You speak as tho a person is obliged to meekly go to his death just because his possible killer is a 17 year old. No one's applauding Zimmerman, tho some are happy to see that public opinion is not going to be the new standard of justice.beardo bro.... dont defend zimmerman. hes a fat mexican whos ego was hurt when a 17 yr old fucking KID was whooping his fuckin ass so he killed him like a pussy and now hes free. ya lets applaude that fucking guy....NOTTT . not a good day for justice system... a bad day... to add to all the other fucking bad days its had.
ah, you're not familiar with red trying to cover up his inability to spell simple words like "hazard" by using homophones here and there.**Your**
hehehe
there's as much evidence for a beating as there is for self defense, smarty.
trial's over, you can stop repeating the baseless.
third in a row: trial's over, you can stop repeating your baseless assumptions. there's no evidence that martin assaulted zimm, it is just as consistent with martin defending himself.
I was under the same impression until I spent a few minutes on MSNBC and CNN. They have a few "experts" talking about the verdict and both panels hit on this topic. There were technically TWO verdicts handed down by this jury. The obvious one is the not guilty for Zimmerman. The second is a guilty verdict of assault for Trayvon. The two cannot be separated according to the experts. For Z to have used justifiable force in self defense, TM has to be guilty of assault. They went so far as to say if he had survived the altercation, he would be charged. Bear in mind, both of these panels and the hosts are OBVIOUSLY in TM's corner. Even saying it's a double slap in the face for TM's family that the jury found their son guilty of assault.They thought that the People of FL failed to prove it was not self defense.