a cheap swipe at some decade old theory that no one is talking about anymore disguised as an apology. cute.
that totally invalidates everything else that has been said and makes roy spencer a model scientist who totally doesn't believe in creationism over evolution.
yep.
you still have not gone beyond
"Roy Spencer has Religious Views and is thus unqualified to speak on any matter, regardless of other qualifications"
you have failed to argue any reason beyond your ad hominem attacks, and your blind hatred for his religious opinion to discredit his theories, his methodologies, or his conclusions.
and the "theory" was never a theory, NO science had been done to determine who much CO2 jungles consume for plant growth Vs how much they produce through wildlife (especially termites and fungi) and bacterial decomposition.
the NOTION which you generously call a "theory" was actually an advertising campaign to build support for the Rainforest Action Network, and several Eco-Fringe groups, like Earth First.
it was as devoid of scientific rigor as "Silent Spring", "The Population Bomb" and The Great Garbage Crisis of the early 80's
in other words, the authors pulled it out of their asses.
but like all great Eco-Loon notions, when it turns out to be BULLSHIT, they pretend it never existed, however, one pancake breakfast at the local church, temple mosque or synagoggue, and any scientist who disagrees with the eco-nauts is forever labeled a "religious nutcase"
and calm down.
