mehrific
Well-Known Member
Any experiences with this company. http://www.lushledlighting.com/
hyroot you must post this comment to everyone who looks at buying a cheapo chinese rebrand. I must admit but, your right!go with Area51, hans led, apache tech, cree globes, or diy...
Chinese or not I checked there grows out and the buds look dank. Not all Chinese made leds are bad. Looking to get some name brand ones as soon as I get done testing out these 1200w (720w) 5w panels I picked up. If they get the job done might stick with them till they burn oute-shine crap rebranded . don't bother. They lie about parts and performance.. not even worth it.
go with Area51, hans led, apache tech, cree globes, or diy...
Chinese or not I checked there grows out and the buds look dank. Not all Chinese made leds are bad. Looking to get some name brand ones as soon as I get done testing out these 1200w (720w) 5w panels I picked up. If they get the job done might stick with them till they burn out
Yes I agree that they may measure up to the high quality panels, my problem is for HOW LONG though? That's my issues with the Chinese panels, too many failures just on this site alone! Yeah warranties are nice but I don't even want to deal with taking it down/packaging it/sending it back/waiting........./putting it back up.....lolIm gonna have to agree with that, some Chinese LED's are not terrible and actually measure up to their name brand counterparts at times. I know I don't contribute a lot here, but I've been in the aquarium trade for a long time and have seen the LED craze play out on that side of the world. Some are bad, some are the same thing as the name brand minus a sticker or two.
Bahahahaha ooohhh bahahaha ahhhh bahahaFarmerjohn420 is using them so they must be good......
Tags420, you are the one spreading lies and manipulating people with bull shit! All the lights you promote are junk, you are not fooling anyone.That kushington farms has good pics but more than half of it is hps. that they don't show.
Whatever dude. Last time lush tried to talk to me about their lights on a forum they got banned in 2days for foolish and clearly false claims, so I hope you came with some quantified proof. I talk to you guys at every cup. Your a joke and so is your light. Glad you finally stepped up to secondary lenses, but your output is still low. Sub isn't using it yet, just talking about where to hang his free light...non of the spots are in a flower room. And then farmerjohn was only lighting up his walk ways with them.Tags420, you are the one spreading lies and manipulating people with bull shit! All the lights you promote are junk, you are not fooling anyone.
For starters, I have not ran nor touched a HID in over a year. There was a testing phase where I ran LED vs HPS but that time has long past. No need to use any HID when you are using the correct LED.
Second, HPS is full of IR light that makes a par meter increase, that's not as beneficial as you think. The lights I use push that par energy on the UV side and so it's far more beneficial than HPS's par light. There are a lot of people using these over a 4x4 like I do, others over a 3x3. It's a matter of preference and how much light you want to provide for each sq ft. Either way, not only are breeders like Swerve and Subcool using Lush but so are large grow operations. The only reason they use these lights is because they work, bottom line, that it. So why are they not using the Apache Tech or Indagro? You got it, because they do not.
To clear the air, Lush brand lights are not e-shine LED's. They are their own brand, sourced their own parts, and sought out their own manufacturing. Lush also warranties their own product in the Michigan. You don't have to worry about being without a light or them failing so quickly like the other brands. They spent 3 years engineering these lights and perfecting them so they will last and out perform all other lights. The only people that don't like Lush are the ones trying to push other brand LED's.
What kind of statement is this....??? I dont like Lush because of their diode claims...The only people that don't like Lush are the ones trying to push other brand LED's.
Wow, I am very interested in Lush Lighting Farmer, you have seemed to of convinced me with your great people skills.Tags420, you are the one spreading lies and manipulating people with bull shit! All the lights you promote are junk, you are not fooling anyone.
For starters, I have not ran nor touched a HID in over a year. There was a testing phase where I ran LED vs HPS but that time has long past. No need to use any HID when you are using the correct LED.
Second, HPS is full of IR light that makes a par meter increase, that's not as beneficial as you think. The lights I use push that par energy on the UV side and so it's far more beneficial than HPS's par light. There are a lot of people using these over a 4x4 like I do, others over a 3x3. It's a matter of preference and how much light you want to provide for each sq ft. Either way, not only are breeders like Swerve and Subcool using Lush but so are large grow operations. The only reason they use these lights is because they work, bottom line, that it. So why are they not using the Apache Tech or Indagro? You got it, because they do not.
To clear the air, Lush brand lights are not e-shine LED's. They are their own brand, sourced their own parts, and sought out their own manufacturing. Lush also warranties their own product in the Michigan. You don't have to worry about being without a light or them failing so quickly like the other brands. They spent 3 years engineering these lights and perfecting them so they will last and out perform all other lights. The only people that don't like Lush are the ones trying to push other brand LED's.
[h=4]LED Type[/h] | [h=4]Error [%] for Apogee Quantum Sensor[/h] | |
Cool White | -4.2 | |
Neutral White | -6.1 | |
Warm White | -9.9 | |
Blue (448 nm) | -10.7 | |
Green (524 nm) | 5.8 | |
Red (635 nm) | 4.7 | |
Red, Blue | 2.7 | |
Red, Green, Blue | 3.5 |
Kushington420, if Lush is willing to hook up Scotch with one of their panels to do a side by side than, if he can make the time and room for it, I'll see that he gets an IG Pro-420 for a side by side. To be fair I'll run it without the Pontoon but to be honest, I'd rather he run the Pontoon so he can pick up the weight that he'll lose under your panel, making the run worthwhile. Either way the offer is out there.Man that just fuckin chaps my ass... fuck it, Ill hit them up, they give an unbelievably good discount for a comp. grow, I will stack your bullshit 8" bar against anything in my arsenal. Pull your head out...
I can assure you that you have no idea what you're talking about. IG is running in more gardens than Lush and converting more large scale HID operations on a daily basis. Do the side by side and you'll quit talking smack about IG and AT on forums.So why are they not using the Apache Tech or Indagro?