Obamacare operator who spoke to Sean Hannity promptly fired.

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
If logic doesn't work, resort to random ramblings that have no baring or hold no meaning to the subject at hand. Allow me to provide examples as follows:
Are you unaware that the topic is wealth disparity? That seems odd since you bolded it in the post you quoted. Maybe you should review that post and come back to this.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
Are you unaware that the topic is wealth disparity? That seems odd since you bolded it in the post you quoted. Maybe you should review that post and come back to this.
And round and round we go. I am starting to get the feeling you smoke a lot of marijuana and therefore quickly forget what it is you are talking about.
 

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
And round and round we go. I am starting to get the feeling you smoke a lot of marijuana and therefore quickly forget what it is you are talking about.
I get the feeling you smoke a lot of marijuana, and that must be why you're acting like a confused elderly person wandering a grocery store.

You're the only one who's forgotten anything. Don't worry, I see right through your pitiful dismissal of "Off topic!" Who do you think you're kidding?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Consumers choose to send their money up to the top 10%. It makes no sense to redistribute it back to them after the choice has been made.
yes it does, you dumb shrimp. aggregate demand accounts for 2/3 of our economy.

you need to go back to devryU and demand a refund.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I get the feeling you smoke a lot of marijuana, and that must be why you're acting like a confused elderly person wandering a grocery store.

You're the only one who's forgotten anything. Don't worry, I see right through your pitiful dismissal of "Off topic!" Who do you think you're kidding?
it would be impossible to "kid" you, as you already have the "kid" part all wrapped up by yourself, kiddo.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
I get the feeling you smoke a lot of marijuana, and that must be why you're acting like a confused elderly person wandering a grocery store.

You're the only one who's forgotten anything. Don't worry, I see right through your pitiful dismissal of "Off topic!" Who do you think you're kidding?
I get the feeling you smoke a lot of marijuana, because you literally just copied and pasted what I had written prior. Speaking of elderly persons, can you inform your mom she still owes me $50. Tell that bitch to take her dentures out when she is swallowing my sword. Thanks buddy.

I hate stooping to your level, but I guess I had to. Oh well. I will find someone else with an IQ higher than 80, and can think for themselves, to debate. You are boring, have proven only that you are completely incapable of thinking for yourself. You are truly a sad person, and I feel sorry for you. Honestly, I do.
 

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
yes it does, you dumb shrimp. aggregate demand accounts for 2/3 of our economy.
No, you dumb shrimp, you don't seem to be following. The bottom 90% controls about $7 trillionin purchasing power every year. That's the aggregate demand you're talking about. How do you think the top 10% ends up with all the money? The bottom 90% hand their share right over. I've already explained this thesis to you twice in great detail. You totally ignored both posts.

We are responsible for the concentration of wealth. It makes no sense to take the money away from people we willingly and happily gave it to in order to give it back to us (expecting them to fund more of the government is a different matter).

you need to go back to devryU and demand a refund.
Yeah, seriously, you really do need to go to Devry and demand a refund for that shitty education they sold you.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
No, you dumb shrimp, you don't seem to be following. The bottom 90% controls about $7 trillionin purchasing power every year. That's the aggregate demand you're talking about. How do you think the top 10% ends up with all the money? The bottom 90% hand their share right over. I've already explained this thesis to you twice in great detail. You totally ignored both posts.

We are responsible for the concentration of wealth. It makes no sense to take the money away from people we willingly and happily gave it to in order to give it back to us (expecting them to fund more of the government is a different matter).



Yeah, seriously, you really do need to go to Devry and demand a refund for that shitty education they sold you.
Yet you want to reduce their taxes and make corporations into people. You vote against your interests. Nimrod.
 

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
I get the feeling you smoke a lot of marijuana, because you literally just copied and pasted what I had written prior. Speaking of elderly persons, can you inform your mom she still owes me $50. Tell that bitch to take her dentures out when she is swallowing my sword. Thats buddy.
I've begun repeating asinine things said to me back at the people who said them, so you've hopefully got the point: stop bullshitting. Stand on substance or don't bother standing.

I hate stooping to your level, but I guess I had to. Oh well. I will find someone else with an IQ higher than 80, and can think for themselves, to debate. You are boring, have proven only that you are completely incapable of thinking for yourself. You are truly a sad person, and I feel sorry for you. Honestly, I do.
That's not my level, it's your level/Buck's level/the level of many others in these parts. It's the level you pick when facts and substance are insufficient to carry you through.

Don't worry, I know the truth. Since I already demonstrated that several claims you made were factually wrong--despite your insulting me for making such claims, even though they could have very easily been verified with some simple Google searches--you're not willing to make yourself look like an idiot anymore.

Fair enough. Spare yourself the embarrassment of continuing to look foolish.
 

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
yeah, i tend to tune out when someone starts beating the retard drum.
Cognitive dissonance at its best! No, I'm not going to bother dealing with these inconvenient facts you've presented. Instead I'm just going to call you a retard, ignore you, and repeat the same tired nonsense.

What are you afraid of? Truth? Don't worry, I already know the answer.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I've begun repeating asinine things said to me back at the people who said them, so you've hopefully got the point: stop bullshitting. Stand on substance or don't bother standing.



That's not my level, it's your level/Buck's level/the level of many others in these parts. It's the level you pick when facts and substance are insufficient to carry you through.

Don't worry, I know the truth. Since I already demonstrated that several claims you made were factually wrong--despite your insulting me for making such claims, even though they could have very easily been verified with some simple Google searches--you're not willing to make yourself look like an idiot anymore.

Fair enough. Spare yourself the embarrassment of continuing to look foolish.
when i grow up, i'm gonna be an admissions officer for ITT tech so i can tell applicants the race and SES of the applicant they were rejected for.

:lol:
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Cognitive dissonance at its best! No, I'm not going to bother dealing with these inconvenient facts you've presented. Instead I'm just going to call you a retard, ignore you, and repeat the same tired nonsense.

What are you afraid of? Truth? Don't worry, I already know the answer.
you don't know shit, kiddo.

just like you, i also knew everything when i was 17.

you'll look back on these years one day, kiddo.
 

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
Yet you want to reduce their taxes and make corporations into people. You vote against your interests. Nimrod.
I never said anything about reducing anyone's taxes (indeed, I actually did the opposite, since I proposed a 100% estate tax--nimrod); and for legal purposes corporations already are people. How high are you right now...?
 

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
you don't know shit, kiddo.

just like you, i also knew everything when i was 17.

you'll look back on these years one day, kiddo.
You don't know shit, kiddo. You want to know how I know? Because you never say shit in your posts. They're empty, devoid, meaningless, comprised almost entirely of irrelevant attacks and misleading statements.

You run away from serious posts in favor of jumping straight into the mud. Your cowardice betrays your barren mind.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
I've begun repeating asinine things said to me back at the people who said them, so you've hopefully got the point: stop bullshitting. Stand on substance or don't bother standing.



That's not my level, it's your level/Buck's level/the level of many others in these parts. It's the level you pick when facts and substance are insufficient to carry you through.

Don't worry, I know the truth. Since I already demonstrated that several claims you made were factually wrong--despite your insulting me for making such claims, even though they could have very easily been verified with some simple Google searches--you're not willing to make yourself look like an idiot anymore.

Fair enough. Spare yourself the embarrassment of continuing to look foolish.
No, you spare yourself the embarrassment of continuing to look foolish. You claim nothing and are factually wrong, you have provided nothing, not even simple Google searches-- you're not willing to make yourself look like an idiot anymore.
 

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
No, you spare yourself the embarrassment of continuing to look foolish. You claim nothing and are factually wrong, you have provided nothing, not even simple Google searches-- you're not willing to make yourself look like an idiot anymore.
See, this is why you should have just kept your mouth shut. I gave you citations when you declared I was wrong. Do you need a citation to find the citations or would you just like to continue saying things that are factually wrong (see above)?
 
Top