Tags High Efficiency Lighting Garden

chazbolin

Well-Known Member
Over the relatively short time I have known Tags I've enjoyed the ebb and flow of our many discussions and will miss his posts. Whatever the reason for his hiatus, Tags has brought alot to RIU and I wanted to just throw this out there for consideration.

I don't think any company, AT included, has any reason, whatsoever, to not support those who have invested their own time and money into that company's product(s) when that person, compensated or not, is taking their work to the public and showing how those products perform so that a wider audience can make an informed decision as to how that product(s) will likely work in their own garden. I think Tags, as an end user of AT products, has shown enthusiasm that goes far beyond what any company could hope for from someone who is willing to carry the corporate torch without any direct compensation. Discounts on AT products would be the least I would expect AT to provide. And if they are willing to provide that type of indirect compensation and go even further by relying on Tags to man the Apache booth at the last Maximum Yield show in SF they know that his gardens of choice are cannabis and he is actively promoting the use of their products for this application. It is long past the time that manufacturers quit playing this little two step. When I go to any MY show 90% of the people I talk to are growing weed and 100% of of the hydro crowd are growing weed. The mere fact that AT has a booth with Tags in it means they recognize this and have, at a minimum, passively condoned it.

I'm an ESCO with Inda-Gro which means I get discounts, on their products for every garden I've ever helped set up. If I introduce someone to IG who becomes an ESCO I get a hearty handshake and that ESCO buys at the same levels as I do. I know this and still set up ESCO's all the time. Because it's good for the grower! It's not so great for the wholesalers who leach 40% off the backs of the gardener and depend on brick and mortar retailers to extend their obscene profits, driven by international hyper media campaigns with semi-clad chicks laying on their arched backs all meant to promote the idea that this is the 'product to buy', the 'must have' for your garden. So the retailers don't push LED lights because 'they don't stack up to HID' when even if that in the majority of the cases is true, there are companies out there like AT that make products that are meant to compete with HID because they have built a better mouse trap. The retailers have it much easier pushing the 'tried and true' that the wholesaler has been marketing for them and has made it at least somewhat profitable to stock and sell because whenever someone walks in the store and asks 'what works best?' it just so happens to be whatever the store has on their shelves and since the marketing is behind it the majority of purchases are determined by the sizzle and not the steak.

But all this is changing for the retailers. Rapidly. Big boxes like Walmart, Home Depot, Sear, Lowes, etc... are selling hydro systems now. With so many retailers racing to the bottom by trying to keep market share by reducing their prices to Amazon.com levels they are assuring that their days are numbered. When any of the big boxes get serious about this (give them 1-2 years) and get up to speed believe me the existing distribution system is going to be gone because the big boys buy up all the mfg in China and squeeze the wholesale/retailer out of existence.

AT needs qualified independent types of reviews now more than ever. They need this type of qualified support to factually lay out what their products can do in a cannabis garden. They do not have the luxury of ignoring the cannabis market because it is these gardens that drive innovation. Their innovations. To put those innovations into perspective, I was at the 2013 Agronomics expo in Reno, NV last week where IG had a booth and two of the noted guest speakers who I had the opportunity meet were the CA Secretary of Agriculture, Dr. Karen Ross and the Father of Agricultural Bio-Technology, Dr. Robert Fraley. These people are not hung up on R&D with cannabis at all. In fact Dr. Ross was the first to note that CA has recently recognized industrial hemp as a legal crop within the state with passage of SB 566 http://sd11.senate.ca.gov/news/2013-09-27-governor-signs-senator-leno-s-industrial-hemp-bill What I found especially rewarding, having been in the industry since the 70's, was how many of the 'traditional' farmers who attended this convention were very interested in if IG products were used for cannabis. These are well established, successful businessmen who had absolutely no problem discussing cannabis in terms of it's use in medical treatment and recognizing that their industry is taking a new approach to how cannabis might fit into their land-crop management decisions in the coming years.

There are just so many NASA and university greenhouse retrofits going on and I can assure you that AT is not getting all of them. If Tags isn't posting on RIU anymore because things got wonky with AT on the discount code for RIU readers that should not have happened and ultimately it represents a loss in sales from those who may have purchased AT but now won't. If I tell my customer something is going to happen and I have factory assurances that it's going to happen and I relay it to my customers or readers then it had damn well better happen. There is no excuse for that and I would not tolerate it as any company I represent has to have my back. Even if covering my back which was only what I was told I could convey to my customers anyway costs them a few bucks in the short run. What is the big deal when you weigh the potential cost of losing support from those who would provide honest evaluations of their products. By losing even a little bit of that support it helps to add fuel to the debate as to why one should simply not buy into any technology other than HID. No lighting manufacturer, who competes with HID, can afford to take a position, either publicly or privately, where the cannabis gardener might be even considered as somehow less significant than more traditional gardens.

Be well brother Tags. Your work has been appreciated by many. Don't stay a stranger and if you ever need anything you know how to find me.
 

hyroot

Well-Known Member
Tags just changed his name. He is still here. Read the posts in the last couple pages. Funny shit. No apache drama...
 

chazbolin

Well-Known Member
Tags just changed his name. He is still here. Read the posts in the last couple pages. Funny shit. No apache drama...
Good to hear. After Spliff I find I can work myself into a lather.
 

hyroot

Well-Known Member
The new 2014 a51's are going to be 3700k x-te .. Woo wee. I will grab one in a few months for the 3x3 new strain tent. The HD crees are hit or miss with what ever led's... Going to grab cmh's first.

with spliff that was bullshit. Anytime anyone said they wanted one. Spliff would pm that person about getting a deal. So he would get his hook up I guess. Tags /green shown apache, inda gro, a51 and house hold crees. So not pushing anything like spliff kinda did.
 

Chronikool

Well-Known Member
Tags just changed his name. He is still here. Read the posts in the last couple pages. Funny shit. No apache drama...
Wait....what....? you mean he isnt gone....and i am still stuck at the bottom of this stupid ladder with you...? (my bestest RIU buddy... :-P )
 

hyroot

Well-Known Member
^^^^ with me... I don't rock a light held together with duct tape string and fake jewelry that looks like a prop from a syfy movie.

riu bff's lol
 

Greengenes707

Well-Known Member
The new 2014 a51's are going to be 3700k x-te .. Woo wee. I will grab one in a few months for the 3x3 new strain tent. The HD crees are hit or miss with what ever led's... Going to grab cmh's first.

with spliff that was bullshit. Anytime anyone said they wanted one. Spliff would pm that person about getting a deal. So he would get his hook up I guess. Tags /green shown apache, inda gro, a51 and house hold crees. So not pushing anything like spliff kinda did.
I saw that they finally said they will be the xt-e's. Should be some real flower power, so everyone can stop worrying that it's all white.
 

Chronikool

Well-Known Member
^^^^ with me... I don't rock a light held together with duct tape string and fake jewelry that looks like a prop from a syfy movie.

riu bff's lol
Hey c'mon.....the Apache's dont look that bad.... :-P and i didnt say we would be friends forever.....
 

RedCarpetMatches

Well-Known Member
The new 2014 a51's are going to be 3700k x-te .. Woo wee. I will grab one in a few months for the 3x3 new strain tent. The HD crees are hit or miss with what ever led's... Going to grab cmh's first.

with spliff that was bullshit. Anytime anyone said they wanted one. Spliff would pm that person about getting a deal. So he would get his hook up I guess. Tags /green shown apache, inda gro, a51 and house hold crees. So not pushing anything like spliff kinda did.
Upgrade me! Ope just got an email...first in line hyroot back order'd.
 

Greengenes707

Well-Known Member
What do you guys know about clone stems swelling and literally busting open. white bumps but nothing root status yet.

IMG_0312.jpg
IMG_0313.jpg


First clone run in the new room so need to work get thing dialed. Temps are lower, 65*-69* all the time. Eventually I will have a 3x3 for veg and clones. For now it is all in the flower room and that is so well insulated it is just constant.
 

hyroot

Well-Known Member
^^^^ it happens from time to time. it just means hearty growth. Back back in the day. I used to pinch my stems on young clones to make the stems thicker. It slows down tough. Then takes off once it heals. I wonder why I stopped doing that.....?
 

HrilL

Active Member
I would always get swelling stems when I used rockwool. I switched to peat plugs and haven't gone back since. They don't stay as wet so you need to water them more often but I get clones faster.

As for being colder in your area a simple heat matt will solve that. Should give you another 10 degrees above what you currently have.
 

Greengenes707

Well-Known Member
I would always get swelling stems when I used rockwool. I switched to peat plugs and haven't gone back since. They don't stay as wet so you need to water them more often but I get clones faster.

As for being colder in your area a simple heat matt will solve that. Should give you another 10 degrees above what you currently have.
I have heard that. And rock wool is not my normal route for clone, but I had some. Back to aero. I literally just moved them to the areo 10min ago. I think it's the temps. Never gets over 70*. I have a heat mat and it's been on the whole time so still not enough.

All the stems are swollen with white growth, but not roots, just a mass...but then a normal unswollen underneath all that bulging. and they are really healthy.
 

chazbolin

Well-Known Member
Since this thread has to do with energy efficiency I thought I'd throw it out here. With plasma recommending the use if the DE1000 HPS lamp I don't see how this is energy efficient at all and if energy efficiency is not what is motivating the decision to buy into plasma/DE1000 why not just go with the 'brand new technology' 1500 watt Ultra Sun at 206,000 lumens? There certainly isn't an energy efficient benefit but in terms of plant response does anyone have any thoughts as to why you'd go with the DE over a traditional 1000 watt HPS or the new technology 1500 watt HPS?

https://www.sunlightsupply.com/p-13059-ultra-sun-master-blaster-1500-watt-lamp.aspx
 

Greengenes707

Well-Known Member
Since this thread has to do with energy efficiency I thought I'd throw it out here. With plasma recommending the use if the DE1000 HPS lamp I don't see how this is energy efficient at all and if energy efficiency is not what is motivating the decision to buy into plasma/DE1000 why not just go with the 'brand new technology' 1500 watt Ultra Sun at 206,000 lumens? There certainly isn't an energy efficient benefit but in terms of plant response does anyone have any thoughts as to why you'd go with the DE over a traditional 1000 watt HPS or the new technology 1500 watt HPS?

https://www.sunlightsupply.com/p-13059-ultra-sun-master-blaster-1500-watt-lamp.aspx
Definatley not efficient there.

I really don't have any faith or interest in plasma's. They seem weak and coverage is low. They have a nice full spectrum, but there are plenty of better full spectrum options with more intensity and coverage. Also cheaper.

As far as hps goes, gavita/phillips DE's are the shit imo. The best and most impressive garden I have ever seen was all gavita's. Plus the lumen maintenance is really good for HID. Like 3 years maintaining over 90%.

1500w might be too much for an indoor garden. Even with 8' ceilings that could be too much and intense. Also it might not improve the coverage that much. But in a greenhouse could do some damage.
 

chazbolin

Well-Known Member
Plasma lacks the red-far red necessary for flower. So the need for HPS to provide those spectrums in flower is not in debate and in fact recommended by Gavita to add the DE1000 to their 300 watt plasma to achieve full spectrum for flowering. This puts us @ 1300 watts per ~5 x 5. The reason they want you to run the plasma and the DE1000 together is because the added UV-B from plasma, which the HPS alone does not produce, is going to increase trichome production.

To adequately mix the plasma and HPS it's going to require an alternating placement pattern of multiple fixtures as these are both point source technologies. But take away that portion of the equation and hypothesize that a single plasma and DE 1000 will deliver the greatest quality and yield that a grower can ever hope to achieve indoors. Better than any other technology available. If that ends up being the case where does that leave the 1000 watt screw in base HPS lamps? Why would one give up a traditional screw base 1000 watt HPS and invest in a DE HPS of the same wattage unless the DE1000 significantly outperformed a screw base HPS? To achieve these results the DE1000 spectrum would have to be different in that it is pushing farther into the R-FR than the screw base HPS. And if that is the case, there is nothing about a DE1000 HPS lamp that cannot be recreated, should it be warranted, by a screw base HPS lamp that would mimic the exact same spectral distribution as the DE1000 lamp.

Now on to the 1500 watt HPS Ultra Sun. Since we're not considering watts/sq meter efficiencies this is a lamp that would emit ~2200 uMlole at 24" compared to the the DE 1000 that emits ~1500 uMole at 24". If one were to evacuate the heat and raise the 1500 watt lamp by 6" I've actually outproduced the area coverage/intensity of the DE as measured in uMoles by 50%. When dealing in a plasma/hps solution where watts/sq meter is a non factor and one seeks a higher PPFD value the DE1000 is not going to deliver, on paper, like the 1500 watt ultra sun lamp would. And these HPS PPFD values have not been adjusted up for the plasma contribution which under a field measurement will add another 20-30% to the total PPFD. I think it's also worthy to note that Sunlight Supply sells both the 1500 watt Ultra Sun advertised at a 206,000 (ahem) lumen output and the DE1000 on their website and they don't reciprocate by providing lumen output on the DE1000. https://www.sunlightsupply.com/p-15078-digimax-double-ended-lamp.aspx

The average gardener, who buys a limited number of grow lights and lamps over the course of their career, can be influenced by; what the hydroshop salesman tells them is the best way to go, what their grow buddy has been doing 'forever', slick advertising/marketing, or from their own research. If they dig in a little bit and learn what PPF and PPFD means they likely are going make their purchasing decision on which technology has the highest PPF/PPFD values. Yes they will get results but compared to what? Had they chosen to go with an AT or an IG, which approaches plant lighting differently, they would have yielded respectable weights, high quality herb and saved themselves a boat load of money over the years in utility and replacement lamp costs. But they won't know that because the higher PPF/PPFD being advertised won over their purchasing decision.

So I go back to V-C-F as a way of bringing this point back home. See Page 6 @ http://www.inda-gro.com/pdf/MeasuringPlantLight.pdf

If one were to look at the Lumigro 650 it would, on paper, be considered game over. It would appear we found the best light for plant growth as it wallops every other competing technology with a PPF of 1.8 uMole/Second/Watt. The problem for Lumigrow has been that when trialing a Lumigrow 650 against the competing technologies the plant response has not been positively influenced by the marketing claims of 1.8 uMole/S/W value and will yield according to the combination of spectrum's (or lack thereof) and the intensities which their panel produces.

If manufacturers and wholesalers are going to tout the virtues of their lamps with who has the highest lumen, lumen/watt, lux, uMole, PPF, PPFD values they will continue to perpetuate the myth that these values can somehow define which technology works better when in side by side garden trials the lower PPFD value light can be a much better deal when comparing efficiencies and actual plant photomorphology between the technologies. Which of course is why these forums (really the only place) showing real garden results with a wide variety of strains, i.e, party cup competitions, is critical in dispelling deeply ingrained notions such as >60 watts/sq foot can somehow spell the successful formula for determining the 'best' light or technology for an indoor garden.
 
Top