Search results

i guess that makes it the best light for the manufacturer not the costumer

further more Amare has always seem to skimp on the cobs, like a generation behind always. when everybody was rocking cxa 3070 Amare was using 2530. now a couple years later with Citi and Gen 7 Amare upgrades to last years CXB

you always claim Amare and Victor has done all this field testing and i have a hard time even finding consistent grow journals using his lights. can you get Victor to supply these claims you keep making for him. how about some testing from the manufacturer like the other grow light companies...

but you can dicker with him for a better price like a car salesman so says the Amare crew

has platinum ever updated the diodes they use or are they still rocking last decade leds?

this is what ive noticed aswell! its all about canopy management if you dont want larf the budsit shouldnt be there when you go into flower. train your plant before flower not during.

250+ grams from 2 65w Viperspectrum you got pics of that?

read

would you really expect it to do less? i know it was your grows, just surprised of your skepticism.

i think ive seen a couple grows using LM561B chips, you might have seen them? seem the LM561C would be a step up

but when you have 12 emitters that are 1/12 the wattage but half as intense based on your theory, why hang them higher? if at twice the distance away is the proper intensity shouldnt you only need 2x75 emitting from the same area to have your coverage based on your theory? not 12 cobs?

why hang it higher i dont understand your train of thought at this point thank you its more about yoda being on the rag as he complains in any thread he views

so thats 75 watts per emitter, right? hung at 12"-18" compared to 1000w hps at twice the distance? seems to me based on that theory the cob is more intense.... the cob is roughly 1/12 the power yet needs to hang just half as far away

where can i get 1000w cob?

i thought we just talking about the spectrum shifting. i honestly dont have anything against the light, i actually had a fondness for them till somebody came around with a bad attitude. Im glad the augmenting has worked so well for you but it has let down others, like myself. once you start...

i agree 3500k cob can do both and it does both extremely well. sure you can augment the spectrum and get more desirable results in your environment and thats cool, but super charging with mono is just ridiculous your playing with the spectrum. maybe you guys could not make it about the company...

so you turn off all the cool white to flower is my understanding? seems you could mix cobs the same way you mix mono and cobs...

dont know how you got there?... its more about this is more realistic to me as opposed to this magic spectrum augmenting

think about this, by adding mono LEDs your augmenting the SPD. its about the same difference between an 80 cri to 90 cri 3000k spectrum. the white light already emits all the colors your supplementing except IR or UV if your using those models my point is your just messing with the relative...