2022 elections. The steady march for sanity continues.

Dapper_Dillinger

Well-Known Member
It's funny, many people are willing to say that dems/reps are shit, which we know accounts for like 90% of the population, which is pretty much the same as saying that Americans are shit, but it usually hurts too much and we balk. We know what one plus one is, but for some reason we struggle to actually say "two". It's our ego that prevents us from fully admitting it.
Ego is the number one problem. I believe its the labels that are America's Biggest problem. Every thing has to be black or white. Dem or Republican. I love it that everyone thats not a Democrat is now a trump supporter lmao
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Its hilarious that you believe you can fix a broken and corrupt system by using the mechanisms design for said system, by said system. Carry on plebs...
And yet you believe the shit being posted by the con artists that propammed you to call me a 'pleb'.

Ego is the number one problem. I believe its the labels that are America's Biggest problem. Every thing has to be black or white. Dem or Republican. I love it that everyone thats not a Democrat is now a trump supporter lmao
I agree about the 'labels', the right wing propaganda machine (foreign and domestic) has spent a lot of time and money to spam the labels to trick people into believing their big lies.
 

mooray

Well-Known Member
Ego is the number one problem. I believe its the labels that are America's Biggest problem. Every thing has to be black or white. Dem or Republican. I love it that everyone thats not a Democrat is now a trump supporter lmao
Part of why we need to improve as a whole. I've seen it a thousand times, you critique a dem and you've got Trump's nuts down your throat, or you critique Trump and you're socialist scum. The problem isn't that we use those labels, it's just that we're too dumb and scared to have any desire to do anything else. We need to improve as a whole and we're lost in the symptoms without even knowing we're sick.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
https://apnews.com/article/democrat-voting-bill-8ff401dd96dbd75adbb3b217c7089afe
Screen Shot 2021-03-01 at 8.58.23 PM.png
WASHINGTON (AP) — As Congress begins debate this week on sweeping voting and ethics legislation, Democrats and Republicans can agree on one thing: If signed into law, it would usher in the biggest overhaul of U.S. elections law in at least a generation.

House Resolution 1, Democrats’ 791-page bill, would touch virtually every aspect of the electoral process — striking down hurdles to voting erected in the name of election security, curbing partisan gerrymandering and curtailing the influence of big money in politics.

Republicans see those very measures as threats that would both limit the power of states to conduct elections and ultimately benefit Democrats, notably with higher turnout among minority voters.

The stakes are prodigious, with control of Congress and the fate of President Joe Biden’s legislative agenda in the balance. But at its core, a more foundational principle of American democracy is at play: access to the ballot.

“This goes above partisan interests. The vote is at the heart of our democratic system of government,” said Fred Wertheimer, president of the nonpartisan good government organization Democracy 21. “That’s the battleground. And everyone knows it.”

MORE STORIES:
Barriers to voting are as old as the country, but in more recent history they have come in the form of voter ID laws and other restrictions that are up for debate in statehouses across the country.

Rep. John Sarbanes, a Maryland Democrat who sponsored the bill, said that outside of Congress “these aren’t controversial reforms.” Much of it, he noted, was derived from the recommendations of bipartisan commissions.

Yet to many Republicans, it amounts to an unwarranted federal intrusion into a process that states should control.

“It imposes from Washington, D.C., a one-size-fits-all regulatory scheme on each state,” Rep. Tom Cole, R-Okla., said Monday during a hearing on the bill. “What’s worse, it does this even though states have been traditionally allowed to generally run elections however they see fit.”

Citing Congress’ constitutional authority over federal elections, Democrats say national rules are needed to make voting more uniform, accessible and fair. The bill would mandate early voting, same-day registration and other long-sought changes that Republicans reject.

It would also require so-called dark money political groups to disclose anonymous donors, create reporting requirements for online political ads and appropriate nearly $2 billion for election infrastructure upgrades. Future presidents would be obligated to disclose their tax returns, which former President Donald Trump refused to do.

Debate over the bill comes at a critical moment, particularly for Democrats.

Acting on Trump’s repeated false claims of a stolen election, dozens of Republican-controlled state legislatures are pushing bills that would make it more difficult to vote. Democrats argue this would disproportionately hit low-income voters, or those of color, who are critical constituencies for their party.

The U.S. is also on the cusp of a once-in-a-decade redrawing of congressional districts, a highly partisan affair that is typically controlled by state legislatures. With Republicans controlling the majority of statehouses the process alone could help the GOP win enough seats to recapture the House. The Democratic bill would instead require that the boundaries be drawn by independent commissions.

Previous debates over voting rights have often been esoteric and complex, with much of the debate in Congress focused on whether to restore a “preclearance” process in the Voting Rights Act that the Supreme Court invalidated in 2013. For decades, it had required certain states and jurisdictions with large minority populations and a history of discrimination to get federal approval for any changes to voting procedures.

Full Coverage: Politics
But Republicans say that Trump’s repeated attacks on the 2020 election have electrified his supporters, even as courts and his last attorney general, William Barr, found them without merit.

“This is now a base issue,” said Ken Cuccinelli, a former Virginia attorney general and Trump administration official in the Department of Homeland Security who is leading a conservative coalition opposed to the bill. “Democratic leadership is willing to sacrifice their own members to pass radical legislation. They are cannon fodder that Nancy Pelosi doesn’t care about.”

Cuccinelli is overseeing a $5 million campaign aimed at pressuring Senate Democrats to oppose the bill.

Democrats say their aim is to make it easier for more people to vote, regardless of partisan affiliation. And they counter that Republican objections are based more in preserving their own power by hindering minorities from voting than a principled opposition.

“The anti-democratic forces in the Republican Party have focused their energy on peddling unwarranted and expensive voter restriction measures,” said Stacey Abrams, who narrowly lost her 2018 Georgia bid to become the first Black female governor in U.S. history. “We all have a right to take our seat at the table and our place at the ballot box.”

The bill was an object of intense focus at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference in Orlando, Florida, over the weekend, a gathering where Trump’s lies about mass election fraud took center stage.

In a speech Sunday, Trump branded the bill as “a disaster” and a “monster” that “cannot be allowed to pass.”

Meanwhile, CPAC organizer Matt Schlapp told attendees that if they could internalize one thing from this year’s conference, it was to “do all you can” to stop “this unconstitutional power grab” from becoming law.

“What we saw this election will be what you will see every single election. And we have to fight it,” Schlapp warned ominously.

Trump and his allies have made false claims that the 2020 election was marred by widespread voter fraud. But dozens of legal challenges they put forth were dismissed, including by the Supreme Court.

Ultimately, though, the biggest obstacle Democrats face in passing the bill is themselves.

Despite staunch GOP opposition, the bill is all but certain to pass the House when it’s scheduled for a floor vote Wednesday. But challenges lie ahead in the Senate, which is split 50-50 between Republicans and Democrats.

On some legislation, it takes only 51 votes to pass, with Vice President Kamala Harris as the tiebreaker. On a deeply divisive bill like this one, they would need 60 votes under the Senate’s rules to overcome a Republican filibuster — a tally they are unlikely to reach.

Some have discussed options like lowering the threshold to break a filibuster, or creating a workaround that would allow some legislation to be exempt. Democratic congressional aides say the conversations are fluid but underway.

Many in the party remain hopeful, and the Biden White House has called the bill “landmark legislation” that “is urgently needed to protect the right to vote.” But the window to pass it before the 2022 midterms is closing.

“We may not get the opportunity to make this change again for many, many decades,” said Sarbanes, the bill’s lead sponsor. “Shame on us if we don’t get this done.”
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
https://apnews.com/article/senate-elections-michael-brown-elections-house-elections-roy-blunt-687c91186e10fdf24a4f05bbc6959b80
Screen Shot 2021-03-08 at 11.51.48 AM.png
COLUMBIA, Mo. (AP) — Republican Sen. Roy Blunt of Missouri will not seek a third term in the U.S. Senate, he said Monday in a surprise announcement.

Blunt, who turned 71 in January, was widely expected to seek a third term in 2022. Before election to the Senate he served seven terms in the U.S. House. He also served two terms as Missouri’s secretary of state from 1985 to 1993.

“In every job Missourians have allowed me to have, I’ve tried to do my best,” Blunt said in his announcement made via video. “In almost 12,000 votes in the Congress, I’m sure I wasn’t right every time, but you really make that decision based on the information you have at the time.

“After 14 General Election victories — three to county office, seven to the United States House of Representatives, and four statewide elections — I won’t be a candidate for reelection to the United States Senate next year,” he said.

Blunt is the No. 4 in Senate Republican leadership and is the fifth Senate Republican to decide against running for re-election in 2022. The others are Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, Rob Portman of Ohio, Richard Shelby of Alabama and Richard Burr of North Carolina.

Two other Republicans — Sens. Charles Grassley of Iowa and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin — have not yet said whether they plan to seek reelection.

The open seats will set up contested primaries likely to highlight divisions between far-right, Trump-aligned Republicans and the old guard. In Ohio, Pennsylvania and North Carolina, in particular, Democrats have hopes of winning seats.

Any such hopes are muted in Missouri, which was for decades a swing state but has moved decidedly conservative in recent elections. Several Republicans are likely to seek Blunt’s vacated post.

MORE STORIES:
They could include former Gov. Eric Greitens, who resigned amid a sex scandal and ethics investigations in 2018. Greitens told a St. Louis radio interviewer last week he was “evaluating” a run, even before Blunt’s announcement.

Lt. Gov. Mike Kehoe could also run. In a statement, he praised Blunt’s half-century of service to Missouri.

“A history teacher and the son of a dairy farmer, his traditional Missouri values made him one of the most effective members of the United States Congress,” Kehoe said. “Roy Blunt’s American dream story is inspiring to us all.”

After a failed gubernatorial bid in 1992, Blunt was elected to the House in 1996 and re-elected six times, winning by wide majorities each time. He was House majority whip from 2003 to 2007.

After incumbent Republican Sen. Kit Bond announced his retirement in 2009, Blunt ran for the vacated seat and defeated Democrat Robin Carnahan by a 54% to 41% vote in 2010. He narrowly won reelection in 2016, defeating Democrat Jason Kander by less than 3 percentage points.

Full Coverage: Politics
Kander indicated he wasn’t interested in trying again, noting his role as president of an organization that helps provide housing for veterans.

“Love this work, don’t want a new job,” Kander said on Twitter. “I’ll campaign for the Dem nominee!”
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Murdoch is responsible for social division and mass death in America just for profit, he also brought you Trump and has caused America more damage than any other individual by far. He's an immigrant too and perhaps Joe should deport the fucker, his heir moved back the Australia, after his dad left America in flames.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Former Australian prime minister puts Rupert Murdoch on blast

Former Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull speaks to CNN's Brian Stelter about Rupert Murdoch, the Australian-born American media mogul whose global empire includes Fox News.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
https://apnews.com/article/health-voting-voter-registration-voting-rights-business-03bf0250f76a55155f4e3b2d933ad11c
Screen Shot 2021-04-23 at 7.28.13 PM.png
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Democrats pushed back Friday against a Republican rewrite of election laws forthcoming in Ohio as “regressive,” saying its ballot drop box limits, tightened voter ID requirements and shortened early voting window amount to voter suppression.

“In a state that has set the bar for extreme anti-voter laws, this proposal actively takes steps to put Ohio further back in the fight for access to the voting booth,” Ohio Democratic Chair Liz Walters said in a statement. “By limiting Ohioans’ ability to vote and by sowing confusion, statehouse Republicans are once again attacking the fundamental right to vote in this state.”

Walters called the bill, whose details were released late Thursday, worse for voters than an overhaul of voting protocols that Georgia undertook after former President Donald Trump’s repeated, baseless claims of election fraud.

Republican state Rep. Bill Seitz, a Cincinnati Republican who is sponsoring the Ohio bill, told The Associated Press earlier this week that he’s been working on the legislation for months. He said it is not intended to suppress voters but to incorporate changes sought by Democrats, Republicans, election officials and voter advocates.

“Happily for Ohio, the reforms we have already implemented helped to ensure that there were only minimal complaints about the Ohio election results in 2020,” a co-sponsorship request he circulated Thursday to fellow lawmakers said. “But there is always room for improvement in safeguarding the integrity of election processes.”

The bill would “automate” voter registration in the state by allowing Ohioans to opt in while they’re doing business at the Bureau of Motor Vehicles, but Walters said that should not be confused with “automatic” voter registration, which entails the government registering all eligible citizens without them having to take additional steps.

It also would create an online system for requesting absentee, or mail-in, ballots — as Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose and voting rights advocates have long sought. However, the web form would entail two-step identity authentication with two separate forms of acceptable identification, up from the one form required now to request such a ballot by mail.

Walters pushed back against that as a voter suppression tactic. Her party also criticized two provisions of the bill for which bipartisan state or local election officials have lobbied: eliminating early voting on the Monday before the election, which presents logistical processing difficulties; and moving back the deadline for requesting an absentee ballot from three days to 10 days before the election.

During the 2020 pandemic-affected election, support grew for that latter change amid concern that it would be impossible to guarantee both an absentee application and a return ballot could get through the U.S. mail in such a short time.

Seitz’s legislation also would prioritize the order of forms of identification that voters can present, so that they may not use the last four digits of the social security number many have committed to memory if they have been issued an Ohio driver’s license or state ID card. For those without the other forms of ID, a provision says they can use electronic versions of their bank statements or utility bills rather than hard copies.

Perhaps most irritating to the Ohio Democratic Party is Seitz’s decision to include in the bill a permanent prohibition on placing ballot drop boxes at various spots around a county, rather than only at the county board of elections.

The party fought a long legal battle last year against LaRose’s one-per-county location limit on drop boxes, which surged in use and popularity in Ohio and nationally as a convenience during the pandemic. While that court fight upheld LaRose’s right to establish the rule, it also established legally that there was nothing preventing him from allowing multiple drop box locations, say, at post offices or libraries.

Seitz’s bill would explicitly prohibit that, answering LaRose’s call for legislative clarity on the issue — though with a different result than the elections chief had said he supported. The legislation will, however, allow the drop box practice that Ohio began solely as a result of COVID-19 to continue into the future with at least three receptacles on county election board property.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
What makes these people think that it won't affect their turnout? Except for last year, republicans used mail in voting the most. The surge in republican voters last year were "infrequent" voters, who sensed Armageddon and came out for Trump. They don't strike me as highly motivated voters and will be largely absent in 2022 and those who do show, won't like long lines. A lot of this bullshit will be struck down by the courts, the intent is obvious, but the result might not be. They continue to make a stronger case of voters rights and HR-1 in the red state houses, that even Manchin and Sinema will vote for as a matter of political survival. They also continue to heap shit on Justice John Roberts and the conservatives on the SCOTUS, who struck down voters rights, claiming it was no longer required. In light of recent events they should be publicly challenged on this and made to debate and defend the merits of the decision, they did not just err, they fucked up to the point of near national destruction.

Considering what the republican party morphed into at lightspeed, they might even be willing to reconsider, or not fuck with the new voting rights legislation. The conservative's political home burned to the ground in front of them and they witnessed it's destruction and will give the crazies no future electoral advantages.
 
Last edited:

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
What makes these people think that it won't affect their turnout? Except for last year, republicans used mail in voting the most. The surge in republican voters last year were "infrequent" voters, who sensed Armageddon and came out for Trump. They don't strike me as highly motivated voters and will be largely absent in 2022 and those who do show, won't like long lines. A lot of this bullshit will be struck down by the courts, the intent is obvious, but the result might not be. They continue to make a stronger case of voters rights and HR-1 in the red state houses, that even Manchin and Sinema will vote for as a matter of political survival. They also continue to heap shit on Justice John Roberts and the conservatives on the SCOTUS, who struck down voters rights, claiming it was no longer required. In light of recent events they should be publicly challenged on this and made to debate and defend the merits of the decision, they did not just err, they fucked up to the point of near national destruction.

Considering what the republican party morphed into at lightspeed, they might even be willing to reconsider, or not fuck with the new voting rights legislation. The conservative's political home burned to the ground in front of them and they witnessed it's destruction and will give the crazies no future electoral advantages.
Im guessing they did the math and figure that their voters are able to access the voting drop boxes far easier (city voting areas vs suburban schools) and are well funded for a lot shorter voting lines.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Im guessing they did the math and figure that their voters are able to access the voting drop boxes far easier (city voting areas vs suburban schools) and are well funded for a lot shorter voting lines.
Oh, I factored that in too, but black voters can smell blood in the water now and change in the air, they will stand in line for as long as it takes and come prepared to do it. The republicans will cheat in unprecedented levels and are attempting to lay the ground work. They never resorted to this when Obama was on the ballot for a second time, but the nice old white man in the WH will cut into their voters (independents) and they know it. The recent moves of cooperation and not appearing obstructionist in the senate are a sign of this. The republicans behavior and the insurrection have taken the place of Trump as a motivator for democratic voters, the GOP no longer needs Trump to plumb the depths of depravity, they are doing fine on their own.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Screen Shot 2021-04-24 at 4.45.15 PM.png

Chauvin was held accountable for murdering a man only because Minnesota elected Keith Ellison for Attorney General in a off year election.

Breonna Taylor was killed when police fired into her apartment while she slept.



Screen Shot 2021-04-24 at 4.44.10 PM.png


The people who murdered her will not face justice because Kentucky AG Daniel Cameron was also elected in a off year.

Screen Shot 2021-04-24 at 4.42.06 PM.png



Just a reminder that every election matters.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
What makes these people think that it won't affect their turnout? Except for last year, republicans used mail in voting the most. The surge in republican voters last year were "infrequent" voters, who sensed Armageddon and came out for Trump. They don't strike me as highly motivated voters and will be largely absent in 2022 and those who do show, won't like long lines. A lot of this bullshit will be struck down by the courts, the intent is obvious, but the result might not be. They continue to make a stronger case of voters rights and HR-1 in the red state houses, that even Manchin and Sinema will vote for as a matter of political survival. They also continue to heap shit on Justice John Roberts and the conservatives on the SCOTUS, who struck down voters rights, claiming it was no longer required. In light of recent events they should be publicly challenged on this and made to debate and defend the merits of the decision, they did not just err, they fucked up to the point of near national destruction.

Considering what the republican party morphed into at lightspeed, they might even be willing to reconsider, or not fuck with the new voting rights legislation. The conservative's political home burned to the ground in front of them and they witnessed it's destruction and will give the crazies no future electoral advantages.
they've been cornered by the 70% while the stench of bad last president lingers. they literally can't take it- this is their temper tantrum because they can't move the goal posts or just log jam as they as so used to doing.

take it..that's their way..just take it..Lincoln's Assassination and Trumps attempt at Insurrection..that is the way of the GOP.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
The best evidence yet that America is fucked, these morons are worried about a few brown folks at the fucking southern border! Joe is in the process of saving their stupid asses with an amazing first 100 days as POTUS. These clowns don't know what the jerk (movie) was taught by his black daddy, the difference between shit and silver. I guess it's true, never cast pearls before swine. If Jesus returned for a second round they wouldn't just nail him to a fucking cross, they'd burn it too. Dubya did better FFS and until Trump he was the gold standard for stupid and fucking up.

Hopefully some of the dumb bastards will croak before 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joe Biden Approval Rating Beats Only Donald Trump and Gerald Ford's 100-Day Score: Poll (newsweek.com)

Joe Biden Approval Rating Beats Only Donald Trump and Gerald Ford's 100-Day Score: Poll

Joe Biden's approval rating after nearly 100 days in office was higher only than that of Donald Trump and Gerald Ford, a new poll suggests, with many voters questioning the president's handling of the border crisis.

According to a Langer Research Associates (LRA) poll, conducted for ABC News and The Washington Post, Biden scored a 52 approval rating after 100 days in office.

The average at the 100-day stage for the 14 presidents from Truman to Biden is 66 percent, according to previous ABC/Post polls.

Only Ford in 1974—whose rating fell to 48 percent following his unpopular pardon of Richard Nixon—and Donald Trump at 42 percent, scored lower than Biden at this stage in their respective presidencies.

The results of the latest poll was largely split among party lines: 90 percent of Democrat voters polled approved of Biden, compared to 13 percent of Republicans. Among voters for independents, Biden scored a 47 percent approval rating.

"The intensified partisanship of recent years is a factor in Biden's overall rating," the authors of the poll said. "Just 13 percent of Republicans approve of his work in office, exactly matching Democrats' approval of Trump at 100 days."

The ABC/ Post poll, which spoke 1,007 adults between April 18 to 21, also suggested:

  • Biden's pandemic relief package won 65 percent approval
  • His handling of the pandemic won 64 percent approval
  • Proposal to raise corporate taxes won 58 percent approval
  • His $2 trillion infrastructure package won 52 percent approval
  • And Biden also won 52 percent approval on his handling of the economy
Biden has, however, won strong approval ratings for his pandemic relief package and of his handling of the pandemic, standing at 65 percent and 64 percent respectively.

But, his support falls into the 50s when it comes to his proposal to raise corporate taxes, 58 percent, and his $2 trillion infrastructure package, which stands at 52 percent.

Among issues dragging down Biden's approval rating was his administration's handling of the ongoing crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border, the poll suggested, with just 37 percent of those asked believing it is being handled well.

More than half (53 percent) of those polled were concerned that Biden will increase the size of the government, but the poll also suggested the public's preference for smaller government is at its lowest in nearly 30 years.

The poll also suggested that 40 percent of voters think Biden is "too liberal", more than his Democratic predecessors at 100 days—33 percent said they believed that of Barack Obama and 26 percent of Bill Clinton—according to past surveys. More Americans thought Obama was "too liberal" as his presidency continued.

The poll's authors added: "By contrast, Biden's rating for handling the economy is essentially the same as Trump's in January, marking this as a clear challenge. Indeed, just 42 percent of Americans rate the economy positively, far below its pre-pandemic level, 58 percent instead say it's in not-so-good or poor shape. Presidential fortunes often are closely linked to economic conditions."

Youth support for Joe Biden
President Biden will also be bolstered by a 63 percent approval rating with Americans aged 18 to 29, according to a separate new poll by the Institute of Politis at Harvard Kennedy School (IPHK).

That is the highest of any president since the survey was first carried out 21 years ago.

Biden's support peaked among his own base with 90 percent of Democrats approving and 86 percent of liberals, according to the LRA poll that was conducted March 9 to 22 and spoke to 2,513 young Americans about Biden's first 100 days in office.

It added the president had earned 82 percent of Black people's support and scored well with college graduates and women at 60 percent and 56 percent, respectively.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/past-the-point-of-no-return-iowa-dems-feel-hopes-fading/2021/06/01/7ef9125a-c28e-11eb-89a4-b7ae22aa193e_story.html
Screen Shot 2021-06-01 at 6.22.45 AM.png
KEOKUK, Iowa — Democrats lost last year’s election for Iowa's 2nd Congressional District by the narrowest margin in a House race in almost 40 years. After the six-vote heartbreaker, some expected Democrat Rita Hart to immediately declare a rematch in the southeast district long held by her party.

So far, no Democrat has stepped up to run.

The hesitancy to jump into a district now as competitive as they come is one measure of Democrats’ fatigue in a state viewed for decades as a true battleground. Even as the coronavirus pandemic gradually wanes and President Joe Biden's job approval remains strong, Iowa Democrats say they can feel their party receding, particularly from the industrial river towns they once claimed as bastions.

“I kind of think we’re past the point of no return,” said Rich Taylor, a former Democratic state senator who lost last year after eight years representing economically struggling Lee County, which hugs the Mississippi River in the state’s southeast corner. “I believe that the people of southeast Iowa will wake up. But I don’t think it’s going to make a difference for the next 20 years.”

It took years to reach this point. For more than a decade, Democrats have watched their ranks in farm communities dwindle. At the same time, their once-dominant strength in the state’s factory towns was undermined by shrinking union power and population loss. Republican Donald Trump’s popularity among the white working class in those areas to some feels like a final blow.

“The big question is: Can we bring it back?” said Matt Pflug, a Democrat on the board of supervisors in Lee County. “I don’t know if we can.”

Democrats’ fight to defend a six-seat majority in the House next year could come down to battles for similar river districts. In western Wisconsin, Republican Derek Van Orden is seeking a rematch against 13-term Democrat Ron Kind, who held his seat by just 10,000 votes in 2020. Across the Mississippi, Minnesota Democrat Angie Craig won by a similarly narrow margin and will face a rematch from Republican Tyler Kistner.

Further south, Republican Edith Joy King is running again in a western Illinois district, where five-term Democrat Cheri Bustos has decided against seeking reelection. Bustos won by just 12,000 votes in 2020, after winning by more than 55,000 in 2018 and almost 60,000 in 2016.

And in northeast Iowa, there’s no rush of Democrats angling to take on Republican Rep. Ashley Hinson, who beat one-term Democrat Abby Finkenauer in Iowa's 1st Congressional District last year.

National Democrats, and some local activists, say they expect a competitive candidate to emerge in both districts. Neither Hart nor Finkenauer responded to requests for comment.

Democrats argue that the Biden administration’s economic agenda will be the key to winning these races.
His proposed infrastructure and family aid initiatives — $4 trillion in new spending on top of the $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief package passed in March — will “deliver unprecedented resources to underserved and rural communities in a way that can really provide a generational shift,” said Sam Cornale, political director of the Democratic National Committee.

“But it’s not good enough, though, to simply deliver good policy,” he said. “I think we also have to communicate how it can impact everyday Americans.”

Since February, Biden has traveled once to Wisconsin and twice to Pennsylvania and Michigan, all states he narrowly won last year. He has not been to Iowa, where Trump beat him by 8 percentage points.

Iowa was once a top political battleground. For the past two decades, the state has swung back and forth in presidential elections, while the parties traded control of the governor’s office. For 30 years, it sent liberal Democrat Tom Harkin to the Senate, as well as conservative Republican Chuck Grassley. Harkin’s seat is now occupied by Republican Joni Ernst.

Those Democratic victories relied on support from union laborers, a progressive rural farm tradition and backing in the state’s small and midsize metro areas.

Democrat Dave Loebsack, a college professor, won seven consecutive House terms in Iowa’s 2nd Congressional District until his retirement this year, chiefly by posting big margins in Johnson County, home of the University of Iowa and a growing suburban corridor.

Before that, Iowa Rep. Leonard Boswell, a Democrat, farmer and Vietnam War veteran, served for 16 years, carrying vast swaths of rural southern Iowa.

But the once-robust Democratic union base has dwindled as manufacturing jobs have left cities such as Burlington, Fort Madison and Keokuk along the river. The trend has left onetime industrial areas with disproportionately older voters without college degrees, voters who lean Republican.

In 2016, Trump carried 9 of 10 Iowa counties along the river, only missing Scott County, the most metropolitan. Notably, Trump was the first Republican since Dwight D. Eisenhower to carry Dubuque County, for decades a union stronghold.

Last year, Republican Mariannette Miller-Meeks beat Hart in the congressional race by surging dramatically in the district’s vast stretches of farmland west and south of the Mississippi River. There just weren’t enough Democratic votes in the river towns.

“We used to be able to count on the union vote here,” said former state Sen. Jerry Kerns of Keokuk, in Iowa’s southeastern corner. “Not anymore.”

Kerns was president of his United Steelworkers local for 20 of his 38 years working at Henniges automotive parts manufacturer. Today, only about 500 union employees remain of the 1,500 Kerns once represented.

Union voters are younger than 20 years ago and don’t “realize what the Democratic Party has done for organized labor,” he said.

Union leaders see Biden’s agenda as a benefit to workers, but workers themselves aren’t as engaged in the policy, Kerns said, “and are more interested in things like guns and rights they want to blame Democrats for trying to take away.”

Up the river in Des Moines County, Case International’s farm equipment plant in Burlington maintains a union workforce of about 350, down from the 2,300 who worked there 20 years ago. Des Moines and Lee counties had among the state’s highest unemployment rates in April.

There are few signs of growth in Keokuk. Faded, white clapboard Civil War-era homes and once-stately prewar brick businesses that descend Main Street and its side streets to the Mississippi River stand as monuments to more prosperous days.

Biden’s economic aid could provide Democrats ammunition to campaign in places like this. But it will have to compete with the perception that the party has been taken over by “socialists.”

Tom Courtney, a former state senator and longtime union official, said he thinks more voters than just a decade ago struggle to separate Democrats they know from those who speak nationally for the party. When he sought a comeback campaign last year, his opponents linked him to liberal New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent who ran for president as a Democrat.

“I think there are a large number of people that liked me and my policies, but just didn’t want a Democrat because they didn’t like AOC or didn’t like Bernie Sanders,” Courtney said. “We didn’t fight that national message.”
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
This article doesn't mention things like them attempting to tank our economic recovery nor the persistent propaganda attack (foreign and domestic) that the Republicans have been conducting on us citizens.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/06/01/republican-plot-steal-2024-election/
Screen Shot 2021-06-01 at 3.53.49 PM.png
Republicans have spent nearly seven months making bogus charges of fraud in the 2020 election under the banner of “stop the steal.” Now they have segued into a “start the steal” offensive to ensure that they will win the 2022 and 2024 elections — even if most voters once again support the Democratic Party.

The Brennan Center for Justice reports that “between January 1 and May 14, 2021, at least 14 states enacted 22 new laws that restrict access to the vote” and “at least 61 bills with restrictive provisions are moving through 18 state legislatures.” Those bills are designed not to avert nonexistent voter fraud but to avert another election defeat for Republicans — and they are drawing perilously close to that goal.

In Georgia, for example, a new law stipulates that mobile voting stations “shall only be used in emergencies declared by the Governor,” who is a Republican. That will put out of business two “mobile voting units” — a.k.a. buses — that collected 11,200 ballots in Atlanta’s Fulton County in November. Also, under the new law, provisional ballots will no longer be accepted from voters who go to the wrong polling place; 11,120 provisional ballots were counted in November. “Combined,” writes my Post colleague David Weigel, “the ballots cast by both methods are nearly double the margin by which [Joe] Biden won Georgia.”

A new election law in Texas, which has been temporarily blocked by a walkout of Democrats from the state House, would outlaw many of the methods used to increase minority turnout, such as drive-through voting and early voting before 1 p.m. on Sundays (crimping “souls to the polls” events after church services). But the most alarming element of the bill is that it makes it easier to overturn election results even if there is no evidence that fraud affected the outcome.

The Georgia law, for its part, includes a pernicious provision giving the Republican-controlled state legislature the right to suspend county election officials and to name the chair of the State Election Board. Previously, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger had chaired the board, but he incurred Republican wrath by certifying Biden’s victory. Raffensperger is being challenged next year by a Donald Trump-endorsed opponent, Rep. Jody Hice (R-Ga.), who insists that Trump would have won in Georgia if the election had been “fair.”

Meanwhile, in Arizona — another state Trump narrowly lost — Republicans are trying to strip Secretary of State Katie Hobbs (D) of her power to defend election lawsuits. They want to vest that authority in the Republican attorney general. If she runs again, Hobbs, like Raffensperger, will face an election challenge from an advocate of the “big lie.” Trump die-hards are also running for the secretary of state posts in Nevada and Michigan.If the challengers win, pro-Trump conspiracy theorists will be supervising elections in key swing states.

While GOP efforts are ultimately aimed at the 2024 election, they will first make their impact felt in 2022. Off-year elections are always tough for the party in power. This one will be tougher still because of Republican-driven voter suppression, reapportionment and gerrymandering. Dave Wasserman of the Cook Political Report writes that Republicans will have full authority to redraw 187 congressional districts, while Democrats will control just 75. He estimates that redistricting in just four states — Texas, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina — could be enough to deliver the House to Republican control.

This brings us to a nightmare scenario: a Republican-controlled Congress overturning the 2024 presidential election results to install Trump or a Trump mini-me in the White House. In January, 139 House Republicans and eight Senate Republicans voted not to certify electoral college results in at least one state. Since then, the most prominent GOP opponent of the “big lie," Rep. Liz Cheney (Wyo.), has been purged from the House leadership. Willingness to lie about election fraud has become a litmus test for Republicans, with the implicit threat of mob violence if they don’t go along. Republicans are so scared of Trump and his fanatical followers that most of them just voted against a bipartisan investigation of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

Many congressional Republicans will refuse to certify a 2024 Democratic win in swing states. If Republicans control Congress, they could deny the Democrats an electoral college majority and throw the election to the House — where each state delegation, regardless of population, would cast one ballot. Given that Republicans already control a majority of state delegations, they could override the election outcome. If that happens, it would spell the end of American democracy.

I hope I am being overly alarmist. I really do. But after the storming of the Capitol — and the Republican failure to hold the instigators to account — we have crossed a Rubicon. The best way to protect our electoral system is to pass the For the People Act, which would curb partisan gerrymandering and protect voting rights. Senate Democrats have to choose between saving the filibuster and saving democracy. They can’t do both.
 
Top