I certainly haven't disputed that the buildings had cores. Standing up on their own, though, without the rest of the building--that's nonsense. You have to ignore the engineering details to pretend that the outside walls don't play an essential structural function in a building of that kind of design. 110 stories of structure without the part that resists wind loads?
I was attempting to find some of the early reports, to see what the initial finding were. But, I gave up. History is being re-written, all the while claiming that they are fighting a re-write that happened before the event I guess. So even the raw reports are re-bloomed with commentary. So, this is why Drama cares.
This is largest attempt to ignore science, that the world has seen. I guess this religion is just beginning thanks the interweb and swamp people.
Vanity URl, that says, ScientificAmerican. And they are suppose to be TELLING the truth???
Trust the tree by the fruit. What is the taste of this denial. Bush stole the election.
You believe that because the PUBS had to get SCOTUS to stop Broward Ct. DEMS from conducting yet another recount. They tried to change to recount time limit in the State, put there by DEMS.
So, it was Al Gore that tried to jack the election and SCOTUS wacked his pee-pee.
So, a religion of hate Bush has become a superstition back step and the slack-jaws that have never even seen the building as I have, now want to refute from HATE of a man. Bush isn't Monsanto.
So, rather that show the good parts I will just show the HATE. (and the link) The hate is in red and just some blogger with no facts just a FAKE website and a FAKE hate.
My favorite.....never mind. It is copy protected so the lies can''t be pulled out. Did he have permission from SA to throw in his lies......NO.
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 3"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"] @ 1996-2003 Scientific American, Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.[/TD]
[TD="width: 14, align: left"]
[/TD]
[TD="width: 140, align: center"][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Lies on lies.....fake on fake, to prove a "fake."http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/experts/articles/sciam01/sci_am1.html unreferenced stupidity in
RED.