All You Need To Know About Marijuana Legalization In Canada
- Thread starter WHATFG
- Start date
Egzoset
Well-Known Member
Salutations,
For starters i'd want to suggest a modification of the present title:
Keeping in mind the Liberal's (French vs English) memorable sample of double-talk over "possession" that was displayed for all to see on their electoral platform:
« Nous retirerons la consommation et la possession de marijuana du Code criminel... »
« We will remove marijuana consumption and incidental possession from the Criminal Code... »
By the way i must shead some focus on the fact that even after 1 year in power our national politician star still can't manage to pronounce the "c" word, which is so much more scientific than some reminescences of this dark episode of our history as evoked below:
Google Books: The Black Candle, by Emily F. Murphy (aka Janey Canuck), 1922
XXIII. « Marahuana: A New Menace »
In days when it was OKay for a magistrate (and activist) wearing the St-John of Jerusalem cross to endorse eugenic (sexual sterilisation for the "feeble of mind") theories, in bublic, even years before Adolph Hittler made it a hobby...
That my friends is the real legacy of our "elite" relatively to this mess of epic magnitude!!
(from top to bottom: 1915, 1985, 2004)
Eventually Janey Canuck even got Canadian postal stamps and money printed with her face on it!...
Euh... Back to that specific political platform, considering serious cannabic consumers much prefer their dry flowers to be adequately decarboxylated (cured)... M'well this tells me either only the "incidental" cases will be spared or perhaps it's the version addressed to Québec voters that shall prevail, euh... Ain't this quite convenient having 2 very different possible scenarios as those?!
To me it's no good news to state officially, even before elections day, that only "incidental consumption" will get decriminalized (wait until 2017 i guess, who knows!). And now the ACMPR clarifies this: it is a crime to borrow or share even between those who entered this so-called "medical" system where Trudeau's "mari-caca" remains much too "dangerous" to be anything else (e.g. recreatively legal), so far, while it's still not legally recognized in high court as "medication" and hence taxation is an option right away (more double-standards).
Most people didn't pay much attention when Canada sent an emissary to the United Nations in preparation of UNGASS 2016 in mid-March, the traditional media certainly didn't help with that neither but i noticed all too late that Hillary Geller was actually a non-elected civil servant of the Harper conservative regime... The same failed system under which the mother of a 6 years old boy what instructed by Health Canada that he should SMOKE his prescription... I also recall the alledged "suicide" of Cpl. Ronald J. Francis who was seen on TV nationwide, smoking his legal "medical prescription", wearing his official red uniform with genuine pride...
Honestly i believe we must think of this too when refering to Trudeau's decision to send a bigot anti-cannabic prohibitionist as our representative beyond Canadian borders.
...
Then only 5 months after Canadians chose to elect Justin MiniHarper Trudeau (he voted WITH the conservatives for mandatory prison sentences for growing 6 plants!) yet another tragedy occured: somehow HOMICIDE by POLICE over CANNABIS (235 g of it, gathered from multiple aligned pochets...) happened in a French-speaking area of Montréal in the Québec province (...) while Bill G20 Blair was keeping low-profile in Toronto/Ontario. The victim (ref.: Jean-Pierre Bony, La C.R.A.P.) was blamed, as usual, while it appears he was actually firmly encased within the 4 sides of a window seconds before his head was hit at presumably unsafe distance by what the SPVM-GTi police calls a "cinetic wand", just hours from Aprils 1st - to send a political "message" on planet Itnoc (In The Name Of Children)...
Or maybe he just fell...
The death of this human being caused some turmoil in the streets but most people only saw images of burning cars on late TV news. I never heard any significant expression of concern coming from any official channel since then, not even our politicians in Ottawa's parliament: everyone is confused and seems to think when it comes to cannabis human life auto-magically becomes accessorial/trivial, all the sudden. Go Figure.
Then the week after Trudeau came out with his budget only to make the following statement under a section titled "Enhancing public safety", relatively to his "legaleezation" reform:
Read this whole passage with proper attention then appreciate the juxtapositions! If there were good news then doing something about PTSD was the only progressist item i could identify nonetheless.
{ next: part 2 of 2 }
For starters i'd want to suggest a modification of the present title:
« All you need to know about marijuana "Legaleezation" in Canada »
Keeping in mind the Liberal's (French vs English) memorable sample of double-talk over "possession" that was displayed for all to see on their electoral platform:
« Nous retirerons la consommation et la possession de marijuana du Code criminel... »
« We will remove marijuana consumption and incidental possession from the Criminal Code... »
Google Books: The Black Candle, by Emily F. Murphy (aka Janey Canuck), 1922
XXIII. « Marahuana: A New Menace »
That my friends is the real legacy of our "elite" relatively to this mess of epic magnitude!!
(from top to bottom: 1915, 1985, 2004)
Euh... Back to that specific political platform, considering serious cannabic consumers much prefer their dry flowers to be adequately decarboxylated (cured)... M'well this tells me either only the "incidental" cases will be spared or perhaps it's the version addressed to Québec voters that shall prevail, euh... Ain't this quite convenient having 2 very different possible scenarios as those?!
To me it's no good news to state officially, even before elections day, that only "incidental consumption" will get decriminalized (wait until 2017 i guess, who knows!). And now the ACMPR clarifies this: it is a crime to borrow or share even between those who entered this so-called "medical" system where Trudeau's "mari-caca" remains much too "dangerous" to be anything else (e.g. recreatively legal), so far, while it's still not legally recognized in high court as "medication" and hence taxation is an option right away (more double-standards).
Most people didn't pay much attention when Canada sent an emissary to the United Nations in preparation of UNGASS 2016 in mid-March, the traditional media certainly didn't help with that neither but i noticed all too late that Hillary Geller was actually a non-elected civil servant of the Harper conservative regime... The same failed system under which the mother of a 6 years old boy what instructed by Health Canada that he should SMOKE his prescription... I also recall the alledged "suicide" of Cpl. Ronald J. Francis who was seen on TV nationwide, smoking his legal "medical prescription", wearing his official red uniform with genuine pride...
...
Then only 5 months after Canadians chose to elect Justin MiniHarper Trudeau (he voted WITH the conservatives for mandatory prison sentences for growing 6 plants!) yet another tragedy occured: somehow HOMICIDE by POLICE over CANNABIS (235 g of it, gathered from multiple aligned pochets...) happened in a French-speaking area of Montréal in the Québec province (...) while Bill G20 Blair was keeping low-profile in Toronto/Ontario. The victim (ref.: Jean-Pierre Bony, La C.R.A.P.) was blamed, as usual, while it appears he was actually firmly encased within the 4 sides of a window seconds before his head was hit at presumably unsafe distance by what the SPVM-GTi police calls a "cinetic wand", just hours from Aprils 1st - to send a political "message" on planet Itnoc (In The Name Of Children)...
The death of this human being caused some turmoil in the streets but most people only saw images of burning cars on late TV news. I never heard any significant expression of concern coming from any official channel since then, not even our politicians in Ottawa's parliament: everyone is confused and seems to think when it comes to cannabis human life auto-magically becomes accessorial/trivial, all the sudden. Go Figure.
Then the week after Trudeau came out with his budget only to make the following statement under a section titled "Enhancing public safety", relatively to his "legaleezation" reform:
http://www.budget.gc.ca/2016/docs/plan/budget2016-en.pdf (search around page 184, YMMV!)
« ...ensuring public safety officers have the support and treatment they need when facing post-traumatic stress disorder... »
Read this whole passage with proper attention then appreciate the juxtapositions! If there were good news then doing something about PTSD was the only progressist item i could identify nonetheless.
{ next: part 2 of 2 }
Last edited:
Egzoset
Well-Known Member
{ part 2 of 2 }
Meanwhile this didn't prevent the new wizard Jane Philpott to shine at UNGASS 2016 a fews weeks later in New York, with Bill G20 Blair practically speechless and even invisible, Trudeau waiting 2 days with his boxer pants and gloves ready for camera sessions - e.g. can't be bothered even after a most crucial event...
« Our approach to drugs must be comprehensive, collaborative and compassionate. It must respect human rights while promoting sheer responsability, and it must have a firm scientific foundation. In Canada we will apply these principles with regards to "mari-wana". To that end we will be introducing legislation in the spring of 2017 that insures that we keep "Marie Ouana" out of the hands of children, and profits out of the hands of criminals. While this plan challenges the status-quo in many countries we are convinced it is the best way to protect our youth, while enhancing public safety. Canada will continue to modernize our approach to drug policy. Our work will embrace upstream prevention, compassionate treatment and harm reduction. »
Unfortunately traditional media only echoed the ambiguous propaganda without providing a suitable perspective. The day after here's what came out, with next to zero relevant coverage by traditional media:
Global Commission on Drug Policy Press Conference (2016-Apr-21)
Louise Arbour (Canada) segments: 13:25 to 18:39, 35:19 to 36:33 and 57:13 to 1:00:06.
AlterNet: Global Commission Slams UN Drug Summit Outcome as Straining the Credibility of International Law (2016-Apr-21)
« Louise Arbour, a former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and former Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, outlined the choice now faced by nations determined to do better for their citizens. Countries that want to pursue policies like marijuana legalization, drug decriminalization or heroin-assisted treatment, she said, either have to denounce the international conventions — a “very serious move that could encourage other countries to walk away from other international commitments” — or else, “pretend they’re in compliance, which we know they’re not.”
The UN’s confirmation that countries must continue to work with “this repressive framework” is “a pretty sobering statement for people like me, who have always worked within legal systems,” she said.
She later elaborated to The Influence. “The system is punishing itself.” It’s not that she fears international consequences for countries that enact drug policy reforms, she explained, but a question of a destabilizing threat to the credibility of international law. “If states start cheating at the margins, it erodes the effort to have a cohesive system.” »
Public statement by the Global Commission on Drug Policy on UNGASS 2016 (April 21st)
[ http://www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/publicstatementforGCDP.pdf ]
Then we waited patiently for the ultimatum of August 24 to pass, only to learn much later and bit by bit that the ACMPR might be a temporary program (i still don't buy!) while alternate sources finally complained that more rights were under attack - again: conditional access depending on past judiciary records for "drug offences" going back as far as 10 years... Seeds/plants distribution exclusively reserved to HC-endorsed LPs, limitations like 2 outdoor plants or 5 indoors while these must account for every gram of the "drug", possession set to 30 days of supply maximum (or 150 g, whichever less), yields expected to reach 250 g per plant outdoor or 30 g if inside, all this conditional to an absence of children nearby (practically anywhere one can be found, just name it), euh... Ah, and daily consumption needs to be defined 1 year in advance, with anual re-evaluations more necessary than ever; plus the legal obligation to inform HC of « storage location » in case of transport (that would be a "jar" i think)...
Never mind about those most concerned, considerations relative to "exotic" (High-CBD) genetics, proper curing, etc. can wait.
Recently Ottawa's police chief Charles Bordeleau said he will only welcome « legitimate complaints » (targetting dispensaries), which i see as an admission that there's been not so legitimate complaints before after all!... Etc., etc.
To top it all i almost forgot to include EXTRADITION over LIFE SENTENCES (ref.: Michael Woods, Gaetan Dinelle) that took place near the begining of 2016 as i recall, etc., etc.
Oh, and even more recently in Montréal, seen on late TV news - just a few days ago (!):
Kevin Sabet, SAM
Nora Volkow, NIDA
Guess what sort of "experts" have been invited to Montréal's so-called "scientific" gathering, with subjects like these to entertain some audience of international reputation (...):
And of course Kevin tried to plug his own book($), etc...
Obviously in Canada (and beyond) there's quite a lot more which remains to be communicated and understood than one would typically suspect. Starting with the fact that it was the Liberals who launched the national ban of "Indian Hemp" in 1923, through denial of a democratic debate (déjà vu!!), under the authority of Henri-Sévérin Béland - a doctor/politician by the way! The next couple years later yet another brave Canuck senator presided at the League of Nations where a international treaty was created (ref.: "Geneva Opium Convention") that would spread the ban across the Commonwealth, under authority of the British Empire while Canada was still a Dominion (actually in Québec the "evil" weed was declared "poison" besides cyanure and whatnot under Queen Victoria as soon as 1985, in "annexe A" of the "Loi de Pharmacie")...
In other words Trudeau just like his father wishes the name to be remembered in history books so he naturally chose Liberal tradition over "stoner" individuals; it would have been difficult for him to state that his political party has been wrong for nearly a century anyway!! Now keep in mind he needs to continue seducing those who once voted for today's opposition in Ottawa!...
Last but not least, there's the matter of Michel and Margaret Trudeau during the electoral campaign: does Justin blame cannabis for his mother's bi-polarity, and/or his brother's death (who happened to be scheduled to appear in court for a case of possession!)...
So in conclusion Trudeau speaks from both side of his mouth even better than his famous predecessor Jean Chrétien. But that's only me.
Good day, have fun!!
Meanwhile this didn't prevent the new wizard Jane Philpott to shine at UNGASS 2016 a fews weeks later in New York, with Bill G20 Blair practically speechless and even invisible, Trudeau waiting 2 days with his boxer pants and gloves ready for camera sessions - e.g. can't be bothered even after a most crucial event...
« Our approach to drugs must be comprehensive, collaborative and compassionate. It must respect human rights while promoting sheer responsability, and it must have a firm scientific foundation. In Canada we will apply these principles with regards to "mari-wana". To that end we will be introducing legislation in the spring of 2017 that insures that we keep "Marie Ouana" out of the hands of children, and profits out of the hands of criminals. While this plan challenges the status-quo in many countries we are convinced it is the best way to protect our youth, while enhancing public safety. Canada will continue to modernize our approach to drug policy. Our work will embrace upstream prevention, compassionate treatment and harm reduction. »
Global Commission on Drug Policy Press Conference (2016-Apr-21)
Louise Arbour (Canada) segments: 13:25 to 18:39, 35:19 to 36:33 and 57:13 to 1:00:06.
AlterNet: Global Commission Slams UN Drug Summit Outcome as Straining the Credibility of International Law (2016-Apr-21)
« Louise Arbour, a former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and former Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, outlined the choice now faced by nations determined to do better for their citizens. Countries that want to pursue policies like marijuana legalization, drug decriminalization or heroin-assisted treatment, she said, either have to denounce the international conventions — a “very serious move that could encourage other countries to walk away from other international commitments” — or else, “pretend they’re in compliance, which we know they’re not.”
The UN’s confirmation that countries must continue to work with “this repressive framework” is “a pretty sobering statement for people like me, who have always worked within legal systems,” she said.
She later elaborated to The Influence. “The system is punishing itself.” It’s not that she fears international consequences for countries that enact drug policy reforms, she explained, but a question of a destabilizing threat to the credibility of international law. “If states start cheating at the margins, it erodes the effort to have a cohesive system.” »
Public statement by the Global Commission on Drug Policy on UNGASS 2016 (April 21st)
[ http://www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/publicstatementforGCDP.pdf ]
Never mind about those most concerned, considerations relative to "exotic" (High-CBD) genetics, proper curing, etc. can wait.
Recently Ottawa's police chief Charles Bordeleau said he will only welcome « legitimate complaints » (targetting dispensaries), which i see as an admission that there's been not so legitimate complaints before after all!... Etc., etc.
To top it all i almost forgot to include EXTRADITION over LIFE SENTENCES (ref.: Michael Woods, Gaetan Dinelle) that took place near the begining of 2016 as i recall, etc., etc.
Oh, and even more recently in Montréal, seen on late TV news - just a few days ago (!):
Kevin Sabet, SAM
Nora Volkow, NIDA
Obviously in Canada (and beyond) there's quite a lot more which remains to be communicated and understood than one would typically suspect. Starting with the fact that it was the Liberals who launched the national ban of "Indian Hemp" in 1923, through denial of a democratic debate (déjà vu!!), under the authority of Henri-Sévérin Béland - a doctor/politician by the way! The next couple years later yet another brave Canuck senator presided at the League of Nations where a international treaty was created (ref.: "Geneva Opium Convention") that would spread the ban across the Commonwealth, under authority of the British Empire while Canada was still a Dominion (actually in Québec the "evil" weed was declared "poison" besides cyanure and whatnot under Queen Victoria as soon as 1985, in "annexe A" of the "Loi de Pharmacie")...
In other words Trudeau just like his father wishes the name to be remembered in history books so he naturally chose Liberal tradition over "stoner" individuals; it would have been difficult for him to state that his political party has been wrong for nearly a century anyway!! Now keep in mind he needs to continue seducing those who once voted for today's opposition in Ottawa!...
Last but not least, there's the matter of Michel and Margaret Trudeau during the electoral campaign: does Justin blame cannabis for his mother's bi-polarity, and/or his brother's death (who happened to be scheduled to appear in court for a case of possession!)...
So in conclusion Trudeau speaks from both side of his mouth even better than his famous predecessor Jean Chrétien. But that's only me.
Good day, have fun!!
Last edited:
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
Maybe you're confused? The only party talking decriminalization during the election was the NDP. The Liberals promised LEGALIZATION and that is what we are going to get. What, exactly is 'incidental consumption' anyway? Is that what happens when you walk into a room that has recently been hot-boxed?
Every adult Canadian will be able to purchase, possess, consume, and most likely produce a limited amount of cannabis for personal use...and share with friends. Think home made wine or beer. All without fear of prosecution. What part of that is terrible? It is illegal to share now because it is still a controlled substance...you can't share your oxy's either.
Somehow I don't think your rant was really about cannabis at all....
Egzoset
Well-Known Member
Salutations VianarChris,
You, you, you...
...
Which still says nothing about the rest, like MURDER in DISGUISE by POLICE over Justin's "Mari-Caca", for example. I'm not genuinely surprized, it's just business as usual. There are suffering patients taken hostage to support an artificial predatory system defined as the frontier between good and evil, so i can imagine how that hurts to provide a legal signature to the bigots in exchanged for something they stole us in the very 1st place. I do care for those too, yano, immensely - but i still can't excuse the KILL with nobody accountable while the matter went hidden under many carpet layers, silently in the most shocking indifference.
Good day, have fun!!
Maybe you forgot to address the chain of events and prefered to focus on the messenger instead of the message.
You, you, you...
There's an even more fundamental question to ask considering the nature of that text: why "incidental" in English ONLY if not a political strategy meant to keep even the most disparate options opened??
...
Which still says nothing about the rest, like MURDER in DISGUISE by POLICE over Justin's "Mari-Caca", for example. I'm not genuinely surprized, it's just business as usual. There are suffering patients taken hostage to support an artificial predatory system defined as the frontier between good and evil, so i can imagine how that hurts to provide a legal signature to the bigots in exchanged for something they stole us in the very 1st place. I do care for those too, yano, immensely - but i still can't excuse the KILL with nobody accountable while the matter went hidden under many carpet layers, silently in the most shocking indifference.
In your dreams, but i'll admit i'd hardly object to day-dreaming anyway!
Now who's the most confused, i might as well think this sounds like i'm the prohibitionist here! Or have we met before, you with a different alias perhaps?
And it's on the "schedule" (above Ritalin) because of the events i just tried to put in perspective, in pure vain. That's called voluntary blindness IMHO. See you around in 2019, when it's too late. Once again.
Good day, have fun!!
CalyxCrusher
Well-Known Member
Do you own a fedora by chance?
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
Just another idiot. Sure writes alot for someone with fuck-all to say.
CalyxCrusher
Well-Known Member
Exactly this
Egzoset
Well-Known Member
Hi again,
You, you, you. Me, me, me.
Although i was expecting as much determination from people who voted for Harper, Trudeau - or even both... Actually i must confess how sorry i feel for the future reader who happened to trust the present title above was really announcing what's actually on the menu, as a leading subject: e.g. so-called "medical mari-caca" in Canada, so far... Nobody seems concerned at the simple thought that it's now criminalized by law to even "share" between hostages of the HC-endorsed ACMPR program - which by the way could as well have just been left to die by Trudeau anyway as it was declared unconstitutional in a Canuck court of justice. Instead we got what i just described in my initial reply, without any echo. Looking at the 1-liner which preceeded and the trashing work it's certainly a waste of my time and energy trying to educate YOU.
You, you, you.
Or maybe it's simply meant to evoke emotions. In a supposedly rational context... Confused, hey?
But i care about the reader, and you know what? I also care a great deal about the "medical" patients - even the "children" of planet Itnoc, especially those ones i might add. But i'm no cap'tain Canada and explaining such things feels so trivial at the moment; which reminds me why i didn't visit the place for a long while. Some things never evolve for the best i'm afraid.
M'well, what more is there to "rant" about which sounds relative to the ACMPR exactly? Euh...
Ah yes. While i observe radio silence on, euh... Your side. (You, you, you...) Euh... There's something i just can't deceipher about the logical consequences of criminalizing (more severely) the act of sharing for the legit registered patients after the, oh... aHummm... Yet-to-come, euh... 2017 revision of, euh... Trudeau's "legaleezation" reform (read yet one more "fix" of bigot anti-cannabic prohibition)!!
Please, dear reader, lets now imagine this for a second...
The poor sod who suffers incognito on his hospital bed needs to phone HC everytime he takes his precious 30-day cured (at most) cannabic jar with him to the toilet room, meanwhile a group of dudes dancing with the Emery couple in Vancouver can pass the joint (or dab!) no questions asked. Hummm... Seems to me the next promise of his father's son should be to undo what he has done himself during his 1st mandate, euh... Confused, YOU think?? Think again, maybe politicians are dumb but i won't fall for it, this one ain't the inoffensive joker people like to support. It would help this miserable sample of a RollIt-Up "debate", i'm sorry to note, if if the reader could at least expect to read the rest of my story on more of those jokes, to be honest.
Euh...
M'well, i've been chased around on "social" media for 7 years now and it seems the old wars never die, beware dear reader, as *1* single revenge is never sufficient. They need more beyond total anihilation, etc. It turns out i was quite ready to cut the wires that give life to Egzoset a long while ago already. It's somewhat late. So, hurting on-line reputations by importing forged reputations may be what generates the [ CLICKS ] around here but the thing is i still care for those readers who clicked hoping to get informed on the situation of "medical" cannabis in Canada today; i've provided a fair amount of links to sustain some mature discussions already, i invite YOU to put ME on YOUR [ IGNORE ] list so the extra noise can be silenced for the benefit of all those genuinely concerned.
Now try to connect A to B to C, starting with the bigot anti-cannabic prohibitionists. In Québec nearly a year ago that would be:
Do YOU even care to learn why?...
Madame Lucie Charlebois, the minister who's reponsible for our vulnerable minors in Québec (...), has created a law (#44) which puts on a same level toxic tobacco/nicotine/paper/glue SMOKING vs e-Cigs/e-Liquids (despite their value as healthier substitutes) vs vaporizers (the most healthy consumption method of all 3!)... A touching story with some nice intrigue at the key! Idiot, hey?... In a house of mirrors.
Which brings me to this case of a guy we saw at Découverte on SRC (Radio-Canada) a couple years ago...
Guess what, he's got a mandate to run some research on CBD:
M'yeap! But YOU won't agree *THAT* is what the reader normaly came here for, right??
I hope it doesn't matter that i shall not translate to top that.
And yet lets add this which occured quite recently in Montréal, as i tried to explain as clearly as possible (given the circumstances), in my previous post:
Too bad YOU still can't resist obstructing the discussion (euh... Once this guy was subsided by Big-Pharma, for example!)...
Even as i persist in completing the picture, with a multitude of details that went to the trash bin because of the alias Egzoset. It really doesn't take much of that "visibility" to pull the trigger, like it's a cheap chatting game focussed on insults - though as if YOUR life depended on it like there was no tomorrow, euh... Confused, i know.
M'well lets make it clear right away that i don't have anything to trade or sell, nor do i grow, even less work in the piss industry! Competition lies elsewhere.
In any case... WOW!! So much focus put on a member who's just not posting anymore - and so little motivation to behave as nearly-decent human beings. Have it your way, get judged by your peers.
...
Yano, i decided i wouldn't let the darkness invade my heart because someone dear to me once explained that once it's inflitrating inside there's no going back, and YOU're not taking me there. You'd need more pull than you think. Like it or not YOU're powerless at destroying ideas. You, you, you.
Which in some manner reminds me of the brief answer of Trudeau to this famous French-speaking TV animator (TLMEP in Québec) who asked it that wasn't feeling good listening at music (under "influence")...
And here's what SuperTéteux declared while he had managed to capture a monster audit on premium hours, available coast-to-coast across the nation (for those who don't hate Québec):
I'll translate in my own way for your convenience: « Only the others would know, i sure wouldn't!... » Or put differently, « Don't ask me, not me! »... With the fear of monster as roots in the background.
Personally that night i found this was an hypocryt with ZERO political spine and much less courage, unworthy of being Prime Minister. Not even capable/willing to do the after-math, if you see what i mean!
Ouf!... Vitement que je crisse mon camp... Enfin, c'est pas trop tôt.
Good day, have fun!!
You, you, you. Me, me, me.
Although i was expecting as much determination from people who voted for Harper, Trudeau - or even both... Actually i must confess how sorry i feel for the future reader who happened to trust the present title above was really announcing what's actually on the menu, as a leading subject: e.g. so-called "medical mari-caca" in Canada, so far... Nobody seems concerned at the simple thought that it's now criminalized by law to even "share" between hostages of the HC-endorsed ACMPR program - which by the way could as well have just been left to die by Trudeau anyway as it was declared unconstitutional in a Canuck court of justice. Instead we got what i just described in my initial reply, without any echo. Looking at the 1-liner which preceeded and the trashing work it's certainly a waste of my time and energy trying to educate YOU.
You, you, you.
Or maybe it's simply meant to evoke emotions. In a supposedly rational context... Confused, hey?
But i care about the reader, and you know what? I also care a great deal about the "medical" patients - even the "children" of planet Itnoc, especially those ones i might add. But i'm no cap'tain Canada and explaining such things feels so trivial at the moment; which reminds me why i didn't visit the place for a long while. Some things never evolve for the best i'm afraid.
M'well, what more is there to "rant" about which sounds relative to the ACMPR exactly? Euh...
Ah yes. While i observe radio silence on, euh... Your side. (You, you, you...) Euh... There's something i just can't deceipher about the logical consequences of criminalizing (more severely) the act of sharing for the legit registered patients after the, oh... aHummm... Yet-to-come, euh... 2017 revision of, euh... Trudeau's "legaleezation" reform (read yet one more "fix" of bigot anti-cannabic prohibition)!!
Please, dear reader, lets now imagine this for a second...
So, what have we got here?...
The poor sod who suffers incognito on his hospital bed needs to phone HC everytime he takes his precious 30-day cured (at most) cannabic jar with him to the toilet room, meanwhile a group of dudes dancing with the Emery couple in Vancouver can pass the joint (or dab!) no questions asked. Hummm... Seems to me the next promise of his father's son should be to undo what he has done himself during his 1st mandate, euh... Confused, YOU think?? Think again, maybe politicians are dumb but i won't fall for it, this one ain't the inoffensive joker people like to support. It would help this miserable sample of a RollIt-Up "debate", i'm sorry to note, if if the reader could at least expect to read the rest of my story on more of those jokes, to be honest.
Euh...
M'well, i've been chased around on "social" media for 7 years now and it seems the old wars never die, beware dear reader, as *1* single revenge is never sufficient. They need more beyond total anihilation, etc. It turns out i was quite ready to cut the wires that give life to Egzoset a long while ago already. It's somewhat late. So, hurting on-line reputations by importing forged reputations may be what generates the [ CLICKS ] around here but the thing is i still care for those readers who clicked hoping to get informed on the situation of "medical" cannabis in Canada today; i've provided a fair amount of links to sustain some mature discussions already, i invite YOU to put ME on YOUR [ IGNORE ] list so the extra noise can be silenced for the benefit of all those genuinely concerned.
Think COP6 (FCTC) in Russia a couple years ago, i don't suppose YOU know what connection there is to be made in here though... Here's a clue: it's about US and THEM (for a change!)...
Madame Lucie Charlebois, the minister who's reponsible for our vulnerable minors in Québec (...), has created a law (#44) which puts on a same level toxic tobacco/nicotine/paper/glue SMOKING vs e-Cigs/e-Liquids (despite their value as healthier substitutes) vs vaporizers (the most healthy consumption method of all 3!)... A touching story with some nice intrigue at the key! Idiot, hey?... In a house of mirrors.
Which brings me to this case of a guy we saw at Découverte on SRC (Radio-Canada) a couple years ago...
Guess what, he's got a mandate to run some research on CBD:
M'yeap! But YOU won't agree *THAT* is what the reader normaly came here for, right??
I hope it doesn't matter that i shall not translate to top that.
And yet lets add this which occured quite recently in Montréal, as i tried to explain as clearly as possible (given the circumstances), in my previous post:
Even as i persist in completing the picture, with a multitude of details that went to the trash bin because of the alias Egzoset. It really doesn't take much of that "visibility" to pull the trigger, like it's a cheap chatting game focussed on insults - though as if YOUR life depended on it like there was no tomorrow, euh... Confused, i know.
M'well lets make it clear right away that i don't have anything to trade or sell, nor do i grow, even less work in the piss industry! Competition lies elsewhere.
In any case... WOW!! So much focus put on a member who's just not posting anymore - and so little motivation to behave as nearly-decent human beings. Have it your way, get judged by your peers.
...
Yano, i decided i wouldn't let the darkness invade my heart because someone dear to me once explained that once it's inflitrating inside there's no going back, and YOU're not taking me there. You'd need more pull than you think. Like it or not YOU're powerless at destroying ideas. You, you, you.
Which in some manner reminds me of the brief answer of Trudeau to this famous French-speaking TV animator (TLMEP in Québec) who asked it that wasn't feeling good listening at music (under "influence")...
And here's what SuperTéteux declared while he had managed to capture a monster audit on premium hours, available coast-to-coast across the nation (for those who don't hate Québec):
Personally that night i found this was an hypocryt with ZERO political spine and much less courage, unworthy of being Prime Minister. Not even capable/willing to do the after-math, if you see what i mean!
While YOU pretend its "rant" just because YOU say so, euh... It's funny how the most relevant points of this whole thread are systematically rejected so far, hence i'd argue the feeling is more than reciprocal, naturally. Tell your friends they're making themselves a bit too obvious for good taste. But i don't really care, after all. Only for the readers, m'well... Déjà vu: it works on planet Itnoc with the "dangers" of Trudeau's mari-caca, doesn't it?! Don't worry, the real readers who arrive from elsewhere than a hive for hate-lovers/love-haters don't need YOUR guidance to decode factual events recorded by history as demonstrated here - despite YOUR insistance to divert spotlights in the other direction...
Ouf!... Vitement que je crisse mon camp... Enfin, c'est pas trop tôt.
Good day, have fun!!
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
The points in your post were rejected because they are nonsensical. You seem stuck on the idea that the ACMPR has somehow changed the rules regarding sharing your medicine, yet that has ALWAYS been the case. You have not written one word that would convince me or any other sane adult that having cannabis removed from the cdsa, removing penalties for personal possession, consumption and cultivation is not going to become the reality. Nothing you wrote deserves a response...maybe pm Dizzy if you are looking for validation. Where did I mention anything about me? asswipe. Nice try at trolling, but you really, really suck at it. Either that or you are actually that stupid. You.You.You. Yes...You....dipshit
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
And fuck off with the french...Sprechen Sie Englisch oder verwenden Sie ein anderes Forum. Wir denken, Sie sind ein guter, verstehen?
OLD MOTHER SATIVA
Well-Known Member
quote:and most likely produce a limited amount of cannabis
>now its "most likely"..?
and thats right..when frustrated..go to a swearin'.[bully]....class act
>now its "most likely"..?
and thats right..when frustrated..go to a swearin'.[bully]....class act
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
Who fucking asked for your opinion? It's ALWAYS been 'most likely'...I won't be able to claim it as fact until the spring...about the same time you and the like-minded slither into the woodwork to avoid admitting how ridiculously wrong you were. I have never said my prediction was a done deal, just a rational, thought out opinion. You seem to compensate for your piss poor reading comprehension skills by being a bully...
I'm the bully? Did you forget to read what I was responding to...oh that's right... details, facts, common sense and reality aren't really important to you when it gets in the way of your irrational conspiracy thinking, huh? The closer we get to legal cannabis, the more vocal you get about how the government is coming after pot smokers... yet everything is pointing to the exact opposite. Tell ya what, since you obviously aren't interested in having an intelligent conversation, how about you just stay the fuck out of my conversations.
OLD MOTHER SATIVA
Well-Known Member
".I won't be able to claim it as fact until the spring.."<--hilarious..i will know when the sun rose tomorrow after it does..
"how about you just stay the fuck out of my conversations.[/QUOTE]<--hardly a conversation..
you butted into someones post and next thing you arecalling him an ass wipe..class act
and maybe YOU should just stfu when some one else posts something..
and just go back to your news cut and pastes..where you won't get so but hurt if someone
dares talk about the libs or basically anything that you do not agree with..
you are a rude attempted bully ..who when slightly pressured ..goes over the deep end...
i just get tired of you jumping all over people who have a different opinion..
[ok..now back to the led forum..]
Last edited:
CalyxCrusher
Well-Known Member
Hi again,
You, you, you. Me, me, me.
Although i was expecting as much determination from people who voted for Harper, Trudeau - or even both... Actually i must confess how sorry i feel for the future reader who happened to trust the present title above was really announcing what's actually on the menu, as a leading subject: e.g. so-called "medical mari-caca" in Canada, so far... Nobody seems concerned at the simple thought that it's now criminalized by law to even "share" between hostages of the HC-endorsed ACMPR program - which by the way could as well have just been left to die by Trudeau anyway as it was declared unconstitutional in a Canuck court of justice. Instead we got what i just described in my initial reply, without any echo. Looking at the 1-liner which preceeded and the trashing work it's certainly a waste of my time and energy trying to educate YOU.
You, you, you.
Or maybe it's simply meant to evoke emotions. In a supposedly rational context... Confused, hey?
But i care about the reader, and you know what? I also care a great deal about the "medical" patients - even the "children" of planet Itnoc, especially those ones i might add. But i'm no cap'tain Canada and explaining such things feels so trivial at the moment; which reminds me why i didn't visit the place for a long while. Some things never evolve for the best i'm afraid.
M'well, what more is there to "rant" about which sounds relative to the ACMPR exactly? Euh...
Ah yes. While i observe radio silence on, euh... Your side. (You, you, you...) Euh... There's something i just can't deceipher about the logical consequences of criminalizing (more severely) the act of sharing for the legit registered patients after the, oh... aHummm... Yet-to-come, euh... 2017 revision of, euh... Trudeau's "legaleezation" reform (read yet one more "fix" of bigot anti-cannabic prohibition)!!
Please, dear reader, lets now imagine this for a second...
So, what have we got here?...
The poor sod who suffers incognito on his hospital bed needs to phone HC everytime he takes his precious 30-day cured (at most) cannabic jar with him to the toilet room, meanwhile a group of dudes dancing with the Emery couple in Vancouver can pass the joint (or dab!) no questions asked. Hummm... Seems to me the next promise of his father's son should be to undo what he has done himself during his 1st mandate, euh... Confused, YOU think?? Think again, maybe politicians are dumb but i won't fall for it, this one ain't the inoffensive joker people like to support. It would help this miserable sample of a RollIt-Up "debate", i'm sorry to note, if if the reader could at least expect to read the rest of my story on more of those jokes, to be honest.
Euh...
M'well, i've been chased around on "social" media for 7 years now and it seems the old wars never die, beware dear reader, as *1* single revenge is never sufficient. They need more beyond total anihilation, etc. It turns out i was quite ready to cut the wires that give life to Egzoset a long while ago already. It's somewhat late. So, hurting on-line reputations by importing forged reputations may be what generates the [ CLICKS ] around here but the thing is i still care for those readers who clicked hoping to get informed on the situation of "medical" cannabis in Canada today; i've provided a fair amount of links to sustain some mature discussions already, i invite YOU to put ME on YOUR [ IGNORE ] list so the extra noise can be silenced for the benefit of all those genuinely concerned.
Think COP6 (FCTC) in Russia a couple years ago, i don't suppose YOU know what connection there is to be made in here though... Here's a clue: it's about US and THEM (for a change!)...
Now try to connect A to B to C, starting with the bigot anti-cannabic prohibitionists. In Québec nearly a year ago that would be:
Do YOU even care to learn why?...
Madame Lucie Charlebois, the minister who's reponsible for our vulnerable minors in Québec (...), has created a law (#44) which puts on a same level toxic tobacco/nicotine/paper/glue SMOKING vs e-Cigs/e-Liquids (despite their value as healthier substitutes) vs vaporizers (the most healthy consumption method of all 3!)... A touching story with some nice intrigue at the key! Idiot, hey?... In a house of mirrors.
Which brings me to this case of a guy we saw at Découverte on SRC (Radio-Canada) a couple years ago...
Guess what, he's got a mandate to run some research on CBD:
M'yeap! But YOU won't agree *THAT* is what the reader normaly came here for, right??
I hope it doesn't matter that i shall not translate to top that.
And yet lets add this which occured quite recently in Montréal, as i tried to explain as clearly as possible (given the circumstances), in my previous post:
Too bad YOU still can't resist obstructing the discussion (euh... Once this guy was subsided by Big-Pharma, for example!)...
Even as i persist in completing the picture, with a multitude of details that went to the trash bin because of the alias Egzoset. It really doesn't take much of that "visibility" to pull the trigger, like it's a cheap chatting game focussed on insults - though as if YOUR life depended on it like there was no tomorrow, euh... Confused, i know.
M'well lets make it clear right away that i don't have anything to trade or sell, nor do i grow, even less work in the piss industry! Competition lies elsewhere.
In any case... WOW!! So much focus put on a member who's just not posting anymore - and so little motivation to behave as nearly-decent human beings. Have it your way, get judged by your peers.
...
Yano, i decided i wouldn't let the darkness invade my heart because someone dear to me once explained that once it's inflitrating inside there's no going back, and YOU're not taking me there. You'd need more pull than you think. Like it or not YOU're powerless at destroying ideas. You, you, you.
Which in some manner reminds me of the brief answer of Trudeau to this famous French-speaking TV animator (TLMEP in Québec) who asked it that wasn't feeling good listening at music (under "influence")...
And here's what SuperTéteux declared while he had managed to capture a monster audit on premium hours, available coast-to-coast across the nation (for those who don't hate Québec):
I'll translate in my own way for your convenience: « Only the others would know, i sure wouldn't!... » Or put differently, « Don't ask me, not me! »... With the fear of monster as roots in the background.
Personally that night i found this was an hypocryt with ZERO political spine and much less courage, unworthy of being Prime Minister. Not even capable/willing to do the after-math, if you see what i mean!
While YOU pretend its "rant" just because YOU say so, euh... It's funny how the most relevant points of this whole thread are systematically rejected so far, hence i'd argue the feeling is more than reciprocal, naturally. Tell your friends they're making themselves a bit too obvious for good taste. But i don't really care, after all. Only for the readers, m'well... Déjà vu: it works on planet Itnoc with the "dangers" of Trudeau's mari-caca, doesn't it?! Don't worry, the real readers who arrive from elsewhere than a hive for hate-lovers/love-haters don't need YOUR guidance to decode factual events recorded by history as demonstrated here - despite YOUR insistance to divert spotlights in the other direction...
Ouf!... Vitement que je crisse mon camp... Enfin, c'est pas trop tôt.
Good day, have fun!!
I figured you'd try harder at trolling. I guess you must have gotten lazy with your trolling over time as it seems you just copy and paste the same drivel across multiple cannabis forums on the internet in more than one language. I'm sure along with M'well and M'yeap, you also use M'lady a lot too.
Last edited:
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
You really are a fucking idiot, aren't you. Ever notice that you take the side of every troll, conspiracy theorist and anti-goverment whack-job who posts on here? I didn't jump on anyone until they jumped at me first. Unlike what you just did. Need help finding your ignore button, fool? Thank you for going back to the LED forum...you havin' a big discussion over there about how the Liberals are going to make grow lights illegal? Or are you too busy telling others what they are permitted to post? If you're involved in the conversation, I'm sure it's riveting.