An interpretation on Christianity

Intro

What does one mans ideas on religion have to do with the religion itself? You will find many different views and many of them will contradict each other and themselves.

Do you understand why this is? It's because religion isn't a science. It's our history and people are deciphering it in any way they can.

There is evidence of many biblical events having actually occurred. In fact, a lot of what we teach about ancient history today comes from biblical scripture. Many think the tales have been over exaggerated and that is understandable.

A lot of issues with today's standard Christianity beliefs stem from too many ignorant people interpreting and spreading the knowledge in the bible. They pick and choose. Read only one line from a paragraph. Believe in things that weren't meant to be believed in.

But there is legitimacy to biblical scripture. The prophets and Jesus' writings should be understood as the actual words of God. All else is from mans interpretation.

2 Peter 1:20Above all, you must realize that no prophecy in Scripture ever came from the prophet’s own understanding,h21or from human initiative. No, those prophets were moved by the Holy Spirit, and they spoke from God.

Even Moses' books would be his interpretation according to the Jewish belief that Moses wrote his books himself. Jews worship him as a God among men almost. But they forget even he was unworthy to enter the promised land.
http://www.gotquestions.org/Moses-promised-land.html

All that being said, this is just my understanding of things. Please post constructive criticism if you feel I am in the wrong. I don't claim to know all the answer, or even a tenth of them.

Heaven

Most churches will tell you that if you are good you go to heaven and if you are bad you go to hell. Or something along those lines anyway.

But where is that said by the prophets or Jesus? This has been mans interpretation too. In fact, the righteous are not going to heaven at all.

Heaven is where Enoch ascended to. To live among and judge the chrildren of heaven. The children of heaven sounds like something you won't hear about in the Bible. But the Dead Sea Scrolls seem to agree that the 3 books of Enoch hold some truth after all. Besides being referenced by Jude the half brother of Jesus.

Jesus also ascended to heaven after his resurrection. And it seems that Christians took this as a sign that they would be going there too.

But maybe in a sense they were right. They just didn't understand what heaven meant. The heavens are simply the space outside of our atmosphere. Enoch rode a fiery chariot to the heavens. Sounds kinda like something else to me...

So then, if heaven is the term used to describe "space", then what were Christians promised? Seems like a new planet, or maybe this planet will be drastically altered. Maybe it's a sort of "mother ship". Here's what the prophet John has to say on the matter.

Revelations 21:21 Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the old heaven and the old earth had disappeared. And the sea was also gone. 2 And I saw the holy city, the new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven like a bride beautifully dressed for her husband.

Hell

Well then, if thats where the good go, what about the bad? Some believe hell is the answer. I don't think so.

Did you know that every "hell", "hades", and "the grave" written in the English OT were originally either "Sheol", or "Gehenna"? Two very different meanings all merged into the modern day "hell".

Gehenna was an actual place on earth in fact. It was named Hinnom Valley. It was sort of like modern day New Jersey. (Jk guys) It was a place were children were sacrificed to the false gods and and burnt offerings were a commonplace. Eternal fire and maggots some have called it.

By the way it is used in the OT, it seems to be used as a metaphor by the conflicting descriptions given throughout.

Sheol on the other hand is where all dead go according to Jewish tradition. Good and Bad alike(in a relative manner of speaking). For sin is what causes death(besides car crashes and stuff along that nature) and if you are free of sin, you will never die of old age.

Enoch is a good testament to this. He never sinned, and never died. He instead left the earth before the flood to live among and judge the children of heaven.

But Sheol is nothing like an eternal hell. In fact, it can be looked at as being similar to a lot of New Age ideas. A place where the "shadows" reside.

Creation

I'm a believer of evolution and the BB theories myself. Its only through ignorance that many Christians won't accept scientific theories. But I'll never understand how so many atheists and theists alike would rather remain ignorant instead of looking for answers.

Many take it that Adam was the first man. But what evidence do we have of this? Is it possible he was simply the first man to walk in gods ways? It would explain why he lived so long. He and his descendants who would have been passed down Adams knowledge.

Did God not say to Jesus in genesis, "Let us make them like us."? Well, God did make Adam and Eve. But maybe he simply made them "like us".

Is it possible that this was simply the moment God set his long plan for us into motion? To send this knowledge down the generations? It is clear in the Book of Jasher, that during Adam and Eves time the world was already populated by kingdoms of men. Enoch taught all these kings the ways of God up until the flood.

Well, that's all I have for now.
 
The fact is that all of Jesus' words are just hearsay. We dont know exactly what Jesus really said unless you believe the hearsay of what Jesus allegedly said DECADES after he died.

Why should Jesus' words be considered "the Word of God", when Jesus' words were not recorded until decades after he died?

~PEACE~
 
The fact is that all of Jesus' words are just hearsay. We dont know exactly what Jesus really said unless you believe the hearsay of what Jesus allegedly said DECADES after he died.

Why should Jesus' words be considered "the Word of God", when Jesus' words were not recorded until decades after he died?

~PEACE~

The men that recorded Jesus' teachings and miracles seperately all managed to get the same basic story. It definately lends to the credibility of each other.

Also there are other figures outside of the that can lend credibility to Jesus. Not his words, but his life.

Here's an article for the evidence of Jesus outside of biblical literature.
http://www.probe.org/site/c.fdKEIMN...dence_for_Jesus_from_NonChristian_Sources.htm
 
The men that recorded Jesus' teachings and miracles seperately all managed to get the same basic story. It definately lends to the credibility of each other.

Also there are other figures outside of the that can lend credibility to Jesus. Not his words, but his life.

Here's an article for the evidence of Jesus outside of biblical literature.
http://www.probe.org/site/c.fdKEIMN...dence_for_Jesus_from_NonChristian_Sources.htm

I truly dont believe that anyone, even the smartest of people with the best of memory, could remember EVERYTHING that I have said online, verbatim. Even the smartest of people with the best memory probably would not be able to quote Me verbatim, out of the thousands of posts that I have made (I used to blog on RIU with other usernames too).

I bet that even the smartest people with the best of memory wouldnt even be able to quote My youtube videos, verbatim, unless they watched My videos of Myself, many times. And then add decades of them not being able to see or hear from Me.

Im sure that the gospel writers copied eachother, at least it seems that way to Me. It would be a different story if a bunch of people were recording the events as they were happening; but we are talking about decades after the fact, then being recorded.

I would bet that no one can even state all of My prophecies for the future, and the Bible stories that (I believe) I have fulfilled, verbatim; never mind My every Word that I have uttered online. And I have been claiming to be Christ only about 6 years, and I have posted these thing many times.

I would like to see someone prove Me wrong, though.

~PEACE~
 
I truly dont believe that anyone, even the smartest of people with the best of memory, could remember EVERYTHING that I have said online, verbatim. Even the smartest of people with the best memory probably would not be able to quote Me verbatim, out of the thousands of posts that I have made (I used to blog on RIU with other usernames too).

I bet that even the smartest people with the best of memory wouldnt even be able to quote My youtube videos, verbatim, unless they watched My videos of Myself, many times. And then add decades of them not being able to see or hear from Me.

Im sure that the gospel writers copied eachother, at least it seems that way to Me. It would be a different story if a bunch of people were recording the events as they were happening; but we are talking about decades after the fact, then being recorded.

I would bet that no one can even state all of My prophecies for the future, and the Bible stories that (I believe) I have fulfilled, verbatim; never mind My every Word that I have uttered online. And I have been claiming to be Christ only about 6 years, and I have posted these thing many times.

I would like to see someone prove Me wrong, though.

~PEACE~

To be fair, what you've said may have gathered some listeners. You may have even changed a persons way of living or brought them to an epiphany. But Jesus taught thousands and people followed him and listened to every word he spoke. People believed in him so much they gave their lives for his words. They starved themselves just for the chance he would say one more word to them.

A few decades could not erase what was so important to these people. Their stories were probably written down at the time too. However, with the Romans burning down the homes and killing much of the Jewish people, such evidence could very easily be lost.

He's an article over what we know about the gospel writers today.
https://www.lds.org/new-era/2007/01/who-are-matthew-mark-luke-and-john?lang=eng
 
Satan

What exactly is Satan in the Bible? If we look up Sataan in Hebrew we will find it means "adversary", or "obstruction".

It's an interesting fact that many cases Satan is actually written ha-satan, or "the adversary". Seems more like a description than a name.

In the Book of Job this becomes much more evident as the entity called ha-satan is clearly following Gods will. Unlike the Satan most think are trying to foil Gods plan.

A great article if anyone is interested in reading further into this subject and the story of Job. http://mythsofchristianity.com/god-and-the-devil/satan-and-job/
 
Intro

What does one mans ideas on religion have to do with the religion itself? You will find many different views and many of them will contradict each other and themselves.

Do you understand why this is? It's because religion isn't a science. It's our history and people are deciphering it in any way they can.


There is evidence of many biblical events having actually occurred. In fact, a lot of what we teach about ancient history today comes from biblical scripture. Many think the tales have been over exaggerated and that is understandable.

A lot of issues with today's standard Christianity beliefs stem from too many ignorant people interpreting and spreading the knowledge in the bible. They pick and choose. Read only one line from a paragraph. Believe in things that weren't meant to be believed in.

But there is legitimacy to biblical scripture. The prophets and Jesus' writings should be understood as the actual words of God. All else is from mans interpretation.

2 Peter 1:20Above all, you must realize that no prophecy in Scripture ever came from the prophet’s own understanding,h21or from human initiative. No, those prophets were moved by the Holy Spirit, and they spoke from God.

Even Moses' books would be his interpretation according to the Jewish belief that Moses wrote his books himself. Jews worship him as a God among men almost. But they forget even he was unworthy to enter the promised land.
http://www.gotquestions.org/Moses-promised-land.html

All that being said, this is just my understanding of things. Please post constructive criticism if you feel I am in the wrong. I don't claim to know all the answer, or even a tenth of them.

Heaven

Most churches will tell you that if you are good you go to heaven and if you are bad you go to hell. Or something along those lines anyway.

But where is that said by the prophets or Jesus? This has been mans interpretation too. In fact, the righteous are not going to heaven at all.

Heaven is where Enoch ascended to. To live among and judge the chrildren of heaven. The children of heaven sounds like something you won't hear about in the Bible. But the Dead Sea Scrolls seem to agree that the 3 books of Enoch hold some truth after all. Besides being referenced by Jude the half brother of Jesus.

Jesus also ascended to heaven after his resurrection. And it seems that Christians took this as a sign that they would be going there too.

But maybe in a sense they were right. They just didn't understand what heaven meant. The heavens are simply the space outside of our atmosphere. Enoch rode a fiery chariot to the heavens. Sounds kinda like something else to me...

So then, if heaven is the term used to describe "space", then what were Christians promised? Seems like a new planet, or maybe this planet will be drastically altered. Maybe it's a sort of "mother ship". Here's what the prophet John has to say on the matter.

Revelations 21:21 Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the old heaven and the old earth had disappeared. And the sea was also gone. 2 And I saw the holy city, the new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven like a bride beautifully dressed for her husband.

Hell

Well then, if thats where the good go, what about the bad? Some believe hell is the answer. I don't think so.

Did you know that every "hell", "hades", and "the grave" written in the English OT were originally either "Sheol", or "Gehenna"? Two very different meanings all merged into the modern day "hell".

Gehenna was an actual place on earth in fact. It was named Hinnom Valley. It was sort of like modern day New Jersey. (Jk guys) It was a place were children were sacrificed to the false gods and and burnt offerings were a commonplace. Eternal fire and maggots some have called it.

By the way it is used in the OT, it seems to be used as a metaphor by the conflicting descriptions given throughout.

Sheol on the other hand is where all dead go according to Jewish tradition. Good and Bad alike(in a relative manner of speaking). For sin is what causes death(besides car crashes and stuff along that nature) and if you are free of sin, you will never die of old age.

Enoch is a good testament to this. He never sinned, and never died. He instead left the earth before the flood to live among and judge the children of heaven.

But Sheol is nothing like an eternal hell. In fact, it can be looked at as being similar to a lot of New Age ideas. A place where the "shadows" reside.

Creation

I'm a believer of evolution and the BB theories myself. Its only through ignorance that many Christians won't accept scientific theories. But I'll never understand how so many atheists and theists alike would rather remain ignorant instead of looking for answers.

Many take it that Adam was the first man. But what evidence do we have of this? Is it possible he was simply the first man to walk in gods ways? It would explain why he lived so long. He and his descendants who would have been passed down Adams knowledge.

Did God not say to Jesus in genesis, "Let us make them like us."? Well, God did make Adam and Eve. But maybe he simply made them "like us".

Is it possible that this was simply the moment God set his long plan for us into motion? To send this knowledge down the generations? It is clear in the Book of Jasher, that during Adam and Eves time the world was already populated by kingdoms of men. Enoch taught all these kings the ways of God up until the flood.

Well, that's all I have for now.
well I personably believe religion started after the scattering of babel...and yes I did use the word god in those days...
 
Back
Top