another wonderful Charleston South carolina fficer

S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
whitebb2727 said:
Have you read this thread? I understand cops have a job to do. I'm talking about if I walk down the side walk, hit a road block, something of that nature a cop has no right to walk up and ask for id or bother you.
You say he died for being breaking the law. You are braking the law. Don't give me "its legal in my state." You are breaking a federal law and you know it. The feds could bust your door down if they wanted to. We all break laws. We all do what we think is right.

That cop shot that man in the back. He then picked the taser up and moved it. He looked at the guy and knew he fucked up and moved that taser to cover his ass.

You make no sense. If a person is convicted by a jury of their peers and sentenced to death, oh that's wrong. Let a cop be the judge, jury, and executioner that's OK.

A cop is a public SERVANT. Why do you think a cop has that kind of control?

You need to wake up and pay attention to what's going on. You will look one day and be like wtf happened.

I will act according when interacting with police but I will say no when they ask or do something that infringes on my rights.

Once again, shooting someone in the back is cowardly.

Its called trigger control. The military does live fire exercises, they train and train some more. They can identify threat or not in a flash.

Cops should go through more training to stress them and teach them to control adrenaline and make better decisions.

I'm not going to argue this any more. A man had a warrant for child support. He is now dead and the kids suffer.

Shooting someone in the back is cowardly. Remind me not to piss you off since you think shooting a man in the back is OK.
Click to expand...
have you?

trigger control?:lol:

there's a big difference between shooting at the range 'to qualify' and live pursuit.

my ex emptied his gun for the guy he shot in the back.
 
whitebb2727

whitebb2727

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
have you?

trigger control?:lol:

there's a big difference between shooting at the range 'to qualify' and live pursuit.

my ex emptied his gun for the guy he shot in the back.
Click to expand...
That's my point. Cops need better training. Going to the range will not prepare you for when something happens. Just because someone runs or disobeys a cop and his adrenaline rises is no excuse to shoot.

If your ex shot someone in the back and emptied his clip he is a coward to.

Emptied a whole clip. That is fear, a coward. With real training you could control yourself and shoot once or twice to end a threat.

Shooting someone in the back is cowardly. Sorry but that's the truth. You can justify it any way you want. Shooting someone in the back is cowardly. Emptying a whole magazine is fear and loss of control.
 
Last edited:
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
coloradolivin said:
how is running from a car, using someone else's tazer to hurt someone "flexing your rights"? this is what really grinds my gears, people choose the worst examples as their poster boy and then when the evidence falls and reveals the maniac for what it is people just become further divided and conquered.

we need more cliven bundy incidents, now that was fuckin flexing your rights correctly 8-)View attachment 3392925
Click to expand...
i honestly hope you and your klan buddies get killed when your burning cross falls over and crushes you.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
whitebb2727 said:
That's my point. Cops need better training. Going to the range will nor prepare you for when something happens. Just because someone runs or disobeys a cop and his adrenaline rises is no excuse to shoot.

If your ex shot someone in the back and emptied his clip he is a coward to.

Emptied a whole clip. That is fear, a coward. With real training you could control yourself and shoot once or twice to end a threat.

Shooting someone in the back is cowardly. Sorry but that's the truth. You can justify it any way you want. Shooting someone in the back is cowardly. Emptying a whole magazine is fear and loss of control.
Click to expand...
i'd like to see you try it.

my ex already had done his 20 and pulling his 2nd pension when he had to use his gun for the first time in the line duty.

i'm gonna say he was pretty fucking well trained.
 
whitebb2727

whitebb2727

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
i'd like to see you try it.

my ex already had done his 20 and pulling his 2nd pension when he had to use his gun for the first time in the line duty.

i'm gonna say he was pretty fucking well trained.
Click to expand...
Like I said justify how you want. If you empty your gun you loss control from fear.

There would only be one or two reasons that I would shoot someone in the back.

Say someone grabbed or attacked one of my kids or wife I would drop you.

Someone had a weapon and was fixing to attack someone I would drop them.

That's it. To save a life, yes shoot. Otherwise there is no reason and you are a coward.

Your trying to justify a man being gunned down over child support. These guys knew each other. Since that cop was the type to shoot someone in the back and then move evidence to save himself he may have provoked this incident. What if that cop started to reach for his gun first?

I have told the story here before. I had a incident where a cop pulled me over and I was pulled out of the car and he threatened to beat me up. He kept bumping his chest into me. I stayed calm because I knew if I moved wrong he would have shot me. He was later fired for being on drugs and stealing.

That cop was wrong and a coward.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
whitebb2727 said:
Like I said justify how you want. If you empty your gun you loss control from fear.

There would only be one or two reasons that I would shoot someone in the back.

Say someone grabbed or attacked one of my kids or wife I would drop you.

Someone had a weapon and was fixing to attack someone I would drop them.

That's it. To save a life, yes shoot. Otherwise there is no reason and you are a coward.

Your trying to justify a man being gunned down over child support. These guys knew each other. Since that cop was the type to shoot someone in the back and then move evidence to save himself he may have provoked this incident. What if that cop started to reach for his gun first?

I have told the story here before. I had a incident where a cop pulled me over and I was pulled out of the car and he threatened to beat me up. He kept bumping his chest into me. I stayed calm because I knew if I moved wrong he would have shot me. He was later fired for being on drugs and stealing.

That cop was wrong and a coward.
Click to expand...
i'm sorry..we're just gonna have to agree to disagree on this.
 
coloradolivin

coloradolivin

Well-Known Member
no I am a market supremacist. If white people are coincidentally the best or worst in a given market no skin off my back
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
coloradolivin said:
no I am a market supremacist. If white people are coincidentally the best or worst in a given market no skin off my back
Click to expand...
Good for you man, a rare breed around here indeed. You are openly racist and are happy to admit it. You're a total scumbag, but I gotta respect the fact you are openly racist and don't care what others think.

You see, the rest of your Klansmen in this forum are racist bigots like yourself, but are afraid to admit it openly. So they try to play rhetorical word games to dance around the issue. You... nope you, you are openly racist and proud.
 
coloradolivin

coloradolivin

Well-Known Member
how did he plant evidence? wouldn't he need to put fingerprints on the tazer? I don't see him doing that. Is it possible he was securing the area
see4 said:
Good for you man, a rare breed around here indeed. You are openly racist and are happy to admit it. You're a total scumbag, but I gotta respect the fact you are openly racist and don't care what others think.

You see, the rest of your Klansmen in this forum are racist bigots like yourself, but are afraid to admit it openly. So they try to play rhetorical word games to dance around the issue. You... nope you, you are openly racist and proud.
Click to expand...
what a strange post. how am I openly racist?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
coloradolivin said:
how did he plant evidence? wouldn't he need to put fingerprints on the tazer? I don't see him doing that. Is it possible he was securing the area

what a strange post. how am I openly racist?
Click to expand...
i think it might have been that cartoon you posted from a white power tumblr website.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top