Humanrob
Well-Known Member
That sounds like a possible and likely scenario, since in many ways the rec laws overlap and make obsolete the med laws. Other than six plants vs. four plants, I'm not sure what the med card benefit would be (other than possibly cheaper prices, if one is taxed and the other isn't). It would be interesting when the rec laws are nailed down, to see the two side by side. I wonder what the most (in weight) you can have on you will be with the rec laws, how freely people will be able to trade seeds and clones, and if there are limits to how much you can have at one time in your home?I suspect medical licenses and grows will in time go away and rely on the rec rules for personal growing, it kinda makes sense. They want to get a handle on the current "medical" grows that are producing 25 lbs. + per year with some in the 100's of pounds and a few in the 1000's of pounds. They cannot inspect these grows without a warrant and have no current guidelines for tracking sales to dispensaries, or surplus, that goes to black market. I'm sure they want to get a handle on this. I'm betting that medical goes away to be replaced by recreational in a general view. But they are not going to screw the dispensaries, they will roll them over to recreational sales and phase out medical. In the new law they want to be able to track from seed/plant to point of sale, so this will involve regular inspections etc. if you are a licensed grower, processor, etc.
I also heard that lawmakers are thinking of letting dispensaries start selling recreational July 1. If they do that with no prior provisions for extra bud requirements we could see prices soar, and this would also push current medical grows beyond legal limits to support the additional volume. We might get back to 4k or higher for a pound. This would drive the medical patients crazy. Oh well, all fun speculation.
Speaking of, I used to have a link to a website that published the most current version of the law as its being debated, but I can't find it. Anyone have that?
People want to compare its legal status to our culture's dominant legal recreational drug - alcohol - but the basis for comparison seems to drift depending on the conversation. I wonder how the shift in the post-prohibition years took place. In that case, there had previously been an industry in place and all it needed to do was retool, in this case, it is largely a cottage industry that is going to go commercial (with a handful of exceptions).