MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
Now, here we have a fine example of a sock puppet.
Arizonas Trayvon Martin? Another Stand Your Ground Killing
- Thread starter nontheist
- Start date
Now, here we have a fine example of a sock puppet.
Walter9999
Well-Known Member
"it's better to be thought a fool and remain silent, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt"
You obviously don't know the meaning of a sock puppet.
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
Oh, I do. And you're it.
Sock Puppet:
The term sock puppet refers to multiple pseudonyms in use by the same person on a particular message board or forum.
Walter9999
Well-Known Member
So your definition of a sock puppet in reference to me is anyone who recently signs up asking about LED lighting and stumbles across a thread on your website about another subject and vehemently disagrees with your position and they're a sock puppet? Way to go Matlock. You're gonna lose a lot of cases with those deductive skills. Bring it!
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
No, I'm simply applying the EXACT same standards that UB and the gang use for instantaneous identification of sock puppets. Hits the politics section immediately after joining and then parrots the same shit his doppelgänger is saying. Like say, in his first ten or so posts. The couple of posts in the grow sections is standard sock puppet actions, trying to establish credibility and failing. Then there's the ease that they seem to feel, despite being new, in ranting on or insulting longstanding members.
You look exactly like EVERY sock puppet that's been called out by the libs. Suck it.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
No doubt about it
Sock Puppets suck
But so do people who just parrot misinformation fed to them from the right wing echo chamber without checking the validity of the statements
Like
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
We already handled that, you lost...or at best tied with the scandal of the IIPC roles.
And to continue with this theme, you've been parroting misinformation for years, you just didn't know it. You know it now, after all the recent exposès of exaggerated predictions and intentional, false results. You just dismiss it and keep on trucking. It was for the good of the "cause" so you can't really blame them, they were noble in their hearts. Fuck that. These are the organizations supplying the data and models that fill websites like the one ginja likes to C&P from.
When they say "uh, yeah, we got it wrong...we were waaaay off" it matters. When they get caught fabricating data that all the loons use to strong-arm legislation, it matters. "It turns out we were off by 30 to 50 years, BUT NOW WE KNOW." Translation: we couldn't get our 15-20 year predictions even close to reality, but trust our 40 year prediction of calamity and boiling oceans.
Here, buy some carbon credits, it'll make it all better now. Will that be cash, check or garnishment?
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
You dont get paid to parrot talking points of the energy corporations
That makes you a fool
Still stand with the the Oregon Institutes fabricated numbers?
Oh just for laughs
Here is a picture of your esteemed institutes hedquarters and faculty
Right from their web site
Walter9999
Well-Known Member
ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
The website I quoted is a response to the false claims made by deniers. If they are wrong point out where they're wrong. Waving your hands about crying conspiracy does not make it so
I notice you don't source anything you have to say
Walter9999
Well-Known Member
Nope, sorry Mr Wizard I meant http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prejudice
As in Pre judging someone. And now I'm done with you keyboard commando Know it all M F er
PREJUDICED and prejudice mean the same thing walter,
Walter9999
Well-Known Member
Shouldn't you be sharing this with The dillweed I was responding to? You're saying the same thing I did. Go back and read her response to me
Similar threads
