Attention growers!!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
P

pokesalotasmot

Well-Known Member
No luda YOU are wrong. What you did was to inform a noob that his plants would eventually "flower" under 18/6 lighting. Just because that might be true for 3 % of the known marijuana strains, that doesn't give you the right to twist it around and apply it to all marijuana, which is what you were suggesting. And when monkz called you out on it, you insulted him. YOU where the instigator.

What you did was take a VERY unique situation, and applied it to a noobs bagseed grow. You can't do that. What monkz did was point out the fact that 97 out of 100 mj grows are only going to flower under 12/12 light. Thats all the noob needed to know, he didn't need to know some tidbit of information that'll probly never apply to him anyways. :roll:

I noticed you do help noobs a lot, and kudos to you for that, but I also noticed you tend to give the noobs WAY more information than they need to know, and I think sometimes that probably confuses them. Sometimes all they need is a straight simple answer, but you can't do that because all you do is copy and paste everything.

Anyways, I'm off to bed, I'll have no more part of this. G nite all, happy tokin.
 
LUDACRIS

LUDACRIS

New Member
pokesalotasmot said:
No luda YOU are wrong. What you did was to inform a noob that his plants would eventually "flower" under 18/6 lighting. Just because that might be true for 3 % of the known marijuana strains, that doesn't give you the right to twist it around and apply it to all marijuana, which is what you were suggesting. And when monkz called you out on it, you insulted him. YOU where the instigator.

What you did was take a VERY unique situation, and applied it to a noobs bagseed grow. You can't do that. What monkz did was point out the fact that 97 out of 100 mj grows are only going to flower under 12/12 light. Thats all the noob needed to know, he didn't need to know some tidbit of information that'll probly never apply to him anyways. :roll:

I noticed you do help noobs a lot, and kudos to you for that, but I also noticed you tend to give the noobs WAY more information than they need to know, and I think sometimes that probably confuses them. Sometimes all they need is a straight simple answer, but you can't do that because all you do is copy and paste everything.

Anyways, I'm off to bed, I'll have no more part of this. G nite all, happy tokin.
Click to expand...
where did i specify strains ???????.
seems like you are the twister who cant read the facts.

LUDA.
 
LUDACRIS

LUDACRIS

New Member
pokesalotasmot said:
No luda YOU are wrong. What you did was to inform a noob that his plants would eventually "flower" under 18/6 lighting. Just because that might be true for 3 % of the known marijuana strains, that doesn't give you the right to twist it around and apply it to all marijuana, which is what you were suggesting. And when monkz called you out on it, you insulted him. YOU where the instigator.

What you did was take a VERY unique situation, and applied it to a noobs bagseed grow. You can't do that. What monkz did was point out the fact that 97 out of 100 mj grows are only going to flower under 12/12 light. Thats all the noob needed to know, he didn't need to know some tidbit of information that'll probly never apply to him anyways. :roll:

I noticed you do help noobs a lot, and kudos to you for that, but I also noticed you tend to give the noobs WAY more information than they need to know, and I think sometimes that probably confuses them. Sometimes all they need is a straight simple answer, but you can't do that because all you do is copy and paste everything.

Anyways, I'm off to bed, I'll have no more part of this. G nite all, happy tokin.
Click to expand...

no the instigator is the O.P.
anyway believe what you want.
and why would i sit and type for hours when i have maybe 10000 documents strored on my p.c.
i have done my time at school and transferred all my knowledge and experience on to my documents so why should i not copy and paste :lol:.
maybe because i seem to be answering the same silly questions everyday.

LUDA.
 
monkz

monkz

Well-Known Member
pokesalotasmot said:
No luda YOU are wrong. What you did was to inform a noob that his plants would eventually "flower" under 18/6 lighting. Just because that might be true for 3 % of the known marijuana strains, that doesn't give you the right to twist it around and apply it to all marijuana, which is what you were suggesting. And when monkz called you out on it, you insulted him. YOU where the instigator.

What you did was take a VERY unique situation, and applied it to a noobs bagseed grow. You can't do that. What monkz did was point out the fact that 97 out of 100 mj grows are only going to flower under 12/12 light. Thats all the noob needed to know, he didn't need to know some tidbit of information that'll probly never apply to him anyways. :roll:

I noticed you do help noobs a lot, and kudos to you for that, but I also noticed you tend to give the noobs WAY more information than they need to know, and I think sometimes that probably confuses them. Sometimes all they need is a straight simple answer, but you can't do that because all you do is copy and paste everything.

Anyways, I'm off to bed, I'll have no more part of this. G nite all, happy tokin.
Click to expand...
Thanx dude, but this guy is a noob himself who's probably never grown anything other than hair. So i think its time to leave this alone.

Nite nite.
 
whiterhyno420

whiterhyno420

Well-Known Member
monkz said:
Hi peeps Monkz here,

just thought Id share something with everyone. On another thread earlier today somebody asked if an 18/6 light cycle would induce flowering... the obvious answer was given: no! (excluding auto-flowering strains).
Then a member of this very site kept going on and on about how 18/6 does induce flowering. I will not mention his name because I only want to help new growers and make sure that mis-information isn't spread to the point where newbies believe it.
He was very adament that the plant showing its pre-flowers and actually flowering were the same thing and I obviously told him otherwise. If what he says were true, which is ridiculous to even say or think, then how could a mother plant be kept on a vegetative light cycle for months, even years without having it flower.
I explained to him time and time again that a veg cycle will only allow the plant to show its pre-flowers and that it would not actually 'flower' or bud out' but he didnt listen and continued to express his ignorant opinion.

I just dont understand how someone can be so certain about such an un-yielding (lol excuse the pun) opinion, on a subject that I thought was common knowledge.

If plants didnt need a flowering cycle do you think nature would bother with having autumn and winter?

LOL this guy just wowed me is all I can say.

So if you didnt know... NO 18/6 doesnt induce flowering and for the majority of people who know this common fact please please please for the love of god speak out so that new growers dont make the silly mistake of keeping their plants on 18/6 forever and ever waiting for it to magically flower lol

Peace,
Monkz.
Click to expand...
lol i hate wen a newb dont kno any thing and then act like they do and wen 5,6,or 7 of us is saying other wise they still argue i just ignore them and say ok then tell the o.p dont listen lol they make me laugh
 
LUDACRIS

LUDACRIS

New Member
whiterhyno420 said:
lol i hate wen a newb dont kno any thing and then act like they do and wen 5,6,or 7 of us is saying other wise they still argue i just ignore them and say ok then tell the o.p dont listen lol they make me laugh
Click to expand...
fancy meeting you here "RHYNO"
(hope you are all good).

LUDA.
;-)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top