massah
Well-Known Member
see whats kinda fucked up...is that a c-section doesn't damage the cervix...it doesn't damage the vagina...it puts a slit in the uterus...that's it...the whole "you are highly unlikely to be able to have a vaginal birth after a c-section" is crap...a vaginal birth is a vaginal birth is a vaginal birth...the only 'problem" after a c-section is the VERY low risk of having the original uterine scar tearing...6 out of 10 vaginal after c-section births go just fine, the other 4 have birthing issues to begin with that would make them prone to needing a c-section anyway, or overzealous doctors ![Wink ;) ;)](/styles/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
It's amazing when you look at hospitals c-section rates...you see some with very low rates(under 10%)...then you see others with 20-25%...and you start to wonder why...then you look at what makes up the hospital staffing at those hospitals. Ones with lower c-section rates are normally attributed to working with a group of midwives, vs hospitals with high rates that have nothing but doctors and a meat market mentality towards their patients![Wink ;) ;)](/styles/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Wink ;) ;)](/styles/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
It's amazing when you look at hospitals c-section rates...you see some with very low rates(under 10%)...then you see others with 20-25%...and you start to wonder why...then you look at what makes up the hospital staffing at those hospitals. Ones with lower c-section rates are normally attributed to working with a group of midwives, vs hospitals with high rates that have nothing but doctors and a meat market mentality towards their patients
![Wink ;) ;)](/styles/smilies/icon_wink.gif)