georgi345
Active Member
friends, stoners, countryfolk! lend me your ears--
i'm interested in experimenting with a quasi-'biodynamic' lighting schedule in addition to an all-organic soil grow and am wondering if anyone has any opinions as to its desirability/efficacy?
in biodynamic botany (one of anthroposophy's many weird little spin-offs), lunar phases play a key role in coordinating plant growth and development. i'm intrigued by this and, being of a tinkering disposition, am considering re-working my stealth-closet lighting from being the normal binary dark/light with hourly variances scheme, to one in which both light spectrum and intensity are redistributed in a four-fold 'lunar schedule' that would (at 12light/12dark flowering) go instead 6(t)light/6(t)dark/6(t)light/6(t)dark. the initial light period would be the 'solar' full spectrum [which in my situation for 2-3 flowering plants at a time is 1 3rd gen ufo led, 2 24w t-5ho (with either veg(6500k) or flower(3000k) spectrum bulbs), 2 32w cfls (150w equivalent), 1 10uvb lamp (around cycle noon, flowering only), and 1 50w ir ('twilight' supplement, max 2hrs total)]. the second 'lunar' light period would then only be partial spectrum, eliminating the ufo, the uvb, and the ir. with the 'lunar' period, the cfls would be used only during actual lunar quarter phases around the calendar full moon (solely for time-keeping purposes and without the presumption of any sort of strange 'sublunar' vibes). the (t) above is the time variable for variance around the plants life cycle/nutrient schedule (ie 18light/6dark during veg would give 9light(solar)/ 3dark(with 1hr ir supplemental at phase beginning)/9light(lunar, cfl schedule depending on phase)/3dark(with 1ht ir supplemental at end).
so, does this all sound like lunacy? a massive waste of time? something worth experimenting with?
your thoughts please!
-g
i'm interested in experimenting with a quasi-'biodynamic' lighting schedule in addition to an all-organic soil grow and am wondering if anyone has any opinions as to its desirability/efficacy?
in biodynamic botany (one of anthroposophy's many weird little spin-offs), lunar phases play a key role in coordinating plant growth and development. i'm intrigued by this and, being of a tinkering disposition, am considering re-working my stealth-closet lighting from being the normal binary dark/light with hourly variances scheme, to one in which both light spectrum and intensity are redistributed in a four-fold 'lunar schedule' that would (at 12light/12dark flowering) go instead 6(t)light/6(t)dark/6(t)light/6(t)dark. the initial light period would be the 'solar' full spectrum [which in my situation for 2-3 flowering plants at a time is 1 3rd gen ufo led, 2 24w t-5ho (with either veg(6500k) or flower(3000k) spectrum bulbs), 2 32w cfls (150w equivalent), 1 10uvb lamp (around cycle noon, flowering only), and 1 50w ir ('twilight' supplement, max 2hrs total)]. the second 'lunar' light period would then only be partial spectrum, eliminating the ufo, the uvb, and the ir. with the 'lunar' period, the cfls would be used only during actual lunar quarter phases around the calendar full moon (solely for time-keeping purposes and without the presumption of any sort of strange 'sublunar' vibes). the (t) above is the time variable for variance around the plants life cycle/nutrient schedule (ie 18light/6dark during veg would give 9light(solar)/ 3dark(with 1hr ir supplemental at phase beginning)/9light(lunar, cfl schedule depending on phase)/3dark(with 1ht ir supplemental at end).
so, does this all sound like lunacy? a massive waste of time? something worth experimenting with?
your thoughts please!
-g