Well as we cant see the top lasses face, or chest , she could have a right rotten puss(face). So the top picture is false advertising, hence illegal.
Sorry, on a serious note i think it is as the top picture has hands or a hand down the pants, (when i say pants i mean knickers/underwear, as im in d uk,)
so that top pic is suggesting numerous things, i guess that would be why.
Could be wrong though. Take it easy.
do you find either display of clothing to be offensive?
what kind of clothing offends you (if any) and would you go so far as to ban it, if any did?
these questions should apply to anyone wishing to get involved in this installment of buck's bogart.
i come in peace.
I watched 2 hours of girls taking shits it took me two hours to find the hottest girl dropping the fattest log to masterbate to!! I find those pics quite boring. ....to say the least.
This is illegal in Dublin, Georgia
![]()
but this is not
![]()
can anyone tell me why?
I watched 2 hours of girls taking shits it took me two hours to find the hottest girl dropping the fattest log to masterbate to!! I find those pics quite boring. ....to say the least.
time for some more hints:
illegal.
![]()
illegal.
![]()
hot girls don't "drop fat logs"![]()
I've heard of legislation that forbids the public exposure of ones undergarments. This seems to be a common tie within your displayed pictures.
The legal contains something similar, that does not expose the undergarment, the illegal has them exposed.
Amirite?
you got it.
dublin georgia recently put a law on the books that forbids the sagging of pants. can not wear them more than 3'' below your hips.
clearly a racially targeted law, amirite? or am i just being oversensitive here?