morgentaler
Well-Known Member
Maybe I said I had a ball in my pocket because I wanted you to put your hand there.
Don't you feel dirty now?
Don't you feel dirty now?
Okay, to answer the original question.
Theists don't understand 'burden of proof' because indoctrination instills them with the idea that no proof but the bible is needed, and looking for other proof is questioning God, which is a huge no-no.
In the end, they all abandon the Bible and lock arms..... one problem tho..... it doesn't help the recruiting rates for the myth.
It shows ur position cannot stand on its own merits....
Burden of proof failure.
Maybe I said I had a ball in my pocket because I wanted you to put your hand there.
Don't you feel dirty now?
So, you get to set a standard (and give it a title) I had no say in making, then expect me to fulfill those expectations in order to fulfill it's requirements? I'm seeing more clearly how you try manipulate both sides of the argument. When people don't take the bait with your "questions", you conclude lack of conviction...... and therefore lack of Existence.
It's a cowards argument. Your little understanding of something spiritual could be expanded by an honest question. Don't be shy. It'll feel cleansing. Promise.
A believer may get sucked into trying to prove anything to you..... probably more out of enjoyment of the subject...... or pity. We mean well, anyway. Who knows? You may just see the light.
Well said pal. It seems when someone disputes the beliefs of a religion they get labeled an Atheist, there are not many true atheists out there who are the ones claiming there is no god.Dude... how hard is it really? What don't you get about this concept that you are the one making the claim, so it is you who has to prove it. If I made a claim, I'd have to prove it too. It works exactly the same way. Thing is.. I'm not sitting here saying "God doesn't exist", what I'm saying is "I don't know if God exists", that is not at all a claim, it's a statement, it's an opinion. You're saying "God does exist", to that I say "prove it" - till you do, CJ's right, burder of proof fail.
So, you get to set a standard (and give it a title) I had no say in making, then expect me to fulfill those expectations in order to fulfill it's requirements? I'm seeing more clearly how you try manipulate both sides of the argument. When people don't take the bait with your "questions", you conclude lack of conviction...... and therefore lack of Existence.
It's a cowards argument. Your little understanding of something spiritual could be expanded by an honest question. Don't be shy. It'll feel cleansing. Promise.
A believer may get sucked into trying to prove anything to you..... probably more out of enjoyment of the subject...... or pity. We mean well, anyway. Who knows? You may just see the light.
What I feel as an agnostic is that I don't know if there is a god or not but I believe all religions are falsehoods created as a means to control man.
I'm one of the true atheists. But not an adeist. There may be a creative force (or intelligence) beyond what physics and cosmology currently understands, but until there is evidence for it I'll remain agnostic in that regard.
I'm a true atheist because the gods of men are petty, shallow things, created from archaic beliefs, and each group of worshippers dismisses the validity of the other groups god. The burden of proof lies with religions to prove their gods exist, and if they can't convince each other they will certainly never convince me.
Okay, to answer the original question.
Theists don't understand 'burden of proof' because indoctrination instills them with the idea that no proof but the bible is needed, and looking for other proof is questioning God, which is a huge no-no.
You mean myth..... no G*D has been proven to exist.
How can you possibly know that?
How can you possibly know that?
Because he is NOt a Slave to Science.., but Science a Slave to Him..., Is this statement not True? Anybody
![]()
You know of g*d because you just do ... very convincing.