Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
No, man, it's not a slippery slope. That is a talking point that doesn't make any sense when analyzed. A brother and sister, lets use that example. Why would it be wrong if they got married? Because we know that if they were to have kids, there is a good chance that those kids would end up with genetic issues. That alone justifies putting it in a separate category. Same with animals, children, and people unfit to give consent.Its the whole premise of equal rights. If gays can marry, why cant a brother marry his sister, they are consenting right? Its a slippery slope. It only goes downhill.
But polygamy, what is inherently wrong with that if it's among consenting adults? Why should religious people have the right to define what constitutes a marriage under United States law? Why should religious values be injected into American law at all? Is that not discriminatory against those of us that are not religious or follow a different religion with different religious values?