hillbill

Well-Known Member
Vegged quite a bit with blue and blue with some white when I first started with LEDs 8 years ago when I ran mostly Peak gear and ratios were always just over 50% female which was the same with cfls and hps. The plants though had almost no node spacing under blue light. I tried to make that blue work even adding a little white but white always seemed best regardless of source.

My question would be of what value are fem seeds if 90% plus females by using blue light?
 

SSGrower

Well-Known Member
Beyond light, I think temp and humidity plays a more prevalent role. I remember reading something about afgan, I think it was, and how in drought years there are more males. Environment, environmet, environment.

Also remeber reading about how in dioceious plants sex can be undertimend until a certain stage of growth. All this leads me to believe plant sex is a polygenetic trait, perhaps somewhat like siliacs in humans.

Started some solstice beans DCP, Honey Sunday, and @Schwaggy P 's Chocolate Trip.
 

genuity

Well-Known Member
Beyond light, I think temp and humidity plays a more prevalent role. I remember reading something about afgan, I think it was, and how in drought years there are more males. Environment, environmet, environment.

Also remeber reading about how in dioceious plants sex can be undertimend until a certain stage of growth. All this leads me to believe plant sex is a polygenetic trait, perhaps somewhat like siliacs in humans.

Started some solstice beans DCP, Honey Sunday, and @Schwaggy P 's Chocolate Trip.
Environment for sure..
 

MrToad69

Well-Known Member
Vegged quite a bit with blue and blue with some white when I first started with LEDs 8 years ago when I ran mostly Peak gear and ratios were always just over 50% female which was the same with cfls and hps. The plants though had almost no node spacing under blue light. I tried to make that blue work even adding a little white but white always seemed best regardless of source.

My question would be of what value are fem seeds if 90% plus females by using blue light?
Value of Fem's certainly go down when you can methodically change your growing environment to influence outcome of sex..However, the advantage of fem's...you save the bug-hunt, risk of missing a male, and having to turf the males is still an inefficiency..Lastly, when buying seeds, you know you can buy one seed and not risk get

  1. I guess it depends on two things..How much of a purist the grower is. Second, whether there is a concern the seeds that are feminized have a slight increase in Hermie tendencies
 

macsnax

Well-Known Member
Value of Fem's certainly go down when you can methodically change your growing environment to influence outcome of sex..However, the advantage of fem's...you save the bug-hunt, risk of missing a male, and having to turf the males is still an inefficiency..Lastly, when buying seeds, you know you can buy one seed and not risk get

  1. I guess it depends on two things..How much of a purist the grower is. Second, whether there is a concern the seeds that are feminized have a slight increase in Hermie tendencies
IDK if environment is going to sway fems like that. I do know however it's something like 1:30,000 a male will pop out of fems. Not trying to open a can of worms here either, a lot of times these topics come with really strong opinions, lol.
 

MrToad69

Well-Known Member
I'd have to agree Mac..

Fem's offer an excellent option for growers on a number of fronts...To reliably grow a female from one seed provides the opportunity to try a larger number of varieties..lower cost, less space.

Think of the days prior to the advent of "feminized" seeds..you'd want to buy and grow at least 3 seeds and probably more like five in order to insure you get at least one female (3-5x) cost..nurturing those males you hope are females..

The ability to order and pop 3 seeds, from 3 different strains, and get 3 budding females in a cost effective manner is an absolute Jackpot for growers IMO!!

Mr Toad
 

MrToad69

Well-Known Member
Well...official numbers from the 31 plants...

- 6 males out of the batch...
- 3 were significant Hermies
- 2 had single balls with a single pistil hangin' out.
- and the Tri-leaf that seems to have all I'm looking for..slightly delayed...but no pistils showing so far amongst the balls...

-I culled the 3 "project" destroyers...will cull the other two ..singleton..Hermies once I get a better confirmation that the Tri-leaf has no surprises..

This is a project aimed at producing a fast growing plant you can grow outdoors in Canada and finish. One that can blend in with the rest of your garden. So Tri-leaves and webbed leaves are perfect!
 

macsnax

Well-Known Member
I'd have to agree Mac..

Fem's offer an excellent option for growers on a number of fronts...To reliably grow a female from one seed provides the opportunity to try a larger number of varieties..lower cost, less space.

Think of the days prior to the advent of "feminized" seeds..you'd want to buy and grow at least 3 seeds and probably more like five in order to insure you get at least one female (3-5x) cost..nurturing those males you hope are females..

The ability to order and pop 3 seeds, from 3 different strains, and get 3 budding females in a cost effective manner is an absolute Jackpot for growers IMO!!

Mr Toad
Absolutely man, fems bring a lot of versatility to the table. There's also highly sought after strains that there's no male to make regs with, a versatile tool for the seed maker as well.
 

SSGrower

Well-Known Member
..nurturing those males you hope are females..
This is one way for a recessive polygenetic trait to slip through the cracks.
Fuck, this is the third 'male' I've found that has gone herm on re-veg. It was the last plant in my closet to show sex, it didn't show until flowering. View attachment 4442680View attachment 4442681
I hold the opinion this plant has enough recessive alleal (spelling is a problem for me you see i missed ciliacs above) pairings that the enviroment triggered what we generally consider a singular genetic trait. I also think as we are chucking there is a risk of reverting to monoecious strains, lets be careful chuckers we cant see the genetics, only the expressions.
 

MrToad69

Well-Known Member
This is one way for a recessive polygenetic trait to slip through the cracks.

I hold the opinion this plant has enough recessive alleal (spelling is a problem for me you see i missed ciliacs above) pairings that the enviroment triggered what we generally consider a singular genetic trait. I also think as we are chucking there is a risk of reverting to monoecious strains, lets be careful chuckers we cant see the genetics, only the expressions.
Nice to see some chuckers aware of the the implications of their tinkering..:)

The fundamental difference between gentotype and phenotype shows the importance of documentation and observation when breeding. Back-crossing helps to reveal those hidden traits within the pool of rare recessive traits...both good and bad.

It's also important for chuckers to understand Mendel's Law's , so that projects are more than just random stabs..Homozygous vs Heterozygous genotypes..and said identification, help determine the end goal, which constantly morphs and evolves in new directions...hopefully for the better.
 
Top