curious old fart
Well-Known Member
A 600 in each one would use less power and give better results.
cof
cof
Club 600
- Thread starter DST
- Start date
genuity
Well-Known Member
That would be a hard fit..(depending on the hood)...the SunSystem, no way...
A 600 like cof said,or 2 of them 630DE-R (but then you would need ballast, hood,220 hookup, $$$)
Smoking on some GHS cheese...
Mr.jojodancer305
Well-Known Member
Ok so just to be clear, 2 lec 315 on a scrog will not out produce a 1000watt under the same scrog?
Mr.jojodancer305
Well-Known Member
Don't get me wrong family, I love my 1000 but with the technology today we should be able to produce more for less not to mention fans and cooling them lights and venting that heat.
hippy132
Well-Known Member
more
genuity
Well-Known Member
This is not a scrog,....I just put some big ass plants under a net,it's 2 7gal pots
Under a AC/DE hood with a 630DE-R (they do make hood,that house 2 separate 315)
With a Lil more love..
That Shit is all beat up,I'm about to chop it tonight..well just some fucking mites...but what ever.
Under a AC/DE hood with a 630DE-R (they do make hood,that house 2 separate 315)
With a Lil more love..
That Shit is all beat up,I'm about to chop it tonight..well just some fucking mites...but what ever.
HydroRed
Well-Known Member
How did the Chocolate Skunk turn out for you?
ilovetoskiatalta
Well-Known Member
May I ask which bulbs you were using? I use the 4000k for veg and the 3100k for flower.I have a 315 nanolux and they are good for veg, but they can't compare to a 600 or a 1000 for bud size and weight. The plants that matured under the 315 weighed only 2/3'rd of the 600 weight.
cof
I think that electrical usage factors in with the 315cmh as well as the heat. I switched from t5 & 400mh 's in veg and 1000hps for flower.
My ballasts were magnetic.
It's just a different set up that has been effective and efficient for me.
I loved my three 1000hps but I do not have the space anymore. With that said if I did have that space again I would use the 315cmh just more of them. I have read differing opinions on how many 315 equal a
1000w hps.
I have to say my biggest issue is heat and that's why I like the 315cmh. I do not think there is much argument about how much cooler these lights run.
curious old fart
Well-Known Member
The bulb is a 3100k.
there is a 1000W de and 2 600's in the bloom room. I was using the 315 to fill in when the 1000 ballast went out to cover 6 plants instead of the 20+..
cof
there is a 1000W de and 2 600's in the bloom room. I was using the 315 to fill in when the 1000 ballast went out to cover 6 plants instead of the 20+..
cof
gr865
Well-Known Member
Not an expert on the 315's, but I switched from a 400W HPS & MH, I now have two 315's hanging in vertical grow.
Why I switched was wanting more light in my 4x4 without the extra heat. I had planned to run a 600 and 400 HPS vert but ended up getting a good deal on the 315's and I would not go back.
I have been told by multiple sources that the 315 will produce the equivalent of 500W per light w/o the heat.
Have not grow with a 600 or 1000 but I do know that this light our proforms the 400 HPS big time.
My last incidental grow was horizontal grow with one 315 and a SS400 LED side by side and I got a total was 15 zips. I was happy with that.
GR
Mr.jojodancer305
Well-Known Member
That's what I was thinking as well,that heat is a problem. I have a new green room and trying to set things up. The thought of 4 315"got me thinking and if thinvs don't work out I can hook up the 1000"s but that light bill is killer
Rusher
Well-Known Member
It was remarkable. I'm on vacation right now, and don't have access to my photos, but I pulled 3.85 zips dry of the best tasting smoke I have ever produced. More coffee than chocolate, but a good strong smoke. Great meds.
Sadly, it seems that 00 Seeds has not produced more of the CS, but have several other chocolate strains that I will investigate in the future.
whodatnation
Well-Known Member
Light dep coming along just fine,,, day 10-12/12
Everything is on irrigation in there.
Everything is on irrigation in there.
HydroRed
Well-Known Member
Thanks for replying. I have grown it out as well, but have yet to find anything regarding grows for the Chocolate Skunk FEM Photoperiod. Plenty of info and grows documenting the auto version though. I was def pleased with the weight and the bud structure, just wish it were a little stronger. I could see this being very popular with cash croppers.
Rusher
Well-Known Member
Interesting. I'm surprised that the auto version would draw so much attention, or perhaps that's my own dislike of autos in general. I found it to be quite strong, but that could simply be a different pheno within the strain.
DST
Well-Known Member
How you.manage to grow them under that 1 cfl is just amazing. You are one with the force
