cps and mmj card

whitegato777

Well-Known Member
I'm currently in a legal battle with my ex wife and I have a mmj card, don't smoke but second hand exposed. she made allegations to cps and i just volunteered to do a hair and pee test but i told cps i have a card but don't use. has anybody know if they have a legal right to intervene or have heard of them intervening even though you have a card?
 

whitegato777

Well-Known Member
36-2811. Presumption of medical use of marijuana; protections; civil penalty(Caution: 1998 Prop. 105 applies)A. There is a presumption that a qualifying patient or designated caregiver is engaged in the medical use of marijuana pursuant to this chapter.1. The presumption exists if the qualifying patient or designated caregiver:(a) Is in possession of a registry identification card.(b) Is in possession of an amount of marijuana that does not exceed the allowable amount of marijuana.2. The presumption may be rebutted by evidence that conduct related to marijuana was not for the purpose of treating or alleviating the qualifying patient's debilitating medical condition or symptoms associated with the qualifying patient's debilitating medical condition pursuant to this chapter.B. A registered qualifying patient or registered designated caregiver is not subject to arrest, prosecution or penalty in any manner, or denial of any right or privilege, including any civil penalty or disciplinary action by a court or occupational or professional licensing board or bureau:1. For the registered qualifying patient's medical use of marijuana pursuant to this chapter, if the registered qualifying patient does not possess more than the allowable amount of marijuana.2. For the registered designated caregiver assisting a registered qualifying patient to whom he is connected through the department's registration process with the registered qualifying patient's medical use of marijuana pursuant to this chapter if the registered designated caregiver does not possess more than the allowable amount of marijuana.3. For offering or providing marijuana to a registered qualifying patient or a registered designated caregiver for the registered qualifying patient's medical use or to a registered nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary if nothing of value is transferred in return and the person giving the marijuana does not knowingly cause the recipient to possess more than the allowable amount of marijuana.C. A physician shall not be subject to arrest, prosecution or penalty in any manner or denied any right or privilege, including but not limited to civil penalty or disciplinary action by the Arizona board of medical examiners or by any other business, occupational or professional licensing board or bureau, based solely on providing written certifications or for otherwise stating that, in the physician's professional opinion, a patient is likely to receive therapeutic or palliative benefit from the medical use of marijuana to treat or alleviate the patient's debilitating medical condition or symptoms associated with the debilitating medical condition, but nothing in this chapter prevents a professional licensing board from sanctioning a physician for failing to properly evaluate a patient's medical condition or otherwise violating the standard of care for evaluating medical conditions.D. No person may be subject to arrest, prosecution or penalty in any manner, or denied any right or privilege, including any civil penalty or disciplinary action by a court or occupational or professional licensing board or bureau, for:1. Providing a registered qualifying patient, a registered designated caregiver or a registered nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary with marijuana paraphernalia for purposes of a qualifying patient's medical use of marijuana.2. Being in the presence or vicinity of the medical use of marijuana authorized under this chapter.3. Assisting a registered qualifying patient with administering marijuana as authorized by this chapter.E. A registered nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary is not subject to prosecution; search or inspection, except by the department pursuant to section 36-2806, subsection H; seizure or penalty in any manner and may not be denied any right or privilege, including civil penalty or disciplinary action by a court or business licensing board or entity, for acting pursuant to this chapter and department regulations to acquire, possess, cultivate, manufacture, deliver, transfer, transport, supply, sell or dispense marijuana or related supplies and educational materials to registered qualifying patients, to registered designated caregivers on behalf of registered qualifying patients or to other registered nonprofit medical marijuana dispensaries.F. A registered nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary agent is not subject to arrest, prosecution, search, seizure or penalty in any manner and may not be denied any right or privilege, including civil penalty or disciplinary action by a court or occupational or professional licensing board or entity, for working or volunteering for a registered nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary pursuant to this chapter and department regulations to acquire, possess, cultivate, manufacture, deliver, transfer, transport, supply, sell or dispense marijuana or related supplies and educational materials to registered qualifying patients, to registered designated caregivers on behalf of registered qualifying patients or to other registered nonprofit medical marijuana dispensaries.G. Property, including all interests in the property, otherwise subject to forfeiture under title 13, chapter 39, that is possessed, owned or used in connection with the medical use of marijuana authorized under this chapter or acts incidental to the medical use of marijuana authorized under this chapter, is not subject to seizure or forfeiture. This subsection does not prevent civil forfeiture if the basis for the forfeiture is unrelated to the medical use of marijuana.H. Mere possession of, or application for, a registry identification card may not constitute probable cause or reasonable suspicion, nor may it be used to support the search of the person or property of the person possessing or applying for the registry identification card. The possession of, or application for, a registry identification card does not preclude the existence of probable cause if probable cause exists on other grounds.I. No school, landlord or employer may be penalized or denied any benefit under state law for enrolling, leasing to or employing a registered qualifying patient or a registered designated caregiver.
 

whitegato777

Well-Known Member
36-2813. Discrimination prohibited(Caution: 1998 Prop. 105 applies)A. No school or landlord may refuse to enroll or lease to and may not otherwise penalize a person solely for his status as a cardholder, unless failing to do so would cause the school or landlord to lose a monetary or licensing related benefit under federal law or regulations.B. Unless a failure to do so would cause an employer to lose a monetary or licensing related benefit under federal law or regulations, an employer may not discriminate against a person in hiring, termination or imposing any term or condition of employment or otherwise penalize a person based upon either:1. The person's status as a cardholder.2. A registered qualifying patient's positive drug test for marijuana components or metabolites, unless the patient used, possessed or was impaired by marijuana on the premises of the place of employment or during the hours of employment.C. For the purposes of medical care, including organ transplants, a registered qualifying patient's authorized use of marijuana must be considered the equivalent of the use of any other medication under the direction of a physician and does not constitute the use of an illicit substance or otherwise disqualify a registered qualifying patient from medical care.D. No person may be denied custody of or visitation or parenting time with a minor, and there is no presumption of neglect or child endangerment for conduct allowed under this chapter, unless the person's behavior creates an unreasonable danger to the safety of the minor as established by clear and convincing evidence.
 
I would clear it out whatever you have going on in your grow room, at least until the divorce has cooled down or is over. I wouldn't be so worried about testing clean, if you did smoke, you have a doctors order. However the point could be brought up about it not being safe enviroment for your kid... a buddy of mine had an ex bring it up in the divorce papers she filed against him... Things like the nutes she refered to as unsafe chemicals in the paper work. He was killed in a motorcycle crash so I did not see how it played out. but as for the your legal rights I would say your best bet is to talk to a divorce lawyer I have a feeling he will tell you the samething though
 

Lucius Vorenus

Well-Known Member
I would clear it out whatever you have going on in your grow room, at least until the divorce has cooled down or is over. I wouldn't be so worried about testing clean, if you did smoke, you have a doctors order. However the point could be brought up about it not being safe enviroment for your kid... a buddy of mine had an ex bring it up in the divorce papers she filed against him... Things like the nutes she refered to as unsafe chemicals in the paper work. He was killed in a motorcycle crash so I did not see how it played out. but as for the your legal rights I would say your best bet is to talk to a divorce lawyer I have a feeling he will tell you the samething though
100% agree
 

DesertGuru

Well-Known Member
Cps operates outside the normal courts jurisdiction in what they call family court. I would be very careful and get a hold of a lawyer asap. They are the trolls. Children are 5 times more likely to DIE in CPS custody than with birth parents. They are 12 more times likely to be RAPED by cps adults who are “caring for them”. They fill them up with perscription drugs etc. Their system makes TRILLIONS a year through the ASFA act in expediting adoptions from CPS kidnappings. This is child trafficking at its best. Had a childhood friend go through the horrors of that system. I detest it.
 

whitegato777

Well-Known Member
I would clear it out whatever you have going on in your grow room, at least until the divorce has cooled down or is over. I wouldn't be so worried about testing clean, if you did smoke, you have a doctors order. However the point could be brought up about it not being safe enviroment for your kid... a buddy of mine had an ex bring it up in the divorce papers she filed against him... Things like the nutes she refered to as unsafe chemicals in the paper work. He was killed in a motorcycle crash so I did not see how it played out. but as for the your legal rights I would say your best bet is to talk to a divorce lawyer I have a feeling he will tell you the samething though
thanks but the divorce was finished two years ago and i have cultivating on my card. shes just trying to make up bullsh!t so i cant see my kids. she was the one who pressed me to get the card.
 

BeaverHuntr

Well-Known Member
thanks but the divorce was finished two years ago and i have cultivating on my card. shes just trying to make up bullsh!t so i cant see my kids. she was the one who pressed me to get the card.
Dr. Dre said it best " Bitches aint nothing but ho's and tricks"
 

Wolfhound

Active Member
If I were dealing with CPS there would be no mmj card. Not worth it unless near death. My kids & family will always come first. This would be a risk not worth taking for me. I smoked/grew over my life without one problem & see this card as the first step to having problems.
Do you really need a card ? Just have it cancelled & start over once kids are safe.

Has she smoked ever ? end of story if she has . . .
 

hiluxphantom

Well-Known Member
actually she was the one who pushed me to get it so she would get in trouble for possession.
thats what I'm sayin man. just say u have reason to beleive she was dippin in ur stash then shed be the unfit one not you cuz ur legal where shes stealin your meds
 

UnderBelly

Active Member
I'm currently in a legal battle with my ex wife and I have a mmj card, don't smoke but second hand exposed. she made allegations to cps and i just volunteered to do a hair and pee test but i told cps i have a card but don't use. has anybody know if they have a legal right to intervene or have heard of them intervening even though you have a card?
I wouldn't ask for pot growing advice on a law forum.

You're way deep in this. I would have tried to nip it in the bud. Your ex disclosed Protected Health Information to a third party without your consent. I would have started from there. No way would I have "told CPS" one word that didn't come in the form of a written letter from my attorney.
 
Top