Cutting possible male

spek9 said:
People need to stop calling it marijuana and start calling it by its true name "Cannabis" long before I give a shit about some politically correct transgender wording of a hermaphrodite plant.
Click to expand...
Uh oh, sounds like someone being part of the problem, not part of the solution, LOL. Also, I never realized marijuana was considered politically incorrect in the “cannabis community.” Since we have to walk on egg shells about everything else, might as well be this also.
 
Mrs. Weedstein said:
Uh oh, sounds like someone being part of the problem, not part of the solution, LOL. Also, I never realized marijuana was considered politically incorrect in the “cannabis community.” Since we have to walk on egg shells about everything else, might as well be this also.
Click to expand...

It's my only beef. I could care less about all else to be honest :)

Everyone bickering about the wording of everything nowadays, yet there's no foundation of what the words truly mean.
 
spek9 said:
It's my only beef. I could care less about all else to be honest :)

Everyone bickering about the wording of everything nowadays, yet there's no foundation of what the words truly mean.
Click to expand...
I call em my pot plants. Guess i am part of the problem
 
Mrs. Weedstein said:
That’s offensive to life forms that don’t exist on Earth. I think the only way to avoid being offensive is pointing and grunting.
Click to expand...
That wouldn’t be asking too much either, at all. It’s human privilege, and we take it for granted. No one, even a non binary cannabis life form, should feel offended. 2 hearts I’m sorry
 
There’s thing I don’t get about 2Heart’s theory that what a lot of people identify as male nubbins are just females that haven’t fully formed yet and may still throw pistils.

Meanwhile, there are females that are obviously female and have obvious pistils on their preflowers a month after popping. I’m not saying this is impossible but it doesn’t seem likely.

In any case, I prefer the females that show pistils early and will use those for breeding while discouraging those that take forever — for that reason, it’s not that relevant whether those eternal nubbins are actually male.
 
Mrs. Weedstein said:
There’s thing I don’t get about 2Heart’s theory that what a lot of people identify as male nubbins are just females that haven’t fully formed yet and may still throw pistils.

Meanwhile, there are females that are obviously female and have obvious pistils on their preflowers a month after popping. I’m not saying this is impossible but it doesn’t seem likely.

In any case, I prefer the females that show pistils early and will use those for breeding while discouraging those that take forever — for that reason, it’s not that relevant whether those eternal nubbins are actually male.
Click to expand...
So that "selection" would achieve a faster flowering time. 2 hearts has a lot to learn, but it's ok. Everyone's journey is different and how we all take it is different. But facts are facts and we can't go spreading misinformation lol. Or that bro science stuff. I make myself lol
 
Well experience for him was, I guess always getting trans cannabis. So I understand why he’d think it’s due to grower error. Lots and lots of bro science indeed haha
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top