Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
LOL.Because you have zero clue about law. It has nothing to do with not liking you.
A lot of people said I didn't know anything about the law when I won my Religious Marijuana case also. So have fun thinking that.
LOL.Because you have zero clue about law. It has nothing to do with not liking you.
They were right too.LOL.
A lot of people said I didn't know anything about the law when I won my Religious Marijuana case also. So have fun thinking that.
Lol. Again, have fun thinking that.They were right too.
wait a minute,isn't all cola soda pop made from the extract of a Kola nut ,not the coca plant ?
last I knew the cola flavor was developed from the Kola nutts found in the tropics ,a reduction made from the Kola nutts is then turned into "cola syrup " and used to make all cola flavored soda pops .
How is coca cola involved when the coke we drink has never contained cocaine & is derived from Kola nutts instead of coca ?
I'm more confused than the last time around .
Lol. Pablo thinks that when the City filed their Scheduling Order for the Lawsuit (which I told them to file) that they achieved some great victory over me.
And he is one of the people who said I would never win my Religious Marijuana case. So he's 0 for 2 in regards to my cases. He is going to have to wait and see just like the rest of you.
... divided by a common language...
Fin, what you think you read is not what it means.
PS Yeah I know you think I'm wrong but let me ask you whose couch you sleeping on now?
Coca-Cola is made with both Coca and Kola. They took the Cocaine out at the beginning of the 1900s, but they still use Coca leaf extract that has the Cocaine taken out.
Read this:
http://www.nytimes.com/1988/07/01/business/how-coca-cola-obtains-its-coca.html
1. Please post where I claimed they achieved some great victory over you. I'll wait. You were ordered by Judge Pitman to file it. It's really not that big of a deal, but having them file it gives them an advantage.
2. You didn't sue the City, dummy. You should have, but you chose not to. That will hurt you in the near future.
Wrong. "Order for Proposed Scheduling Order. Plaintiff shall submit a proposed scheduling order to the Court within sixty (60) days after the appearance of any defendant. Proposed Scheduling Order due by 9/5/2016." You're the Plaintiff. You were ordered to submit the scheduling order, not the Defendant.
I never said they were ordered, I said I told them to do it. And I did, my exact wording was:
"The Federal Judge rejected your removal, submit a proposed scheduling order by September 5th. If you don't then I will make the Schedule"
So they filed it. Me being the one ordered to do it does not change the facts. And I did submit mine, so your whole point is moot.
thanks,I'll read the link now,there's so much conflicting info about coca cola I never know wtf to believe ,I've seen old bottles claiming to contain cocaine yet the official coca cola history says no coca plant material at all,I'll read the link,thanks .
Because you have zero clue about law. It has nothing to do with not liking you.
Are you sure about that? Yeah I admit it you are right LOL. I'm a terrier's bitch right now, brb have to take him out front and then cook him some beef.He's filed a lot more motions with the court than you have.
Why do you hate him?
Thanks.He's filed a lot more motions with the court than you have.
Why do you hate him?
Are you sure about that? Yeah I admit it you are right LOL. I'm a terrier's bitch right now, brb have to take him out front and then cook him some beef.
My service dog just had surgery. He is the one who made it possible for me to go out alone for the first time in 22 years. I owe him my life. I'm paying him back it's the least I can do. Now how about you explain your logic without a quote and paste?
My service dog just had surgery. He is the one who made it possible for me to go out alone for the first time in 22 years. I owe him my life. I'm paying him back it's the least I can do. Now how about you explain your logic without a quote and paste?
Wow, actual words. I had begun to think you were an aggregation bot and not actually human.Do you want an explanation of the DEA Lawsuit of the Police Department Lawsuit? Because we have kind of gotten in to both now. Everything Coca/Monopoly related is the DEA case (supported by the DOJ, a case from 2004 and a decision the DEA made this August), and everything relating to Texas Law and what Pablo is talking about is the Police Lawsuit.