freddythekruger
Well-Known Member
How many diplomatic relations does the VP partake in? I would like to know what you believe the VP actually does. This outta be interesting.
i would personally like a VP who actually knows what the VP does...
How many diplomatic relations does the VP partake in? I would like to know what you believe the VP actually does. This outta be interesting.
Not to mention, McCain served on a board with a shadowy ultra-right-wing organization involved with the Iran-Contra affair, and helped sell weapons to Iran to get weapons/funding for the pro-Nazi virulently anti-Semitic right-wing death squads in Nicaragua. He wanted to pull up old stuff -- well, there's some more. He's got more skeletons in his closet than a military graveyard has graves.
Just look at the list:
1) Was one of the Keating 5. Took expensive trips and received expensive gifts (bribes) from Keating in return for help in avoiding federal regulators. (Was called out for "lack of judgment" by his peers.)
2) Served on board of ultra-right-wing organization to help get funding for pro-nazi death squads in Nicaragua. His name was on their stationery for years.
3) Said in 2000 that negative campaigning was not something he'd be a part of, because the American people deserve better. (We don't deserve better anymore? Why does McCain think we suck now?)
4) Is involved with all kinds of Indian casino political shenanigans in Arizona and Nevada, helping some tribes, while not helping (or even actively working against) other tribes who compete with the tribes he likes the most.
5) Picked an incompetent for his running mate. (Guess that lack of judgment he was cited for is still as true today as it was during the Keating 5 scandal.)
6) Was a turncoat as a POW, telling his captors that his dad was an admiral, so that he'd get better treatment than the rest of the prisoners. Has been called out for that by some of those prisoners.
Combine his trust-destroying past with his erratic behavior of late, and it's easy to conclude that this man should be in a psychiatrist's office, not the Oval Office. I'd rather have NO record than THAT record.
YouTube - Manning's Fierce Prayer for Bristol Palin
Care to retract your statement?
Although they teach you in high school that a metaphor does not use "like" or "as", colloquially a metaphor is any comparison between two unlike things, whether they use "like" or "as" or not.
No I don't, that can easily be topped by someone who is a host on a vastly viewed media endorsed show, Keith friggin' Olbermann.
I am very aware of grammar, Dr.Pot, but I am not the one who misused the correct usage of a metaphor. It MUST be linked with "is" and it cannot be an adjective. Thanks.
I think thats called a simile. maybe.... i don't know.
A metaphor must be complete by having two topics compared by the word "is" rather than to a similarity which would use "like". Example: "The world is a vampire" than "The world is like a vampire"
The only two scenarios you deployed anything that would resemble a metaphor is
Hillary is a ball buster
Palin is a mindless bimbo
Those are not metaphors. Both "ball buster" and "bimbo" are adjectives. Please clarify what the hell you are talking about.
Keith Olberman can get pretty bad, I'll admit. But his level of vitriol is on par with Rush Limbaugh, and nowhere NEAR the same level of baseless hate as the guy I linked to.No I don't, that can easily be topped by someone who is a host on a vastly viewed media endorsed show, Keith friggin' Olbermann.
I am very aware of grammar, Dr.Pot, but I am not the one who misused the correct usage of a metaphor. It MUST be linked with "is" and it cannot be an adjective. Thanks.
I know what the correct definition of the word "metaphor" is, I'm just saying that most people don't split hairs when deciding what is and what is not a metaphor.
Keith Olberman can get pretty bad, I'll admit. But his level of vitriol is on par with Rush Limbaugh, and nowhere NEAR the same level of baseless hate as the guy I linked to.
Even though Rush and Keith are about on even terms as far as hate, Rush seems to be on the radio like 24/7 and Keith only has a half-hour show. Then there's Sean Hannity, who probably cancels out Keith entirely. There's Chirs Matthews who is in a similar vein as Bill O'Reilly. And then there are those other Republican tools whose names I don't remember because I never watch them. You've got to admit though, the right certainly does their share of hate-spewing.
I always just wrote Olbermann off as the left's version of Rush. To be honest, I never watch or listen to these shows anyway. But Rush is at least as hateful as Keith. How can one person be that angry all the time at "liberals"?You must not understand hate spewing. Sean Hannity doesn't hate spew, he may be impassioned in what he believes but he doesn't insult and use such derogatory speech that Keith does. Rush the same way. Plus, at least Fox puts liberals in their shows, Hannity is countered by Colmes, whereas Keith is countered by no one so he can just spew all day. Yes, I really hate that guy.
Ya'll are just a bunch of nuts worryin' bout what's gonna happen. Face it, if Obama gets in...he'll get knocked off by some yahoo and we get Biden. If McCain gets in he's probably gonna die of old age before his term ends and...we get wink wink nudge nudge Handicapper in the House and we go down the toilet also. If ANY of you think differently, your political views are limited to voting per your party and that's it. You are merely lemmings following the leader over the cliff to your death. Think people...who is going to work for us? the tokers that actually keep this country running.
From your statements I can gather the assumption that you do have a hint of jealously toward Palin and the fact that she is not from your party will incur that much more wrath creating this fictional, "mindless bimbo" you have her portrayed as in your own mind. Actions speak louder than words, misshestermoffitt something liberals never understand.
we opposed u for being hypocritesI'm entirely confused about this. apparently when the Republicans opposed Clinton as President we were being sexist, but now that we are supporting Palin we are thinking with our dicks.
I'm sorry, but I'm just a bit confused about the logic that you are using.
Why do you keep insisting that I'm jealous of her? Her family is a fucking wreck. Her daughter obviously can't talk to her about important issues such as family planning. I guess you just can't teach family planning if you have no sense of family planning yourself. She can't figure out how to avoid pregnancy at the age of 44, yet you want her to be second in command?
I also have stated about a hundred times on various forums that I am NOT a fan of Obama. I have no political party because of the simple fact that they are all corrupt to the core.
Do you understand yet, I can not be jealous of a person who's life I think is a firm example of how NOT to run a family. Her entire family is a shining example of lack of communication, lack of birth control (her and her daughter both), lack of intelligence even. Why else would she begin a debate by saying that she would only answer the questions she wanted to answer, could it be that she has no fucking idea about anything else?
The launch button metaphor that you were to thick to get was that if she were ever the one to make an important decision, she would be confused and fuck it up. If she reserves the right to not answer questions that she is asked, she is probably going to reserve the right to not deal with issues she doesn't understand. I'm sure there a lot of issues she doesn't understand, such as the teen pregnancy epidemic in this country. She only has the one pregnant teenager in her house, it's not enough to get her attention yet.
What actions are you speaking of? Saying no to the "bridge to nowhere" yet going ahead and building the road to the bridge to nowhere, or saying no to the bridge after accepting the funding for it?![]()