Does Smoking Weed Kill Brain Cells?

poplars said:

dude I've read books....why couldn't you just take my word for it.... peace

Click to expand...

Brick Top said:

I was just breaking your balls a little because when you said; "man usually I'm all for reading huge posts... but those posts are wayyy too big for me" it was as if you made it appear as if my message was longer and more difficult to read than the full script for "Hamlet" or something.

I have at times over the years while being a member of several or more growing sites at a time wondered if people's messages were charted, their length, how in depth they go, how detailed their information is, if they support it with verifiable facts etc. and then people were asked what type of herb they smoke, or at least mainly smoke, if you would find that at least most of the longer more detailed messages supported with verifiable proof were from sativa smokers and the one to seven or eight like vague messages were written by those who smoked indicas.

I have wondered something similar about comments on message length. Some people read the longest messages word for word and some will say they took one look at the length and said, no way am I reading that. I wonder if at least most who would read the longest posts very time would mainly be sativa smokers and the ones that say, no way José would mainly be indica smokers.

I would not be at all surprised if at least in a slim majority of each case, not not a large majority, that is how it would be.

One equates to motivation and the other equates to lack of motivation .. and being that this is a growing site where it would be common for at least most of us to be high or stoned at least a fair bit of the time we are online, if not most or all the time we are online, if someone is not motivated enough to read something longer than just a few lines or to write something longer than just a few lines ... or visa versa if it might be telling us their preference in what they smoke, that of course being indica or sativa.

Click to expand...

Brick Top said:

I was just breaking your balls a little because when you said; "man usually I'm all for reading huge posts... but those posts are wayyy too big for me" it was as if you made it appear as if my message was longer and more difficult to read than the full script for "Hamlet" or something.

I have at times over the years while being a member of several or more growing sites at a time wondered if people's messages were charted, their length, how in depth they go, how detailed their information is, if they support it with verifiable facts etc. and then people were asked what type of herb they smoke, or at least mainly smoke, if you would find that at least most of the longer more detailed messages supported with verifiable proof were from sativa smokers and the one to seven or eight like vague messages were written by those who smoked indicas.

I have wondered something similar about comments on message length. Some people read the longest messages word for word and some will say they took one look at the length and said, no way am I reading that. I wonder if at least most who would read the longest posts very time would mainly be sativa smokers and the ones that say, no way José would mainly be indica smokers.

I would not be at all surprised if at least in a slim majority of each case, not not a large majority, that is how it would be.

One equates to motivation and the other equates to lack of motivation .. and being that this is a growing site where it would be common for at least most of us to be high or stoned at least a fair bit of the time we are online, if not most or all the time we are online, if someone is not motivated enough to read something longer than just a few lines or to write something longer than just a few lines ... or visa versa if it might be telling us their preference in what they smoke, that of course being indica or sativa.

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by Brick Top
I was just breaking your balls a little because when you said; "man usually I'm all for reading huge posts... but those posts are wayyy too big for me" it was as if you made it appear as if my message was longer and more difficult to read than the full script for "Hamlet" or something.

I have at times over the years while being a member of several or more growing sites at a time wondered if people's messages were charted, their length, how in depth they go, how detailed their information is, if they support it with verifiable facts etc. and then people were asked what type of herb they smoke, or at least mainly smoke, if you would find that at least most of the longer more detailed messages supported with verifiable proof were from sativa smokers and the one to seven or eight like vague messages were written by those who smoked indicas.

I have wondered something similar about comments on message length. Some people read the longest messages word for word and some will say they took one look at the length and said, no way am I reading that. I wonder if at least most who would read the longest posts very time would mainly be sativa smokers and the ones that say, no way José would mainly be indica smokers.

I would not be at all surprised if at least in a slim majority of each case, not not a large majority, that is how it would be.

One equates to motivation and the other equates to lack of motivation .. and being that this is a growing site where it would be common for at least most of us to be high or stoned at least a fair bit of the time we are online, if not most or all the time we are online, if someone is not motivated enough to read something longer than just a few lines or to write something longer than just a few lines ... or visa versa if it might be telling us their preference in what they smoke, that of course being indica or sativa.

Click to expand...

Wolverine97 said:

Interesting hypothesis. Can you tell what I'm smoking now?

Click to expand...

Brick Top said:

Of course to see if my hypothesis holds any water or not a large number of messages would have to be charted and then the people whose messages were charted would have to be asked what they smoke or mostly smoke.

After that, if what I believe to be possible is correct, there would be better than average chance of saying ... that is at least if your message hadn't followed my hypothesis, of sorts, where it would be likely that someone might want to have a little fun and alter what they would normally do to greatly increase the odds of an inaccurate response.

Click to expand...

Wolverine97 said:

Good response, still smiling about the last part. At the time I was smoking Casey Jones, but I tend to keep my comments short regardless. Time becomes an issue for me, I think some people are just naturally inclined to keep things short. Now I'm smoking some nice DJ Short Blueberry because I want to go to sleep.

Click to expand...

Serapis said:

Could the OP please repeat the question..... I uh...... couldn't hear it. Yeah, I couldn't hear it from here...

Click to expand...

Icyblaze said:

ill check "the union" out.. thanks

Click to expand...

RC7 said:

no its far from the truth.There are many articles that suggest cannabis may actually stimulate brain cell growth....do some research on google or watch documentaries such as "the union"

Click to expand...

Dwezelitsame said:

i wish i knew

Click to expand...