UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
is this a serious question?Did legislation stop racism?
is this a serious question?Did legislation stop racism?
Yup. Cat got your tounge? The times put racism down more than anything in fact laws are what oppress black people laws put in place by Clinton a Democrap.is this a serious question?
What about the home invasion on a friend 10 miles away? Him and his damn near wife are dead and he didn't have a gun.actually no. owning a gun or not has no bearing on that. we are both equally likely to be the victim of a home invasion or assault.
it is just that your gun is many, many times more likely to end up killing you or your family than that imaginary home invader you whine like a little bitch over.
Did you just realize the Clinton's are what you accuse Trump off??is this a serious question?
That trope "why don't we ban pools, because they kill people too" is so old and idiotic. If gun owners would follow the safety guidelines laid out by their own lobby group, gun accidents would be non existent. And, there are laws in municipalities that require fences around pools. Nobody thinks there is anything wrong about them.Cause like owning a pool is a constitutional right too eh???
How about realizing that freedom means allowing other people to do things you dont like.
Stop trying to legislate against what might happen...
does that single case, which sounds completely made up by some moron on the internet, change the statistics over tens of thousands of cases?What about the home invasion on a friend 10 miles away? Him and his damn near wife are dead and he didn't have a gun.
Lets follow your thinking to it's logical conclusion shall we?That idiotic why don't we ban pools, because they kill people too is so old and idiotic. If gun owners would follow the safety guidelines laid out by their own lobby group, gun accidents would be non existent. There is nothing unconstitutional about being smart. You seem to think otherwise.
are you saying that all gun laws should be abolished then?Lets follow your thinking to it's logical conclusion shall we?
If gun owners would follow the safety guidelines...
Who is going to enforce these said safety guidelines?
Are gun owners now going to be forced to submit to random gun safety checks? How is this supposed to work?
Or are you just in favor of higher punishments? I mean if you are talking about that, it probably wont stop much negligence.
You call me stupid then propose a system in which peoples freedoms are restricted based on things you dont like. Maybe you dont see the irony.
I dont see all those same voters coming out for Hillary but I could be wrong.NPR should be ashamed of itself for publishing dreck like this. So much for the famous news organization that wasn't biased because it didn't take advertising money... now, it does both, and its credibility is an obvious casualty;
http://www.npr.org/2016/04/26/475681237/campaign-mystery-why-dont-bernie-sanders-big-rallies-lead-to-big-wins
Just to be clear; big rallies mean lots of voters care enough to turn out to see the candidate. As such, those crowds are am excellent indicator of how well the candidate is rescuing the electorate. The article glosses over the obvious fact that American primaries are completely rigged, from closed primaries to 'superdelegates'.
Too funny this. Safety guidelines are posted by the NRA on their site. They are pretty good and not hard to follow. Nobody enforces them. If people just follow them, almost no accidents. Difficult for you to understand, I know.Lets follow your thinking to it's logical conclusion shall we?
If gun owners would follow the safety guidelines...
Who is going to enforce these said safety guidelines?
Are gun owners now going to be forced to submit to random gun safety checks? How is this supposed to work?
Or are you just in favor of higher punishments? I mean if you are talking about that, it probably wont stop much negligence.
You call me stupid then propose a system in which peoples freedoms are restricted based on things you dont like. Maybe you dont see the irony.
You have to ask yourself why, though.What about the home invasion on a friend 10 miles away? Him and his damn near wife are dead and he didn't have a gun..
Of course, with a gun he would have had a chance and true story him and his damn near wife murdered at about 25 years old by someone else I know. I happen to know some bad people I wish I didn't but people change.does that single case, which sounds completely made up by some moron on the internet, change the statistics over tens of thousands of cases?
It was not a good reason the guys girl kicked the guy out of their home he came back with a gun. Might be a little more to the story but still...You have to ask yourself why, though.
Well, not exactly home invasion.It was not a good reason the guys girl kicked the guy out of their home he came back with a gun. Might be a little more to the story but still...
Well still kick in the door wave in the .44 and he stole shit.Well, not exactly home invasion.
Wait did I just describe a home invasion?? Yeah I think so.Well still kick in the door wave in the .44 and he stole shit.