No, sir. You are wrong. That analogy wouldn't hold a water balloon.
Different design = different placement
For example:
Squirrel Cage fans = PUSH
In-line fans = PULL
E
That is not correct.
Both the squirrel cage and in line fans are capable of pulling and pushing air. The difference is the amount of static pressure, or suction, the fan develops.
The in-line fan is an axial blade design. Such a design is great at moving a lot of CFM, but very poor in developing static pressure, or suction. Static pressure overcomes resistance to flow, as in the case of ductwork: the squirrel cage fan will operate more efficiently, i.e. closer to the advertised CFM rating of the fan, with ductwork attached more than the in line fan.
Squirrel cage fans have a centrifugal blade design. They develop a LOT more static pressure/suction than the in line fan.
The difference? Take two fans, both drawing 300 CFMs. One is centrifugal blade design, the other axial blade design. Hook six feet of ductwork to the intake of each fan. The centrifugal fan will clearly outperform the axial blade fan in both suction power and total CFMs moved.
Remember, with ANY fan, best performance will be achieved with minimal ductwork on both intake and exhaust ends.
Best fans of the market today are the Can Max brand fans. They are the only fan I could find with performance information published by the manufacturer and with ratings according to AMCA, the ventilation industry professional organization that publishes fan testing standards and practices, among other things:
http://www.canfilters.com/max_fan_6.html
http://www.amca.org/