“Fast Version”

Beeswings

Well-Known Member
No it’s half auto it’s called fast
You got a link to these fast seeds and what they do? Interesting concept I've never heard of before. I'm fairly certain that all autos are really only part ruderalis. As far as actually growing good weed, ruderalis sucks but they try and breed the auto flower trait of it into good photo weed and try to select next generations with less ruderalis traits except the auto part.
 

amneziaHaze

Well-Known Member
You got a link to these fast seeds and what they do? Interesting concept I've never heard of before. I'm fairly certain that all autos are really only part ruderalis. As far as actually growing good weed, ruderalis sucks but they try and breed the auto flower trait of it into good photo weed and try to select next generations with less ruderalis traits except the auto part.
It would be cool to get a pure ruderalis to taste it.
 

808Med

Member
Can you clone fast versions?

“Excessive Growth”, sounds interesting!

You mean like each stage will be rapid?
 

808Med

Member
You got a link to these fast seeds and what they do? Interesting concept I've never heard of before. I'm fairly certain that all autos are really only part ruderalis. As far as actually growing good weed, ruderalis sucks but they try and breed the auto flower trait of it into good photo weed and try to select next generations with less ruderalis traits except the auto part.
It’s a fraction of AutoFlower smaller than Auto.

Basically it’s a new method.
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Unga Bunga

Well-Known Member
If they don't flower without reduced lighting then theoretically you can keep a mother . The only problem I see is though I have no personal experience Crop King is not highly regarded .
 

conor c

Well-Known Member
They are fine as mothers if its a f1 fast version you talking about and idk about most fast versions but killer kush from sweet seeds isnt a bad one tho for example
 

ProPheT 216

Well-Known Member
I honestly think it's a hype term. Fast seems to be used when a auto line fails to auto and now they are called fast photos. But when I have a auto that fails to auto and I have to change light schedule, it sure isn't a faster plant at all. I think it's a hype bs term honestly, a way to sell failed autoflower lines like they are photos. They still have the ruderalis gene and you can always taste it in my opinion. So why would you want something that tastes like an autoflower that does not auto?
 

conor c

Well-Known Member
I honestly think it's a hype term. Fast seems to be used when a auto line fails to auto and now they are called fast photos. But when I have a auto that fails to auto and I have to change light schedule, it sure isn't a faster plant at all. I think it's a hype bs term honestly, a way to sell failed autoflower lines like they are photos. They still have the ruderalis gene and you can always taste it in my opinion. So why would you want something that tastes like an autoflower that does not auto?
They serve a purpose but there better for outdoors imo
 

coreywebster

Well-Known Member
Just means a quicker turnaround, inside or out.
I guess more benefit inside .



Well since I've been coming across a lot of these lately and seemed to come out of nowhere, this thread at least make me read up on it.. so learnt something.

 

Kola_Kreator

Well-Known Member
No such thing as a fast version. It's just marketing bs. Cannabis needs a minimum of 8 weeks to flower. And considering that most autos need even longer than 8 the concept of making faster flowering photo periods by breeding them with autos is downright stupid.
 
Top