ChiefRunningPhist
Well-Known Member
I could be wrong or looking at the wrong product but it looked like (12) 312s have the greater board real estate.
@budman410 im not sure if you'll need any extra sheeting for the 312s but would at least scope some out in case you do. The QB120s don't need any heatsinking at 70w, and your equivalent wattage density would put you at 51.83w to match the same threshold (although idk what the QB120 board thickness is). I'd watch them but I'm guessing you'll be fine.
EDIT:
These are the products I was referencing...
QB312...
28.4cm × 17.4cm = 497.64cm2
497.64 × 12 = 5,971.68cm2 (12) QB312's
QB800...
(35.43in × 2.54cm/in) × (7.24in × 2.54 cm/in) = 1654.92cm2
1654.92 × 3 = 4,964.76cm2 (3) QB800s
@budman410 im not sure if you'll need any extra sheeting for the 312s but would at least scope some out in case you do. The QB120s don't need any heatsinking at 70w, and your equivalent wattage density would put you at 51.83w to match the same threshold (although idk what the QB120 board thickness is). I'd watch them but I'm guessing you'll be fine.
EDIT:
These are the products I was referencing...
QB312...
28.4cm × 17.4cm = 497.64cm2
497.64 × 12 = 5,971.68cm2 (12) QB312's
QB800...
(35.43in × 2.54cm/in) × (7.24in × 2.54 cm/in) = 1654.92cm2
1654.92 × 3 = 4,964.76cm2 (3) QB800s
Last edited: