HydroKid239
Well-Known Member
I got something that looks like a pretty indica.
It’s a bagseed, so it should be interesting.
Edit: my luck it’s a male.
For The Person Who Has Never Seen Type II/Indica's Without Leaf Tip Burn
- Thread starter Charles U Farley
- Start date
It’s a bagseed, so it should be interesting.
Edit: my luck it’s a male.
rkymtnman
Well-Known Member
there is tip burn all over those plants. lmao!!!!!
twentyeight.threefive
Well-Known Member
There’s more than tip burn going on there.
Splinter7
Well-Known Member
what's wrong with tip burn...never noticed it to be bad, just an indication i gave enough food...like when ur kid gets chubby from all the chicken fried steak and ding dongs, he still kicks the other kids asses on the playground.
rkymtnman
Well-Known Member
i just was pointing out the irony since the thread title claims no leaf tip burn. lol.
rkymtnman
Well-Known Member
well, it would be too much food if you burned them. so your kid is fat too?? fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go thru life, son.
Splinter7
Well-Known Member
no one is drunk and nor stupid. i would rather be 5lbs overweight than 5lbs underweight when it mattered. fight me yo...i am bigger than you and your underfed plants.
rkymtnman
Well-Known Member
Hollatchaboy
Well-Known Member
Ugggg.... all leaves, no calyxes.
Splinter7
Well-Known Member
lighten up, cupcake.
it's a line from animal house.
no hard feelings, lol...i just think overfed is better than underfed from personal experience. most people/plants would agree that too much food feels a lot better than too little. i thought it would have been cool to have green plants with lots of leaves the whole way through. the yellowest and burnt grows have always given me more bud, the green grow not as much. if you get nute burn, it stays there permanently...so you can just nute up until that happens and dial back a bit to get to near max food supply/intake.
twentyeight.threefive
Well-Known Member
I know. Even from 10ft away and blurry you can tell those had major issues. Nothing like claiming one thing and posting evidence to the contrary.
Brettman
Well-Known Member
Mmmm … Larf paradise…
blueberrymilkshake
Well-Known Member
It certainly shows
Budzbuddha
Well-Known Member
Hmmm … it’s a “ Miracle “
xtsho
Well-Known Member
Not when I was in school. The fat kids always got picked on and their asses beaten.
PJ Diaz
Well-Known Member
Budzbuddha
Well-Known Member
In case anyone wants to know.
Miracle-Grow Moisture Control Potting Mix 0.21-0.11-0.16 Guaranteed Analysis F1144: Total Nitrogen (N) (a Portion of the Nitrogen, Phosphate and Potash Has Been Coated to Provide [0.12%] Coated Slow Release Nitrogen [N], [0.04%] Coated Slow Release Available Phosphate [P2O5] and [0.08%] Coated Slow Release Soluble Potash [K2O]) (0.21%), Ammoniacal Nitrogen (0.113%), Nitrate Nitrogen (0.097%), Available Phosphate (P2O5) (a Portion of the Nitrogen, Phosphate and Potash Has Been Coated to Provide [0.12%] Coated Slow Release Nitrogen [N], [0.04%] Coated Slow Release Available Phosphate [P2O5] and [0.08%] Coated Slow Release Soluble Potash [K2O]) (0.11%), Soluble Potash (K2O) (a Portion of the Nitrogen, Phosphate and Potash Has Been Coated to Provide [0.12%] Coated Slow Release Nitrogen [N], [0.04%] Coated Slow Release Available Phosphate [P2O5] and [0.08%] Coated Slow Release Soluble Potash [K2O]) (0.16%), ,Derived from Polymer-Coated: Ammonium Nitrate, Ammonium Phosphate, Calcium Phosphate, and Potassium Sulfate; and Ammonium Nitrate, Ammonium Phosphate, Calcium Phosphate, and Potassium Sulfate.
Polymers used ? Who fucking knows
Miracle-Grow Moisture Control Potting Mix 0.21-0.11-0.16 Guaranteed Analysis F1144: Total Nitrogen (N) (a Portion of the Nitrogen, Phosphate and Potash Has Been Coated to Provide [0.12%] Coated Slow Release Nitrogen [N], [0.04%] Coated Slow Release Available Phosphate [P2O5] and [0.08%] Coated Slow Release Soluble Potash [K2O]) (0.21%), Ammoniacal Nitrogen (0.113%), Nitrate Nitrogen (0.097%), Available Phosphate (P2O5) (a Portion of the Nitrogen, Phosphate and Potash Has Been Coated to Provide [0.12%] Coated Slow Release Nitrogen [N], [0.04%] Coated Slow Release Available Phosphate [P2O5] and [0.08%] Coated Slow Release Soluble Potash [K2O]) (0.11%), Soluble Potash (K2O) (a Portion of the Nitrogen, Phosphate and Potash Has Been Coated to Provide [0.12%] Coated Slow Release Nitrogen [N], [0.04%] Coated Slow Release Available Phosphate [P2O5] and [0.08%] Coated Slow Release Soluble Potash [K2O]) (0.16%), ,Derived from Polymer-Coated: Ammonium Nitrate, Ammonium Phosphate, Calcium Phosphate, and Potassium Sulfate; and Ammonium Nitrate, Ammonium Phosphate, Calcium Phosphate, and Potassium Sulfate.
Polymers used ? Who fucking knows
Budzbuddha
Well-Known Member
Apparently bag batches come from multiple sources - new hampshire blends / texas blends / etc.
So the probability of different versions in bag is there.
They rotate coir and pith - processed “ forest products “ I.E . ( sawdust / mill waste ) and full urea based elements. Urea is for great fertilizer bombs.
Hardly worthy for ornamental use yet alone eating this shit.
I’m sure a little more digging will expose more interesting things.
So the probability of different versions in bag is there.
They rotate coir and pith - processed “ forest products “ I.E . ( sawdust / mill waste ) and full urea based elements. Urea is for great fertilizer bombs.
Hardly worthy for ornamental use yet alone eating this shit.
I’m sure a little more digging will expose more interesting things.
bam0813
Well-Known Member
Id rather be lean and 5 light if the 5 extra is fat. You’ll be winded and pieced up
