FOX News Threatens Sheen & Cuban Not to Make Film

pauliojr

Well-Known Member
I am so sick and tired of people trying to cover up the 9/11 attacks. There is proof beyond proof that it was indeed an inside job. Check out this link on what FOX news had to say about Charlie Sheen, Rosie Oddonnell, and Mark Cuban backing the so called "conspiracy theory". It makes me sick that lies are being fed through mainstream media. If anyone gets a chance, watch anything that ALEX JONES does. He is a true patriot and believes in his country, but not the wackos that are running it!

FOX News Threatens Sheen & Cuban Not to Make Film
 

pauliojr

Well-Known Member
Alex Jones is quite prolific. "proof beyond proof" is a bit of a stretch... :)
I do not believe it is a stretch at all. It has been over 5 years since 9/11 happened and tons of studies have been done. Of course you will NEVER see any of these in the mainstream. Luckily the internet is readily available. I mean come one, just watching the building fall in a controlled demolition was more then enough. The building was made from reinforced steel. The only way for it to fall would be from the bottom. And then you have a 3rd buliding fall that wasn't even attacked!!!! It blows my mind that people still believe it was a couple of towel heads with box cutters.

I watched a speech (that someone in my family also attended to see) that had the main maintenance man of one of the towers saying a few days before the attacks, the very bottom of the tower was sectioned off by the government ( I forget if it was FBI, CIA, whatever). No one was allowed down there, not even the maintenance men or local police. On 9/11, the man was on the floor above the basement and said there was a huge explosion below him. He said he shot up from the floor and actually hit the ceiling!! Then a few minutes later, the 1st plane hit! Can you believe that shit!??

After the attacks he was telling his story to people and the government basically offered him a job and whatever he wanted as long as he didn't talk about what happened ever again. The man basically said, "FUCK THAT, THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED!" and he has been telling his story ever since. I give this man a lot of credit for he is probably looked at as a "Conspiracy Theorist" or whatever.

I do believe Alex Jones gets extremely excited if you will, but does not lie and tells it how it is! I applaud Alex Jones for everything he has done. The truth is not a stretch!
 

CannaBoss

Well-Known Member
All you have to do to understand that this was indeed an inside job, and that
the towers and WTC 7 were controlled demolitions and NOT a result of fires,
is look at how those buildings fell. They collapsed directly down into their own footprints. How convienient...
Also,the countless eye witnesses hearing multiple blasts from the basement and top floors.
Then the owner of WTC 7 saying that they had to "pull it" because the
NYFD couldn't control the fire.
How could they demo that building on Sept. 11th if there were not explosives
already set in those buildings? It takes weeks of prep. to demo a building.

I believe that 19 foriegn men taking over 4 planes simulataniously with box cutters and flying them into the towers and Pentagon sounds like the biggest "conspiracy theory" of them all.
Thanks Mr. Bush:spew: Is it 2008 yet?
 

CannaBoss

Well-Known Member
if you watch the Zapruder film closely, you can see the driver (William Grier)
is the one who shoots JFKs' head off. Youtube it and see.
 

pauliojr

Well-Known Member
I'm sure some people tend to exaggerate, but the maintenance man who worked at one of the buildings told exactly what happened!!

1. DAYS BEFORE ATTACKS THE GOVERNMENT BLOCKS OFF BASEMENT
2. EXPLOSION IN BASEMENT FIRST (Day of 9/11)
3. PEOPLE ON THE FLOOR ABOVE FLY TO THE CEILING
4. MINUTES LATER THE 1ST PLANE HIT!

I'm not sure about you, but that is enough evidence for me. There would be no reason for this man to lie about what happened. When he talks he gets so into his speeches and you can almost "feel" that what he is saying is the truth. Everything about 9/11 was wrong.
 

7xstall

Well-Known Member
i don't know if you already know this Wavels, but that article was written by Michael Chertoff's cousin. i'm sure you know that MC was the first head of Homeland Security.

a good friend of mine has dug into this conspiracy more than anyone i know. he's not crazy and he's not a leftist but he is convinced that parts of our government and other governments were involved. some of the stuff he's dug up is very scary.

anyway, i just wanted to mention that there are point by point rebuttals to the article you posted because i don't know if you've seen them.
 

ViRedd

New Member
I have a question:

If the government (Bushies) were behind the Tower implosion that would mean that our government insiders were willing to kill up to 25,000 people at one time. That's how many people were in the towers at other times.

So ... if the Insiders were willing to murder 25,000 people, and were successful killing 3000, why in the world don't they kill the maintainance man to keep him quiet instead of just "offering him a job?" :hump:

Vi
 

pauliojr

Well-Known Member
I have a question:

If the government (Bushies) were behind the Tower implosion that would mean that our government insiders were willing to kill up to 25,000 people at one time. That's how many people were in the towers at other times.

So ... if the Insiders were willing to murder 25,000 people, and were successful killing 3000, why in the world don't they kill the maintainance man to keep him quiet instead of just "offering him a job?" :hump:

Vi
To be honest Vi, I have no idea. Maybe that would seem even more suspicious if they did kill him because they had to know he was telling people what happened. No matter what the truth will come out eventually. I guess it is just a matter of time. They probably just let him go thinking most people would think he was a nut job or something. Who knows, but everything about the day does not add up. It doesn't matter who did it, it was fucked up in general. It kills me to know how many innocent people had to die and are still dying now from attacks like that. These people could still be enjoying life today and it sucks to know on either side that there are people who would do this bull shit. Maybe we will never know for sure, but something is definitely fishy.
 

7xstall

Well-Known Member
this is very condensed, very simplified.

the most solid believers in the conspiracy theory, the ones who have really done their studies like my friend, believe there was a paradigm shift in the power of the ultra insiders, Illuminati or whatever you want to call them..

they didn't want to kill 25,000, that's why there really were fire drills in the towers just before 9/11 with practice evacuations and there really are multiple confirmations of "mysterious maintenance men" having entire floors closed to the public the week before 9/11 also. their (Ill. pls.) strategy with this whole thing (supposedly) is to make the US appear weak, they want our country to be perceived as vulnerable to the rogue states like DPRK, Iran, the USSR (which does still exist, though not on paper.)

they conjured up this whole "Islamic terror" thing so as to send the US on a "cat herding" mission which is ultimately un-winnable but will however result in long term dramatic improvements to our military system. they wanted to "purge" the US's aging military machinery and have it more advanced than the cold-war era hardware we've been sitting on. this is in preparation for the ultimate show down, the one between the US and China/USSR. all the oil stuff, the islam stuff, it's all distraction and the American public is eating it up. while all this middle east stuff goes on, the union between the US and Canada and Mexico towards forming a new North American Union is in high gear...ie. Bush's comments the other day.



.
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member





To a certain extent there is a game of "bait and switch" afoot!
The encroachment of US sovereignty by means of this insidious North American Super highway is cause for concern and angst.


anyway, i just wanted to mention that there are point by point rebuttals to the article you posted because i don't know if you've seen them.
Hi 7x, yes I have seen these so called rebuttals....I do not consider the ones I have seen to be credible.....I have heard Alex Jones on the radio .... (Coast to Coast AM) COAST TO COAST AM WITH GEORGE NOORY
I do not find him to be credible.
You may have seen some evidence that I have not?
For anyone interested in a lively debate on this issue:
YouTube - 9/11 Debate: Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics pt. 1

Vi's point focuses on the true weakness of these conspiracy theories...
If the US Government were as nefarious and malignantly evil as suggested by these theories, why is ANYONE left to blow any whistles?....It does not make sense to me. Certainly this monstrous government would have the capability to squash ANYONE who was to tell the "truth"
Besides this point Bushco is out of office soon.....will the new Administration comply with this established, criminal behavior?

 

7xstall

Well-Known Member
yes Wavels, reliable sources are very hard to find and i do not believe Alex Jones is more than 50% credible either. if you sift through the obvious BS you will eventually arrive at less obvious BS and so on, this friend of mine is very good at this, very steadfast. we worked together for a couple years around the time of 9/11. after this i'll paste in his initial response when i mentioned the PM article in an email exchange we were having last year, you can discard or ponder.


what you and ViRedd point out as weakness is actually the profound strength of the conspiracy, if it exists. i've grown weed right out in the open and no one has seen it. i used to hide my peace pipe on the ledge of trim above the inside of my closet doors, when cops raided my room as a teen they found a couple bags and weren't satisfied so they tore the room apart, one of them was standing directly under my pipe while he asked "where is your pipe?" i laughed at him and said, "pipe for what?" they never found it and it was the least well hidden thing in my room.

you get my point.

from a conspiracy POV, the administration isn't really involved, at least not directly. he wouldn't dirty his hands with this, nor would the brokers allow him to so caustically tarnish his image. the real power brokers aren't in the spot light, they aren't even familiar to plebeians like us. they let just enough "witnesses" go and tell the "truth" to make themselves appear wacko and then everyone will write them off. the truth literally "sets them free".


===========

Yeah, I read this a long time ago. It is a whitewash. For starters, the article was written by Ben Chertoff, the cousin of Michael Chertoff over Homeland Security (confirmed by phone call to Ben's mom). Second, the CEO of PM, Victor Ganzi, is good friends with Jeb Bush's wife and on the same board of directors for Columbia University. PM has long been know as a front organzation and Victor has been involved in numerous coverups, 9/11 wasn't the first. Here is an extensive list of points debunking the PM piece on 9/11:

Pod:
Numerous engineering anaylsis were conducted by major researchers in the U.S. and abroad, on the photo of the plane hitting the south tower, and it was verified to not be a part of any 767.

Stand Down Orders:
Popular MEchanics need not try to debunk this anymore since the release of the norad tapes. It has now been proven that none of the jets were scrambled until after all the planes hit the ground and Cheney refusing to scramble.

FLight 175's WIndows:
This proves nothing. Of course a plane hit the tower. The wreckage shown in their picture does not confirm it was a commercial, in lieu of military jet either.

Intercepts not routine:
A flat out lie. Norad intercepted 67 planes between 9-2000 and 6-2001.

WTC Collapse:
Scores of firefighters, 911 operators, secretaries from nearby buildings, cable and local news reporters, audible video/audio captured from amateur video reported to hear multiple explosions going off. Home video showing on tripods tremble the video as the ground shakes minutes before the collapse.

Take a look at this photo and tell me it pancaked down (http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc1cons1.html). The 47 steel columns are several inches thick and over-engineered. For a pancake to happen, every single connection around the entire interior of the building would have to break simultaneously. Photos show some of the floors already had collapsed from the impact and were resting on the floor below them at an angle. Metal becomes a heat sink when subjected to high heat and anyone who has ever put together a Heathkit or soldered a circuit component knows the value of a good heat sink. Black smoke is indicative of an oxygen starved fire and most of the fuel burned up during impact. Only office furniture, carpet, paper, ceiing tile, etc were burining.

Puffs of Dust (squibs):
This is classic for almost all demolition. If pancacking were true, the windows would have blown out consistently all the way down from internal pressure, but did not. Metal girders are photographed blowing sideways and there is a 45 degree arc of debri all the way down followed by a pryoclastic flow of dust which follows all explosive demolitions.

Seismic Graph:
This varies depending on who you ask.

WTC7:
This building had two puny little fires in it near the top. Watch the video and view some photos. However, the building fell from the bottom up like every single demolition ever does - watch it. Additionally, Larry Silverstein, the WTC owner, admitted to "pulling" this building in a PBS interview. Additionally in another documentary, popular mechanics did a documentary on building demolitions and documented "pull" is a demolition term for a building demolition.

Liquid, molten steel was removed from below WTC7. The only way to get liquid, molten steel to do this is to subject it to heat over 5000 degrees. No plane hit this tower. Thermite does reach termperatures much higher than this. A thermal analysis 2 weeks after 9/11 still has ground zero extremely hot.

Big Plane, Small Hole - Pentagon:
Have you ever seen the video of an F-4 Phantom (historically strong, heavy jet) hitting a 5 floot thick, steel re-inforced concrete wall in an air force test video? It disintegrates into dust. No commercial jet, even with enough inertia can punch through 9.5 feet of steel reinforced concrete and even make any kind of a hole on the other end. Hey, the two planes that struck the WTC didn't even pop out on the other side and had far less to go through! Why won't the pentagon release video of the plane clearly hitting the pentagon? It obviously has it recorded. There are cameras documented everywhere around the building.

Intact windows at pentagon:
Blast proof is different than impact proof. Pre-collapse photos clearly show minimum damage to the surrounding area. THis is another "straw man" tactic.

Flight 77 debris:
This is not debatable since the release of the Official NTSB flight data recorder animation(American 77 Final Maneuver - Google Video) which has the plane well above the light poles before impact. Plane debris is shown on the ground in front of the Pentagon. It appears to be from a commercial airliner, how it got there is a mystery yet to be solved. Some times the best place to store stuff is right in front ahead of an event. No airliner could hit 7 light poles an continue to fly with any sort of wing.

Flight 93:
This plane left an 8 mile debris field and the engine was found over a mile (not 300 yards) from the crash site (shown by FOX news once).

F-16 Pilot:
Their word against ours.

Video of the Oklahoma City bombing has never been released. Our government has a history of imperialism and plans for war including the Northwoods documents, Gulf of Tonkin and Pearl Harbor, now proven to be a pretext for WWII for starters. I have two volumes of information printed out about what is going on in the gov and it is scary. The UN has recently presented a cultural diversity award to a foreign leader (Karimov in Uzbekestan) who actively boils people to death for torture and is good friends with Bush - numerous photos of them shaking hands and talking. I could spends days around the clock divluging information i have found and verified, but alas I have to leave it here.
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member
Conspiracy theories are not a new phenomenon.....


If the US is Imperialistic, it is the most benign form of imperialism the world has ever known!

There is a tremendous leap of faith required in order for one to see boogie men where there are none...I think there is a mindset and world view reliant upon the perception of the US as the horrible evil entity this POV encourages.
Self fulfillment on parade!

A much broader perspective of conspiracy theories is examined in this excellent essay..... (IMO)!

This Is Not Your Father's Conspiracy Theory

[FONT=times new roman,times]The operational execution and secrecy of the conspiratorial plotters required for an attack of this magnitude is beyond the realm of fiction. Such a conspiracy involving scores, perhaps hundreds of operatives has never been done without a single leak, defection, or early detection. In fact, the historical record of nearly every conspiracy, especially those carried out either by the State or by individuals working against the State has witnessed the uncovering of the plot, often by leaks, betrayal, change of heart among the plotters, and pure luck by those targeted for assassination and such. No actual conspiracy, from Guy Fawkes to Pearl Harbor (Japanese mini-sub was detected and sunk just shortly before the attack) to Watergate to even the 9/11 attacks has ever gone completely undetected or been so perfectly concealed that detection was impossible. It was the folly of men in the cases of Pearl Harbor and September 11, 2001 that allowed the attacks to occur. Had slightly more attention been given to reports of an enemy mini-sub being sunk by a US destroyer or of blips on the radar screen of an Army radar outpost just outside Pearl Harbor respectively, it is quite possible that USAAF and Naval aircraft could have intercepted the incoming first wave of Japanese aircraft that December morning. Had the FBI and CIA been allowed under the law to share intelligence, had more attention been given to reports of young Arab men taking flying lessons, it is possible that the 9/11 plotters could have been stopped. The point here is that a perfect conspiratorial operation is a near total impossibility. To believe that something as massive as a conspiracy to bring down enormous buildings, first by staging a passenger plane assault and then following that feat with a perfectly timed, controlled demolition of those same buildings, is to believe in the tooth fairy, trolls, and hobgoblins.
[/FONT]Summary excerpted from:
American Thinker: This Is Not Your Father's Conspiracy Theory
[FONT=times new roman,times]
[/FONT]
 

7xstall

Well-Known Member
that's a great article, Wavels. benign imperialism indeed! we must be the only imperialist nation in history to relinquish control of the countries we defeat back to the citizens of those countries.

i do agree that the amount of cynicism required to fully accept the conspiracy is astonishing. the melted steel, the collapse of 7, various other facts do leave me unsettled but as i do not understand structural mechanics well enough to fairly reason any of the claims myself i prefer to have the optimism of a child to the pessimism of a fool.

not only would this conspiracy require a large number of psychopaths, it would require a large number of very talented, intelligent and cooperative psychopaths working closely with very diverse groups of other psychopaths around the world. given that psychopaths are generally a very maladroit sort of people i have no qualms regarding the theories as nothing more than morbid entertainment and fantasy.
 
Top