ilove2sell
Active Member
I am in my seat and waiting for the next post....Wooooo
Buick, the higher amount of salts, minerals, etc in your solution, the more buffeting qualaties it has and the more resistant to ph swings it will be. That's why codger only needs to add a couple drops of acid to lower his ppm 0 RO water. I think that the precipitate on your hydroton is many things besides calcium. You must keep your nutes pretty low though huh? I'm planning to run about 1800 ppm of bloom during flower. That would lock the shit out of your plants. 900 ppm from the tap though? Jesus I would probably ro my drinking water at those levels.
Update: things are going quite well. Plants responded very well to nute PPMs in the range of 1100 ppm. At about 5 nodes now. Fidded two plants and started to LST another.
Biggest change is the addition of a humidifier. Read a very good article in the urban Gardner about relative humidity, vapor pressure and vapor pressure differential VPD. At increasing temps the ideal humidity jumps rapidly. The higher humidity avoids excess transpiration as plants don't generally like their stomata wide open under a hot light and fans. The end result is papery leafs and wasted energy on transpiration. This was counter intuative to me as I thought super transpiration would be ideal but apparantly it is not.
So at 85-88 degrees I have them at 80% RH. They look much happier...so I'm much happier.
Well I'm in a sealed room so not too worried about the mites. I don't know how dependant the mites are on humidity as I have seen horrendous, horror show style mites in rooms with 60-70% humidity. The molds and what not I'll just have to keep an eye out for. I'm using co2 so the high humidity is critical to keeping the stomata open in the high temps so co2 absorption can take place. I think I misquoted above cause I was posting and driving but the stomata close in the high heat and 50-60% Humidity to slow transpiration so the plants don't wilt. Noticed a little leaf margin curl up this morning which can happen from mg defeciency or high humididty. Have to look into that a little.
The article made ALLOT of sense to me, especially since I'm spending money to keep co2 at 1300 ppm
As promised, here are the pictures. This is week 3 for the plants, I lost about a week from starving them the first week.
Changed the nutrient solution yesterday to the following:
15 ml/ gallon Grow
5 ml/ gallon cal mag
7 ml/gallon liquid karma ( I may just cut this off as the hydro store guy said just save it for flower.
6 tbs of general hydro culture M (myco's)
A couple shots of the flood table. Then a few individual pictures showing : leaf curl from humidity drop, mega-branches from FIMing, and close ups of the blue widows that I can believe how dense they are right now.
View attachment 1240853View attachment 1240854View attachment 1240855View attachment 1240856View attachment 1240857View attachment 1240858View attachment 1240859View attachment 1240860
noboody else has any comments on the density of those plants? Are they too dense do you think?
noboody else has any comments on the density of those plants? Are they too dense do you think?