Geneticaly modified food

dtp5150

Well-Known Member
Why is it bad for cows to eat GMO crops? Isn't the drought/inflation all the more reason to want crops that grow under dry conditions? How does the company's legal policies reflect on the safety or morality of GMO technology? Is the ill health of America's population linked to consumption of GMO crops? These are the questions your statements are begging.
Heis: u are the biggest fucking moron on earth and I will explain why:
a: why is it good that cows eat gmo crops? This is a HUGE rationalization that would require perhaps 60 pages of propoganda. Please spare me your few-sentence synopsis.

b: ROUNDUP READ CORN = KILLS BEES, KILLS PLANTS THAT ARENT CREATED BY MONSANTO - AAre you a fucking idiot or have you no idea that the cattle industry is a prime factor in deforestation?! Also they are the prime eaters of GMO ( ROUNDUP READY) SOYBEAN AND CORN. Since when is dumping herbicides ( PLANET KILLING CHEMICALS) over thousands of acres of land good for the earth? Are you a human being? "World's nature 'becoming extinct at fastest rate on record', conservationists warn"


c: a companies/corporations legal policy has ZERO effect on the reflection of safety for the human species of the the planet.
Can you show me any legislation that says corporations must uphold the well being of biological species ( humans are one!) or mother earth? THATS WHY THE EPA WAS CREATED
 

Heisenberg

Well-Known Member
Heis: u are the biggest fucking moron on earth and I will explain why:
a: why is it good that cows eat gmo crops? This is a HUGE rationalization that would require perhaps 60 pages of propoganda. Please spare me your few-sentence synopsis.

b: ROUNDUP READ CORN = KILLS BEES, KILLS PLANTS THAT ARENT CREATED BY MONSANTO - AAre you a fucking idiot or have you no idea that the cattle industry is a prime factor in deforestation?! Also they are the prime eaters of GMO ( ROUNDUP READY) SOYBEAN AND CORN. Since when is dumping herbicides ( PLANET KILLING CHEMICALS) over thousands of acres of land good for the earth? Are you a human being? "World's nature 'becoming extinct at fastest rate on record', conservationists warn"


c: a companies/corporations legal policy has ZERO effect on the reflection of safety for the human species of the the planet.
Can you show me any legislation that says corporations must uphold the well being of biological species ( humans are one!) or mother earth? THATS WHY THE EPA WAS CREATED
I am just asking questions which should occur to anyone. I do not understand your position and I am asking you to explain it. So far you have failed. I am willing to believe GMO crops are bad, but so far have been presented with zero cons of the technology, only the practice. Instead of attempting to inform me, you insult me. When is that ever progressive? How much do you really care about this issue if you are willing to piss away a chance to explain yourself? Rather than offer any real information, you have simply regurgitated your prejudices. This is what we expect to see when a position is based on a flawed ideology rather than any sort of solid reality. The inability to answer even the simplest questions. The inability to engage in debate without being deceptive or abusive.

You have certainly made an excellent case that Monsanto is probably an evil corporation that shouldn't exist, but you have done nothing to justify your opposition to GMO technology. If we had a benevolent company that had only the best of intentions with GMO, didn't sue anyone, and wanted only to feed the world, would you still be against GMO? (hypothetical fantasy I know, but hypothetical questions are how we define principals) It's one thing to be anti-government or anti-corporation, but don't try to pass it off as science or compassion. It amounts to baseless alarmism designed to gain sympathy and support for your view.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
I am just asking questions which should occur to anyone. I do not understand your position and I am asking you to explain it. So far you have failed. I am willing to believe GMO crops are bad, but so far have been presented with zero cons of the technology, only the practice. Instead of attempting to inform me, you insult me. When is that ever progressive? How much do you really care about this issue if you are willing to piss away a chance to explain yourself? Rather than offer any real information, you have simply regurgitated your prejudices. This is what we expect to see when a position is based on a flawed ideology rather than any sort of solid reality. The inability to answer even the simplest questions. The inability to engage in debate without being deceptive or abusive.

You have certainly made an excellent case that Monsanto is probably an evil corporation that shouldn't exist, but you have done nothing to justify your opposition to GMO technology. If we had a benevolent company that had only the best of intentions with GMO, didn't sue anyone, and wanted only to feed the world, would you still be against GMO? (hypothetical fantasy I know, but hypothetical questions are how we define principals) It's one thing to be anti-government or anti-corporation, but don't try to pass it off as science or compassion. It amounts to baseless alarmism designed to gain sympathy and support for your view.
I think one of the most legitimate gripes with GMO crops is the use of the "terminator™" gene complex to prevent viable seed formation. If that complex escapes into non-GM crops of the same species, it provides a seriously unfair advantage to smallholders using more traditional seedstock. but that has to do with the politics of farming and does not present (imo) a clear and present danger either to the ecology or to what we eat. cn
 

dtp5150

Well-Known Member
"Sorry Heisenberg is a moderator/admin and you are not allowed to ignore him or her" haha wtf?

I am no longer allowed to ignore ignorance. Ahh internet, thank you for being invented. By internet I mean vbulletin of course.
 

Heisenberg

Well-Known Member
"Sorry Heisenberg is a moderator/admin and you are not allowed to ignore him or her" haha wtf?

I am no longer allowed to ignore ignorance. Ahh internet, thank you for being invented. By internet I mean vbulletin of course.
To ignore ignorance is to endorse it. I have repeatedly asked you to educate me by pointing me to valid information, and you give me half-baked fear mongering and insults. I have returned no insults to you, I have simply called it as I see it. Rather than defend the things you bring forth, you simply abuse and then ignore, proving you are exactly what you despise.
 

dtp5150

Well-Known Member
To ignore ignorance is to endorse it. I have repeatedly asked you to educate me by pointing me to valid information, and you give me half-baked fear mongering and insults. I have returned no insults to you, I have simply called it as I see it. Rather than defend the things you bring forth, you simply abuse and then ignore, proving you are exactly what you despise.
Since when is it my responsibility, liability, etc to educate people how they see fit for free? In fact, for NEGATIVE energy.

ignoring ignorance doesnt' endorce it, it is an attempt to GET RID OF IT.

DOES YOUR STUPID ASS EXPECT PHYSICS PROFESSORS TO TEACH MORONS ALGEBRA? AND BE FORCED TO READ ALL OF THEIR QUESTIONS? THEIR = RANDOM PEOPLE?!

THis is why I WANT TO IGNORE YOU BUT CANNOT DUE TO THE Bureaucracy that exists on a this website.
 

Heisenberg

Well-Known Member
Since when is it my responsibility, liability, etc to educate people how they see fit for free? In fact, for NEGATIVE energy.
Do you expect others to agree with you without understanding your position? Do you suppose you are entitled to provide information without being questioned about it? I asked you a simple question, why is it bad for cows to eat GMO crops, and your response was, why is it good? That does nothing to answer my question. You can't explain or justify your position in any way, so why do you bring it to the table? Is it somehow my fault that you don't have your facts straight and ready? Do you suppose calling people a moron and asking if they are human conveys any sort of useful information about the subject?

ignoring ignorance doesnt' endorce it, it is an attempt to GET RID OF IT.
So you think they way to get rid of ignorance is to ignore it? Out of sight, out of mind? You don't find education a better tool? What's really happening is that you are calling me ignorant without being able to explain why. I have admitted I could be ignorant and asked you to give me something besides bullshit to demonstrate it. You respond by putting your fingers in your ears.

DOES YOUR STUPID ASS EXPECT PHYSICS PROFESSORS TO TEACH MORONS ALGEBRA? AND BE FORCED TO READ ALL OF THEIR QUESTIONS? THEIR = RANDOM PEOPLE?!
So you are some sort of expert on the subject? That seems odd since you seem unable to articulate even one valid point. Interesting also that you are too good to offer useful information to others, but can still take the time to insult and belittle. What I expect is for you to conform to the same standards of reasoning and evidence that we use to judge any other claim. At the very least, I expect you to be able to clearly list the cons involved in genetically modifying a crop. You seem to be unable to demonstrate anything but arrogance. It seems that your only criteria for someone not being ignorant is they agree with you.

THis is why I WANT TO IGNORE YOU BUT CANNOT DUE TO THE Bureaucracy that exists on a this website.
Life is a bitch huh? I am not the only one you are going to hear this from. Anytime you want to have the comfort of opinion without going to the trouble of thought, you are going to get called out on it.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
this post is full of bullshit, mixed with some facts.

For one, show ANYTHING showing GE ice-minus bacteria being found in the stratosphere, ocean depths, and climatologists discussions.

Secondly, GM foods dont feed starving africans. Starving africans feed starving africans.

First they need clean water from wells ( they need basic drilling tools and materials and a pump, and techniques ) to water any potential crops. Then they need compost and knowledge of organic gardening, THEN THEY NEED SEEDS OF VEGETABLES, OF ANY KIND. If you think sending Roundup ready corn seed, ( and roundup herbicide - environment killer!! ) to africa is going to end starvation you're delusional.

point 1: genetically modified ice minus was found in ice cores, in high atmosphere samples and in rainfall worldwide within a few years of it's first tests. use the googles, or read the wikipedia page, i dont feel like going to the trouble of refuting your rude and ignorant statements, but here it is anyway.

http://books.google.com/books?id=MFcmHt9pG80C&printsec=frontcover&dq=New+developments+in+biotechnology&source=bl&ots=1zjWxsFae-&sig=yHD1HM9IFpRcN8-OttDhYJrztGY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=vbgZUKe1HqGriALP4IHIDg&ved=0CFsQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=New developments in biotechnology&f=false

point 2: after the EU refused to allow several varieties of gm corn wheat and rice into europe (despite being accepted as GRAS in the US)the distributors were stuck with it. they decided to donate a shitload of it to african nations like ethiopia and somalia who were (and still are) in a famine. the local "aid workers" from the red cross and several western relief agencies informed the leaders of said nations that the grain was poisonous, and the african nations refused this food which is eaten in the US regularly including by yourself.

http://worldpress.org/Africa/737.cfm

the lack of farming expertise and such in africa is irrelevant to the discussion at hand. way to be a cock-gobbler though.
 
Top