You need to get a dictionary, continued observation of a moving subject during one drawn out incident isn't stalking. If he had done it on multiple days/evenings, then you could lay that claim. I understand saying "stalking" makes you feel like your wild conclusions about GZ's intent are legitimate, but observing is observing.
The courts and authorities would disagree. And the fact he's still walking around.
You have shown me all I need to see about you and welcome to my ignore list.
You ignore everyone who disagrees with you you won't see any comments ever again.
I only have the village idiot on ignore.You ignore everyone who disagrees with you you won't see any comments ever again.
You can ignore yourself??
My guess is Zimmerman did more than stalk the kid. He probably showed his weapon after he confronted Martin
OJ Simson was found innocent as well
So OJ Simpson didn't kill 2 people?
Following someone is not "someone can chase someone down". Zimmerman had supposedly stopped following Martin when Martin doubled back and attacked Zimmerman. You twist the details to support your preconceived notion of "justice".
Idiotic metaphor that has nothing to do with the case at hand. You also have never experienced death
Substantial evidence exists that Martin was no innocent, regardless of how you try to falsely portray him.
Minority opinion? You think highly of a few fellow lib stoners on a forum. Minority...lol. He was found not guilty...Fact.Ah yes, the expected declared victory from the minority opinion.
Many of us recognize your grandiose delusions as an indication of mental instability.
