Gingrich Says Trump's No Longer Interested In 'Drain The Swamp'

BustinScales510

Well-Known Member
If the people who voted for him could read, this would piss them off.

Newt Gingrich said Wednesday that Donald Trump’s “drain the swamp” catch phrase was “cute” but that the President-elect now disclaims it.

During an interview with NPR’s “Morning Edition” Wednesday, host Rachel Martin asked if the former House speaker had been “working in the swamp, to use Donald Trump’s language.”


“I’m told he now just disclaims that. He now says it was cute, but he doesn't want to use it anymore,” Gingrich said, referring to the phrase. “I'd written what I thought was a very cute tweet about ‘the alligators are complaining,’ and somebody wrote back and said they were tired of hearing this stuff.”

Later, Gingrich added: “I personally, as a sense of humor, like the alligator and swamp language, and I think it vividly illustrates the problem, because all the people in this city who are the alligators are going to hate the swamp being drained. And there's going to be constant fighting over it. But, you know, he is my leader and if he decides to drop the swamp and the alligator I will drop the swamp and the alligator.”

On Monday, Gingrich drew scrutiny for asserting during an interview on “The Diane Rehm Show” that Trump would be able to simply pardon members of his family who broke anti-nepotism laws by working in his administration. Richard Painter, who was President George W. Bush’s chief White House ethics lawyer from 2005 to 2007, responded that “If the pardon power allows that, the pardon power allows the president to become a dictator.”

Martin asked Gingrich about the presidential pardon on Wednesday. Gingrich defended his comment by arguing that the Constitution “gives the president of the United States an extraordinarily wide grant of authority to use the power of the pardon. I'm not saying he should. I'm not saying he will."


http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/newt-gingrich-trump-not-using-drain-the-swamp
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
hey DEA informant,

you'd better hope whoever trump puts in charge of the IRS does not audit the ever loving shit out of you for keeping two sets of books.

LOL!

moron
At least searching his trailer won't take long, they could probably run it through one of those scanners that customs uses for scanning 40ft containers.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
If the people who voted for him could read, this would piss them off.

Newt Gingrich said Wednesday that Donald Trump’s “drain the swamp” catch phrase was “cute” but that the President-elect now disclaims it.

During an interview with NPR’s “Morning Edition” Wednesday, host Rachel Martin asked if the former House speaker had been “working in the swamp, to use Donald Trump’s language.”


“I’m told he now just disclaims that. He now says it was cute, but he doesn't want to use it anymore,” Gingrich said, referring to the phrase. “I'd written what I thought was a very cute tweet about ‘the alligators are complaining,’ and somebody wrote back and said they were tired of hearing this stuff.”

Later, Gingrich added: “I personally, as a sense of humor, like the alligator and swamp language, and I think it vividly illustrates the problem, because all the people in this city who are the alligators are going to hate the swamp being drained. And there's going to be constant fighting over it. But, you know, he is my leader and if he decides to drop the swamp and the alligator I will drop the swamp and the alligator.”

On Monday, Gingrich drew scrutiny for asserting during an interview on “The Diane Rehm Show” that Trump would be able to simply pardon members of his family who broke anti-nepotism laws by working in his administration. Richard Painter, who was President George W. Bush’s chief White House ethics lawyer from 2005 to 2007, responded that “If the pardon power allows that, the pardon power allows the president to become a dictator.”

Martin asked Gingrich about the presidential pardon on Wednesday. Gingrich defended his comment by arguing that the Constitution “gives the president of the United States an extraordinarily wide grant of authority to use the power of the pardon. I'm not saying he should. I'm not saying he will."


http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/newt-gingrich-trump-not-using-drain-the-swamp
It is funny that you mention people who can read then misunderstand the whole piece. Ironic actually. Rather amusing really...

Go back and re-read it yourself.

Trump is not going to continue to use the term 'Drain the swamp'. He will still drain the swamp, he just isnt going to use that rhetoric.

For those of you Barak Obama fans where it was all about what you say, not what you do this might be confusing.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
I mostly dont show ignored content but when I do...

I wonder what UB's fixation is with mostly naked fat white guys....
 

dandyrandy

Well-Known Member
In a frantic bit of cleanup on Tuesday, Donald Trump’s transition team downplayed what appeared to be a pay-for-play scheme surrounding the upcoming inauguration.

A spokesperson for the president-elect said that, contrary to reports, Trump’s two eldest sons were not offering access to their father during next month’s inauguration weekend in exchange for $1 million donations to conservation charities. The foundation that had cooked up the scheme (which included hunting and fishing expeditions) was just floating an “initial” concept of an idea, the spokesperson said. Beyond that, neither Eric Trump nor Donald Trump Jr. were “involved in any capacity,” nor was the president-elect “aware of the event or the details pertaining to it.’’
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
In a frantic bit of cleanup on Tuesday, Donald Trump’s transition team downplayed what appeared to be a pay-for-play scheme surrounding the upcoming inauguration.

A spokesperson for the president-elect said that, contrary to reports, Trump’s two eldest sons were not offering access to their father during next month’s inauguration weekend in exchange for $1 million donations to conservation charities. The foundation that had cooked up the scheme (which included hunting and fishing expeditions) was just floating an “initial” concept of an idea, the spokesperson said. Beyond that, neither Eric Trump nor Donald Trump Jr. were “involved in any capacity,” nor was the president-elect “aware of the event or the details pertaining to it.’’
Additionally, the Trump sons had no idea how they became Directors on a 501(c)(3).

Perhaps it was their signatures on corporate documents?

And it hasn't even begun..I must admit at least the Trumps aren't smart enough to try to hide it..ego's are too big.

Like Trumps win..he's not satisfied and it really bothers him that he didn't win popular vote which is why he still claims winner minus this or that..he HAS to justify it.

It's eating him up inside.
 

dandyrandy

Well-Known Member
Additionally, the Trump sons had no idea how they became Directors on a 501(c)(3).

Perhaps it was their signatures on corporate documents?

And it hasn't even begun..I must admit at least the Trumps aren't smart enough to try to hide it..ego's are too big.

Like Trumps win..he's not satisfied and it really bothers him that he didn't win popular vote which is why he still claims winner minus this or that..he HAS to justify it.

It's eating him up inside.
A lot of people I know who make north of $100k and are Republican believe all of this is good. They want the government run like a business. But they are young and have never had it tough. It will be interesting. Buckle up.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
A lot of people I know who make north of $100k and are Republican believe all of this is good. They want the government run like a business. But they are young and have never had it tough. It will be interesting. Buckle up.
You think people making north of $100K are in for a rough ride? Hmm....
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
100K is what 50K was back the late 80's. A couple making 200 - 300K each and working for wages are taxed to death.
That is fine but I am not sure how it relates to Daddyrandy and why he thinks it is going to get so tough for people in this category.
 

dandyrandy

Well-Known Member
100K is what 50K was back the late 80's. A couple making 200 - 300K each and working for wages are taxed to death.
And will continue to be. I make around $125k. My federal tax load I have no complaints about. But there is plenty of waste to go after. Say trumps personal costs are so expensive. I pay plenty of taxes. I have for over 50 years. I understand infrastructure costs too. I like my society to be safe and friendly. Usually people spend more money than they should. Maybe a Mercedes isn't worth it. My old Chevy truck I prefer. It's about life style. I can live on less than a grand a month. Yep no debt and low overhead. We grow most of our food. Everybody wants to be a big shot. It's overated.
 

god1

Well-Known Member
That is fine but I am not sure how it relates to Daddyrandy and why he thinks it is going to get so tough for people in this category.

Well the point is 100K for wages isn't a lot of money to begin with. If the Trumpster does start a trade war with the Chi-Coms the impact on the people in this pay grade will be noticable. It's not a linear effect.
 

god1

Well-Known Member
And will continue to be. I make around $125k. My federal tax load I have no complaints about. But there is plenty of waste to go after. Say trumps personal costs are so expensive. I pay plenty of taxes. I have for over 50 years. I understand infrastructure costs too. I like my society to be safe and friendly. Usually people spend more money than they should. Maybe a Mercedes isn't worth it. My old Chevy truck I prefer. It's about life style. I can live on less than a grand a month. Yep no debt and low overhead. We grow most of our food. Everybody wants to be a big shot. It's overated.

Well re spending money you appear to think like I do, I wish I could say the same about my wife.
 
Top