god patrical

dwcannan · Jul 16, 2012

did anyone else see that shit on the news about those scientists who finally found the god particle or whatever it was i think it was on cnn i saw like two minutes about it while i was on break anyways whats the big deal about it? i know they said they could unlock all the secrets of the universe with it

VICTORYGARDENSHYDRO · Jul 16, 2012

If they found the "god" particle, Who made the particle?

It's a vicious circle.

Doer · Jul 16, 2012

VICTORYGARDENSHYDRO said:
If they found the "god" particle, Who made the particle?

It's a vicious circle.

When you propose the Boss Father. Then everything has to be made. If you don't assume Diety then no one had to make anything. Why is the universe a Pie? Why does it have to be attributed to a Cook? I say Self has observed. That's it.

And I might add, it is up to you Not to be dupes of the Press. God particle? It's the gravity field they are after.

VICTORYGARDENSHYDRO · Jul 16, 2012

Doer said:
You propose the God Father. Then everything has to be made. If you don't assume Diety then no one had to make anything. Why is the universe a Pie? Why does it have to be attributed to a Cook? I say Self has observed. That's it.

And I might iadd, t is up to you not to be dupes of the Press. God particle? It's the gravity field they are after.

I'm actually an atheist and don't believe in "god", I know those who do would just throw that out there, Thus the second part of my statement.
science says this and the religious say otherwise. They always have an answer. therefore a vicious circle.

Justin00 · Jul 16, 2012

I have always found it odd how we put religion and science against each other as opposing forces, they work so well together, but we need something fight about right?

so often science is able to confirm religious occurrences that we previously had no way to explain, and had to accept by faith, then science give us an awesome explanation, and we see ahhhh, so that's how it works and look it even makes prefect since. Evolution is one great example.

Doer · Jul 16, 2012

Ah, yes. I see. My point is you are mixing in the Press with science. Science has never claimed they are against religion. But, this is how the Press keeps up the fight. It's high sarcasm this G-particle business. We don't have to play their game. Their game is reactionary altheism. Even Eienstein bought into it for awhile.

dwcannan · Jul 16, 2012

they are just calling it the god particle they are not saying oh we found the particle that made god

dwcannan · Jul 16, 2012

anyways you guys are getting off the point i was asking if anyone say the news report on it not about a huge debate about god

Justin00 · Jul 16, 2012

as far as the "god particle", i have not read much about the idea yet but i did read enough to see it is in no way related to religion.

as far as i can tell the GP, if you will, has a number of unique properties that they think may hold a number of the keys to why things in our universe behave and react the way they do. I think the pin name, GP, was given to the particle biased on the previously unexplainable effects manifested in experiments in quantum physics preformed at the particle accelerator in europe.

VICTORYGARDENSHYDRO · Jul 16, 2012

dwcannan said:
they are just calling it the god particle they are not saying oh we found the particle that made god

you missed what I was saying, I'm saying the "god" particle is suppose to be the thing that started everything, therefore kinda disproving the whole god thing. BUT, the religious will just say" who made the particle?'
get it now?

Justin00 · Jul 16, 2012

VICTORYGARDENSHYDRO said:
you missed what I was saying, I'm saying the "god" particle is suppose to be the thing that started everything, therefore kinda disproving the whole god thing. BUT, the religious will just say" who made the particle?'
get it now?

we know what your saying, and we are telling you that it is off topic. This is not a topic to discuss the religious and social significance of the GP, but rather what it is how it works and why its important.

or am i mistaken?

i can tell you that as of yet no one has made any claim that the newly discovered particle, labeled "the god particle", is in any way god, a creator of gods, or in any way religiously linked. See my earlier post for more info on the name choice for the particle.

dwcannan · Jul 16, 2012

yeah it was in the accelertor in europe shit maybe something good will come out of it like some crazy ass technology

VICTORYGARDENSHYDRO · Jul 16, 2012

Justin00 said:
we know what your saying, and we are telling you that it is off topic. This is not a topic to discuss the religious and social significance of the GP, but rather what it is how it works and why its important.

or am i mistaken?

i can tell you that as of yet no one has made any claim that the newly discovered particle, labeled "the god particle", is in any way god, a creator of gods, or in any way religiously linked. See my earlier post for more info on the name choice for the particle.

I'm discussing the GP, how is that "off topic"? It was not a big deal, because it didn't answer anything. It is still, what came first, the chicken or the egg? They can't even explain what they found.

ginjawarrior · Jul 16, 2012

Doer · Jul 16, 2012

Please. It's the Higgs bosun they are looking for. Higgs did the math quite awhile ago, and he is still alive. Like the Electromagnetic field, Higgs thinks there is a gravity field. And just like EM, if you excite the field enough, you can detect a particle. This theoretical H-field however, is very stable and would take an aweful lot of energy to excite it enough. They are looking for the spike in the data that suggests, indeed a particle was produced, however monentarially.

The Press always hopes that Science can put an end to religion. But, that's the Press war.

They found something. Likely a new boson. But, no proof of the Higgs field as yet.

ginjawarrior · Jul 16, 2012

cannabineer · Jul 16, 2012

Justin00 said:
I have always found it odd how we put religion and science against each other as opposing forces, they work so well together, but we need something fight about right?

so often science is able to confirm religious occurrences that we previously had no way to explain, and had to accept by faith, then science give us an awesome explanation, and we see ahhhh, so that's how it works and look it even makes prefect since. Evolution is one great example.

How is evolution a confirmation of a "religious occurrence"? I was under the impression that it's been a bone in the throat of Abrahamic religions from day one. The doctrinal opposition was epic. I see the less-militant branches of the three Abrahamic religions in grudging armistice with the evolutionists and not in open embrace.

This discourages me from asking other examples. cn

jessy koons · Jul 16, 2012

The problem with this latest discovery of the Higgs Boson is that it is a clone only 'god particle'.

Seeds for this particular particle will be much harder to find.

cannabineer · Jul 16, 2012

jessy koons said:
The problem with this latest discovery of the Higgs Boson is that it is a clone only 'god particle'.

Seeds for this particular particle will be much harder to find.

You can cross it with Critical Mass, but you'll need a GeV HID. cn

gioua · Jul 16, 2012

Spoke to God last night... we chatted about this particle... or patrical... states he is glad they found his particle but he states it was not lost in the first place.

god patrical

Active Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Active Member

Active Member

New Member

Active Member

Active Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Ursus marijanus

New Member

Ursus marijanus

Well-Known Member

Similar threads