Hillary busted agan by Weiner's hacked phone

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
You appear to have reached the limit of your debating skills... Maybe another forum where you could draw with crayon would be more appropriate...
 

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
You seem to be overly fixated on gay sex. The only person you are likely annoying is the mod who continuously has to take your pictures down.

Some people on this site are immune to irritating mods like Uncle Buck. Are you another bucky puppet? He is pretty creepy with 4-5 already running at any given time.
You probably shouldn't refer to others as 'pretty creepy'
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
You seem to be overly fixated on gay sex. The only person you are likely annoying is the mod who continuously has to take your pictures down.
Some people on this site are immune to irritating mods like Uncle Buck. Are you another bucky puppet? He is pretty creepy with 4-5 already running at any given time.
"If the Buckold wants ducks in the hand, then by god the Buckold will post pictures of ducks in the hand." :D
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
Perhaps my favorite quote from "sources":

"The F.B.I. is investigating illicit text messages that Mr. Weiner, a former Democratic congressman from New York, sent to a 15-year-old girl in North Carolina. The bureau told Congress on Friday that it had uncovered new emails related to the Clinton case — one federal official said they numbered in the tens of thousands"
 

squarepush3r

Well-Known Member
Social Media Blackout? FBI Emails Are Not 'Trending' On Twitter, Facebook, Buzzfeed, Or Snapchat

by Tyler Durden
Oct 29, 2016 9:30 PM

They are not known as 'weapons of mass distraction' for nothing...





In the 24 hours since FBI Director Comey dropped perhaps the biggest bombshell of the entire Presidential campaign, sending Democrats (and media) scrambling headless-chicken-like for answers (and blame-scaping), does anyone else find it odd that 'FBI Emails' does not appear to be a hot topic, trending, big deal on any social media?

Snapchat..."Hot"


h/t @CharlieKrik11



Facebook... "Trending"


h/t @MichaelDuncan



Twitter..."Top Moments"


h/t @kierobar



Buzzfeed... "Trending Now"


* * *

As Liberty Blitzkrieg's Mike Krieger recently asked (and answered), why are these things happening in the first place?

Apple claims not to endorse candidates, but their actions suggest otherwise, and some of their executives - including CEO Tim Cook - actively support Clinton’s campaign. Buzzfeed recently obtained an invitation to a private $50,000-per-plate fundraiser Cook is hosting for Clinton with his Apple colleague, Lisa Jackson, at the end of this month.



Apple isn’t the only corporation doing Clinton’s bidding. Wikileaks founder Julian Assange said Clinton made a deal with Google and that the tech giant is “directly engaged” in her campaign. It’s been widely reported Clinton hired Eric Schmidt—chairman of Alphabet, the parent company of Google—to set up a tech company called The Groundwork. Assange claims this was to ensure Clinton had the “engineering talent to win the election.” He also pointed out that many members of Clinton’s staff have worked for Google, and some of her former employees now work at Google.

Of course, I covered Groundwork earlier this year. See: Meet “Groundwork” – Google Chairman Eric Schmidt’s Stealth Startup Working to Make Hillary Clinton President

Twitter is another culprit. The company has gotten a lot of slack for banning conservatives and Trump supporters such as Breitbart’s Milo Yiannopoulos and, most recently, rapper Azealia Banks after she came out in support of Trump. Twitter has provided vague answers as to why conservative voices have been banned while they’ve allowed other users to call for the killing of cops.



Just yesterday, Buzzfeed revealed that the social media giant’s top executive personally protected the President from seeing critical messages last year. “In 2015, then-Twitter CEO Dick Costolo secretly ordered employees to filter out abusive and hateful replies to President Barack Obama.”



The founders of some of the most popular pro-Trump Twitter handles - including @USAforTrump2016 and @WeNeedTrump—insist Twitter is censoring their content. They’ve pointed out that Twitter changes trending hashtags associated with negative tweets about Clinton (which has been reported before). On August 4, shortly after the hashtag “HillaryAccomplishment” began trending, it was taken over by anti-Clinton users, who used it to mention Benghazi or Emailgate. Eric Spracklen, @USAforTrump2016 founder, noticed the hashtag was quickly changed—pluralized to #HillarysAccomplishments.

Many people have pointed out the exact shenanigans described above for other Clinton-related hashtags. In fact, it’s been my self-described progressive friends who have been most up in arms about it

“They take away the hashtag that has negative tweets for Clinton and replace it with something that doesn’t so the average person doesn’t see what was really trending,” Spracklen said. “This happens every day.”



This new strand, where one cannot even search for alternative viewpoints amid technology companies who stand to benefit from the free-trade policies and eased immigration regulations of a Clinton presidence, represents a dangerous sea change. There’s absolutely no question the digital forums we use every day are censoring conservatives and favoring Clinton. You can’t simply scroll through photos on Instagram, look for a video game in the App Store or do a quick Google search without being fed anti-Trump and pro-Clinton propaganda.

Personally, I’ve definitely noticed a big-time pro-Clinton bias in my Twitter stream on a daily basis, and I don’t follow people/organizations that would define themselves as overtly pro-Clinton. That’s my honest perception, and I don’t have a dog in this fight.
 

StillNotGOP

Well-Known Member
Executives who run social media sites are liberal Hillary donars. 99% of the money donated from the Silicon Valley goes to Democrats. They decide with Hillary's approval what is trending, and also what is not.

If your name was Mark Zuckerface and wanted to outsource thousands of American jobs via H-1B visas, who would you vote for? Hillary or Trump
 

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
Executives who run social media sites are liberal Hillary donars. 99% of the money donated from the Silicon Valley goes to Democrats. They decide with Hillary's approval what is trending, and also what is not.

If your name was Mark Zuckerface and wanted to outsource thousands of American jobs via H-1B visas, who would you vote for? Hillary or Trump

Trump, because he has the most experience with hiring immigrants and illegals
 

StillNotGOP

Well-Known Member
Trump, because he has the most experience with hiring immigrants and illegals
You would think so. Except he has a lot more experience hiring Americans. Far more than Hillary. She doesn't know how to create jobs or run a business. She is completely ignorant to the fact American steel is almost impossable to find due to EPA regulations. Pittsburgh got shut down, so of course people buy their steel from China. Where else are they supposed to get it from?
 
Last edited:

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
You would think so. Except he also has the most experience hiring Americans. Far more than Hillary. She doesn't know how to create jobs or run a business. She is completely ignorant to the fact American steel is almost impossable to find due to EPA regulations. Pittsburgh got shut down, so of course people buy their steel from China. Where else are they supposed to get it from?

Screenshot_20161030-063816.png
 

StillNotGOP

Well-Known Member
Way cheaper and faster to buy from China. Trump finishes projects under budget, ahead of schedule, and above expectations. It's the exact opposite of how Hillary and the rest of Washington gets things done.

When Trump gets in office, US steel production will be able to compete with foreign import prices.

-1x-1.png
 

sixstring2112

Well-Known Member
I still lol every time I read this thread title because it was the weiner that took down the shill and she dont even like dicks lmao.anyone have a pic of bill and shill kissing in the last 2 or 3 years? All i see is fake hugs
 

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
I still lol every time I read this thread title because it was the weiner that took down the shill and she dont even like dicks lmao.anyone have a pic of bill and shill kissing in the last 2 or 3 years? All i see is fake hugs

I laugh every time I see your avi lol, I remember my first plant too!
 

StillNotGOP

Well-Known Member
Not hard when you don't pay contractors
It's hard to not pay contractors. It's a huge black eye. When contractors don't get paid, they stop working with you, and sue your business. Forced to declare bankruptcy, and then your companies assets gets seized. It's a huge mess. Smart people get out of a bad deal early, before losing everything. Did you know most of the building Trump does is Union labor? I thought Democrats loved the union's...
 

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
It's hard to not pay contractors. It's a huge black eye. When contractors don't get paid, they stop working with you, and sue your business. Forced to declare bankruptcy, and then your companies assets gets seized. It's a huge mess. Smart people get out of a bad deal early, before losing everything. Did you know most of the building Trump does is Union labor? I thought Democrats loved the union's...

No it's not ask your daddy
 
Top