hillary crushing rend pawl in the polls so far

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member


does this make you sad?

is this why the tea party is so angry?

is this why the white nationalists who plague our forum are so completely despondent?

cheer up, white nationalists. this toaster can cook an egg.

 

tightpockt

Well-Known Member
Honestly, I just can't bear the thought of another Clinton or Bush or (insert career politician here)....I wish someone like Corey Booker would run. I like to think that Obama really did want to 'change' the way business was done in washington but he came to realize that it's impossible. That's depressing and disheartening at the same time. Hillary is just as scummy as the rest of them.
Ugh...I can feel a whole fucking rant coming on now! It's just building inside me the minute I started writing this post.
All of these disjointed thoughts are rushing in 'cause I just smoked.
 

NewtoMJ

Well-Known Member


does this make you sad?

is this why the tea party is so angry?

is this why the white nationalists who plague our forum are so completely despondent?

cheer up, white nationalists. this toaster can cook an egg.

The chart doesn't portray a lot of information, simply because the sample sizes are too small. Also, if we take into account that Paul has a lot less time on the national stage in comparison to Clinton; I believe it's safe to say those numbers do not bode well for Mrs Clinton. I'm not a supporter of either btw, just a bipartisan observation.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The chart doesn't portray a lot of information, simply because the sample sizes are too small. Also, if we take into account that Paul has a lot less time on the national stage in comparison to Clinton; I believe it's safe to say those numbers do not bode well for Mrs Clinton. I'm not a supporter of either btw, just a bipartisan observation.
sure, just a bipartisan observation. i bet.

if you knew the first damn thing about statistics, you would know what a sufficient sample size is and would not have opened your mouth to remove all doubt.

also, the more rend pawl speaks, the more people won't vote for him. in case you hadn't heard, the GOP diagnosed "too many debates" as one of the official reasons why they lost.

the more any GOP candidate talks, the less people will vote for him. that's according to the GOP itself.
 

panhead

Well-Known Member
I don't see where all the hate towards President Bill Clinton comes from except hard nailed rep vs dem issues .

For the 8 yrs wild Bill was prez did you guys not make a great living ? Wasn't there work available for most who wanted work ?
Was there not lotsa opportunities for advancement in your field ?

Everybody I know made the best income of there careers during those 8 yrs & had job stability unmatched before & after , we all made a fortune & had lotsa work , wtf more can we ask for .

I hope like hell Hillary wins the big show , she'll have the best advisor available & maybe between the 2 of em they can get some shit done .
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rand Paul knows he does not have a chance in hell in winning the GOP primary. You notice he won't give up his senate seat to go all in.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Recommended sample sizes for something like this is around 350 people if you want a 95% confidence level.

Sample sizes look more than adequate.

BTW for those that don't know, 1000LV means sample size of 1,000 Likely Voters
RV = Registered Voters and A= all Adults.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Recommended sample sizes for something like this is around 350 people if you want a 95% confidence level.

Sample sizes look more than adequate.

BTW for those that don't know, 1000LV means sample size of 1,000 Likely Voters
RV = Registered Voters and A= all Adults.
so helpful.
 
Top