if two threads count as spam, then what are you saying about your dozen and a half threads focusing on your fear and hatred of little brown children?
You know most of those drugs are also used in DCD operations after a miscarriage too, right?Teva: they make plan B, paragard, IUDs, and actavis (generic version of plan B).
Pfizer: they make cyotec and prostin E2, abortion inducers. (LOL)
Bayer: they make skyla and mirena (hormonal IUDs)
AstraZeneca: they make prostodin and cerviprime (drugs used in abortions)
Forest laboratories: they make cervidil, an abortion inducer (LOL)
but hobby lobby won't cover THESE EXACT SAME birth control methods for their employees, because some of them may cause a fertilized egg not to implant, which they consider to be abortion (note: even mississippi has overwhelmingly rejected this definition of personhood that they subscribe to).
apparently, hobby lobby has no problem making money on abortion, but they refuse to spend money on anything that might even cause an abortion by the most extremist standards.
let's await for our board's self-proclaimed "atheists" to celebrate this bit of hypocrisy.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1099360-savings-incentive-and-profit-sharing-plan-for.html
Teva: they make plan B, paragard, IUDs, and actavis (generic version of plan B).
Pfizer: they make cyotec and prostin E2, abortion inducers. (LOL)
Bayer: they make skyla and mirena (hormonal IUDs)
AstraZeneca: they make prostodin and cerviprime (drugs used in abortions)
Forest laboratories: they make cervidil, an abortion inducer (LOL)
but hobby lobby won't cover THESE EXACT SAME birth control methods for their employees, because some of them may cause a fertilized egg not to implant, which they consider to be abortion (note: even mississippi has overwhelmingly rejected this definition of personhood that they subscribe to).
apparently, hobby lobby has no problem making money on abortion, but they refuse to spend money on anything that might even cause an abortion by the most extremist standards.
let's await for our board's self-proclaimed "atheists" to celebrate this bit of hypocrisy.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1099360-savings-incentive-and-profit-sharing-plan-for.html
you can't put employer match into the check..there are rules and it's against the law.
the section 125 is an employer cost to administrate for employees in order to pre-tax benefits for employees and can only exist in certain circumstances..it's been my experience that of all the Sec125 I've sold, no employer would ever to do this in order to reduce the tax burden and bring home more money for the employee..rather i would have to do the math for them to show ROI on that the $480 investment..if the employer didn't benefit they wouldn't do it.
as far as MOST (not all) employers are concerned..it's all for the good of the employers company and not the most valuable resource: the employee.
Employees can be useful, and the ones that are useful are worth clinging too.
you can't put employer match into the check..there are rules and it's against the law.
the section 125 is an employer cost to administrate for employees in order to pre-tax benefits for employees and can only exist in certain circumstances..it's been my experience that of all the Sec125 I've sold, no employer would ever to do this in order to reduce the tax burden and bring home more money for the employee..rather i would have to do the math for them to show ROI on that the $480 (annual) investment..if the employer didn't benefit they wouldn't do it.
as far as MOST (not all) employers are concerned..it's all for the good of the employers company and not the most valuable resource: the employee.
Why is the employee the most valuable resource to a company? If that were actually true then companies would be scrambling all over themselves to hire more people all the time due to this so called value that an employee brings. An employee brings value to a company when he produces more value than he is paid for, end of story.