The way I see it is, unless you are on some kind of government assistance, or you make over $200k per year, you won't be directly affected. You claim that IF the revenue went to paying down the debt, but do you think it will?unless the people here are in the "upper income earners" they can't comment on how it would effect them personally unless you specify how it would affect them
if it went into boosting the economy or "shovel rdy jobs" (or any equivalent) then as a whole everyone will benefit as economy raises
if it purely went into paying back debt then everyone is in exactly same boat they are in now
dont forget as economy raises so does your ability to pay back said debt
I agree, I guess we'd have to get some clarification from president Obama on that, but it hasn't stopped most on the left from advocating it, has it?A raise in income taxes would probably not affect me very much.
But i am curious as to which taxes would be raised how much, and with what destination in the Federal budget? There is too much unsaid here imo. cn
If you raise my taxes, I can pay for more people to collect welfare and food stamps while they drive Cadillac Escalades and wear $200 Air Jordans, it may even go towards financing another government failure like Solydra!If you raise my taxes i will have no choice but to tighten my belt.
The car elevator wont be built, my wife will not buy a 3rd Cadillac, i will move more of my $ to offshore accounts......
Our federal government wastes billions of dollars a year on redundant bureaucracies ans fraudulent entitlements, this has been argued for many years, why is there no solution, why should my or anyone's tax dollars go towards fraud and waste the government refuses to fix?Thats odd, my wife and I know some people that are on govt. assistance. About 1/2 of them dont have a car at all, the ones that do drive a shitbox.
Same thing with sneakers and clothes. Youre reffering to the ones that are abusing the system.
Do you think its fair that a millionaire pays a lower tax rate than you or i do?
As far as Solyndra goes, yes it was an utter failure. That being said id rather see my tax $ go towards developing renewable energy than subsidies to the most profitable corporations on earth that sell a finite product
beenthere bought into the mythical welfare queen douchebaggery race baiting of the reagan years.Thats odd, my wife and I know some people that are on govt. assistance. About 1/2 of them dont have a car at all, the ones that do drive a shitbox.
Same thing with sneakers and clothes. Youre reffering to the ones that are abusing the system.
Do you think its fair that a millionaire pays a lower tax rate than you or i do?
As far as Solyndra goes, yes it was an utter failure. That being said id rather see my tax $ go towards developing renewable energy than subsidies to the most profitable corporations on earth that sell a finite product
I take it you meant more than Mitt Romney paid. If that's the case, your schedule C should have been around $170,000+ That income puts you between the top 5-10%, right about the same marginal tax bracket as me."people like you", exactly what am i?
I just sold a business and started a new one. I know the tax rate i paid/pay and it sure as hell is lower than what Mitt paid. Thats not specualtion or a talking point, its a fact.
If were gonna tackle govt. waste im all for it. Lets start w/ subsidies for huge corporations, cutting defense before we take from the needy
Bucky, you don't even know your own tax rates, leave the debate to the grown ups please.beenthere bought into the mythical welfare queen douchebaggery race baiting of the reagan years.
speaks highly of his intelligence (lack thereof).
yeah, what do i know. posting proof and all.Bucky, you don't even know your own tax rates, leave the debate to the grown ups please.
It was bad, I know your trying to derail, but anyone want do so a search on housing authorities and assisted living wont see nice little communities its pretty bad shit.i love how conservatives' main tactic is to make us scurred of the dark people.
if only we could get rid of them somehow, problem solved! america prospers under a david duke presidency.
ya mean to imply that there is some type of correlation between crime and low SES?It was bad, I know your trying to derail, but anyone want do so a search on housing authorities and assisted living wont see nice little communities its pretty bad shit.
I dont need to research public housing i lived in the projects as a young kid.It was bad, I know your trying to derail, but anyone want do so a search on housing authorities and assisted living wont see nice little communities its pretty bad shit.
Bucky, you don't even know your own tax rates, leave the debate to the grown ups please.
yeah, what do i know. posting proof and all.
douche.
You can tell me but as I said this isn't the problem, it that our government is not competent enough to make common sense regulations. I figure this tax hike will only hurt the the people that follow the rules to begin with, Our tax code is a mammoth and it changes on a yearly basis. Most experts say thing really wont help much, and I tend to agree. I kinda feel stupid arguing that the government needs more money, regardless where it comes from when they are so reckless. Its like letting a crack head handle your finances.I dont need to research public housing i lived in the projects as a young kid.
Guess how my family escaped that poverty?