"I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation" -Ben Carson

pnwmystery · Sep 25, 2015

[

bluntmassa1 said:
I don't hate Jews I like them Orthodox Jews they tried to protest their children being forced to join the military didn't work of course the dirty pig Jews beat the shit out of all the protestors it was brutal clubbing the shit out of them. I don't like Netanyahoo so of course some Jews I don't like but it's impossible to like every black or brown person just look at Carson nobody likes him he is the dumbest brain surgeon in the world he should go back to his job plenty in need of brain surgery like you.

And no you should not be worried about terrorists you have more to fear of lightning killing you than a terrorist killing you....

The way you spelled Netanyahu made me laugh, never thought of it - super really clever! :mrgreen:

And btw it's Not GOP's standard GOP tactic: Don't agree with someone? Insult them!

Not GOP · Sep 25, 2015

pnwmystery said:
[

The way you spelled Netanyahu made me laugh, never thought of it - super really clever!

And btw it's Not GOP's standard GOP tactic: Don't agree with someone? Insult them!

I've never insulted you. What are you crying about?

pnwmystery · Sep 25, 2015

Not GOP said:
I've never insulted you. What are you crying about?

Did I ever say you insulted me? No... you sure are taking a lot of the things I say very personally. However, I guess I stand corrected: Throw out ad hominem attacks.

Not GOP · Sep 25, 2015

pnwmystery said:
Did I ever say you insulted me? No... you sure are taking a lot of the things I say very personally. However, I guess I stand corrected: Throw out ad hominem attacks.

Whatever. I still don't know why you brought my name up, or what the hell you're talking about

pnwmystery · Sep 25, 2015

Not GOP said:
Whatever. I still don't know why you brought my name up, or what the hell you're talking about

An ad hominem attack is an argument directed at a person (ad hominem, Latin for 'to the person') rather than a position. "So you hate Jews," "You must be a Communist."

Not GOP · Sep 25, 2015

pnwmystery said:
An ad hominem attack is an argument directed at a person (ad hominem, Latin for 'to the person') rather than a position. "So you hate Jews," "You must be a Communist."

Honestly. when I think of somebody who hates Jewish people, the first thing that comes to mind is Islamists.
Sorry if thats not politically correct, but it's true.

pnwmystery · Sep 25, 2015

Not GOP said:
Honestly. when I think of somebody who hates Jewish people, the first thing that comes to mind is Islamists.
Sorry if thats not politically correct, but it's true.

That's your opinion and it's not completely baseless. I usually think Christians since we've had the longest history of Jewish persecution.

Darth Vapour · Sep 25, 2015

Truth is doesn't matter who you put in charge your all fucked anyways

Not GOP · Sep 25, 2015

Darth Vapour said:
Truth is doesn't matter who you put in charge your all fucked anyways

That's OK because we're going to build a wall. It's going to be a beautiful wall. The most magnificent wall this world has ever seen.

Flaming Pie · Sep 25, 2015

Not GOP said:
That's OK because we're going to build a wall. It's going to be a beautiful wall. The most magnificent wall this world has ever seen.

???

Not GOP · Sep 25, 2015

Flaming Pie said:
???

sorry. sometimes I joke around and it flies over people's heads. I just wasn't in the mood for the serious, we're doomed, it's Armageddon for America conversation.

Rob Roy · Sep 25, 2015

god1 said:
Root cause; Human behavior is a Gaussian distribution; you will eventually have to deal with the irresponsible "fuck ups" that walk among us.

Absolutely. Is the system perfect, no; can it be improved, yes. The question should be, "why do we need it"? Answer, see "Root cause".

http://strike-the-root.com/how-anarchy-works-security-without-state

You might be interested in reading this article, it was published at a website called "Strike the Root" . Peace.

Rob Roy · Sep 25, 2015

Darth Vapour said:
Truth is doesn't matter who you put in charge your all fucked anyways

That's why individuals should be in charge of their own lives.

People that think they can run others lives using force are universally seen as criminals....unless they do it through government, then the sheep somehow think that's okay and annoint the criminal a "leader". Bad sheep! Very bad sheep!

Flaming Pie · Sep 25, 2015

Rob Roy said:
That's why individuals should be in charge of their own lives.

People that think they can run others lives using force are universally seen as criminals....unless they do it through government, then the sheep somehow think that's okay and annoint the criminal a "leader". Bad sheep! Very bad sheep!

Even animals have heirarchy and leaders telling them what they can and cannot do.

It is also human nature to create rules and boundries. The more people agree with a set of rules the more peace there is.

Except for people like you who would rather governments be confined to tribalistic definitions.

Rob Roy · Sep 25, 2015

Flaming Pie said:
Even animals have heirarchy and leaders telling them what they can and cannot do.

It is also human nature to create rules and boundries. The more people agree with a set of rules the more peace there is.

Except for people like you who would rather governments be confined to tribalistic definitions.

Isn't the first rule that we shouldn't automatically assume authority over people if they are leaving us alone?

Government to abide by that rule could not arise from a forced and involuntary relationship with the individual, it is logically impossible.

Also, I'm not sure you have a very good understanding of my point of view and have filled in the blanks erroneously.

Padawanbater2 · Sep 25, 2015

Rob Roy said:
Isn't the first rule that we shouldn't automatically assume authority over people if they are leaving us alone?

Government to abide by that rule could not arise from a forced and involuntary relationship with the individual, it is logically impossible.

Also, I'm not sure you have a very good understanding of my point of view and have filled in the blanks erroneously.

What is your opinion of Rousseau's explanation of the social contract?

Rob Roy · Sep 25, 2015

Padawanbater2 said:
What is your opinion of Rousseau's explanation of the social contract?

It is a rationalization to use "tacit consent" as actual consent.

Actual consent OF the individual must come FROM the individual. If it doesn't logic is being abused.

Padawanbater2 · Sep 25, 2015

Rob Roy said:
It is a rationalization to use "tacit consent" as actual consent.

Actual consent OF the individual must come FROM the individual. If it doesn't logic is being abused.

Society can't function successfully the way you suggest

Rob Roy · Sep 25, 2015

Padawanbater2 said:
Society can't function successfully the way you suggest

I suggest the basis of human interaction should default to consensual interactions. Do you suggest they should default to something else?

Padawanbater2 · Sep 25, 2015

Rob Roy said:
I suggest the basis of human interaction should default to consensual interactions. Do you suggest they should default to something else?

I believe human interaction is consensual, and by living inside a society you have to give up certain "rights", like your "right" to kill somebody, in order to guarantee citizens safety.

"I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation" -Ben Carson

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Similar threads