In House Genetics Thread

BigLittlejohn

BigLittlejohn

Well-Known Member
KKK has yet to be labeled a terror group even though they have documented history of burning black bodies as late as the 1990s. The video bring circulated supposedly showing 2 black dudes beating a white dude was not even in Charlotte but London England. But people are running with that shit as fact while defending the police and telling us to wait for facts. The height of hypocritical irony.
 
akhiymjames

akhiymjames

Well-Known Member
I don't condone the tearing up of the city because some one died unjustly but you are a fool to believe EVERYTHING the police and the media are saying is the 100% truth. Believe what you want but some more facts will come out. I told y'all more facts will come out

@Amos Otis please go watch the video from his wife she sold it to New York Times its on the home page. There ain't no gun by his feet like they supposedly show in pics

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/24/us/charlotte-keith-scott-shooting-video.html?_r=0

Amos you getting away from the point. Nobody is devaluing anybody situation it's bad that lady lost her business and many business are ruined but that doesn't represent all of black people. They are ignorant uneducated black people who are enraged by what is going on and don't know how to voice their frustrations. The system doesn't work and they don't know what to do but this does not represent all blacks
 
Vato_504

Vato_504

Well-Known Member
All I'm going to say is this and hopefully we can let this ride. A man was killed and his kid had to get off a school bus to see their father dead on the ground for nothing. It don't matter if it was a blk cop, white cop, or purple cop it was a fucking cop. This shit isn't just happening to blk people. It's people that live in poor neighborhoods. The have all races in poor neighborhoods. That's the people who's feeling it the most. I'm 37 we won't see a change in our lifetime.


One more thing. Think about this for a minute. Congress got involved with every major sport to rid them of steroids fucking steroids. But we don't hear shit from them on these senseless killing of innocent people by law enforcement. The world we live in.. Bless up fellas stay safe and get them before the get you....
 
greencropper

greencropper

Well-Known Member
Beemo said:
what i dont understand is, why cant they go for a shoulder or a leg shot?? they're always less than 5ft away...
you cant miss from that distance. if you do, you shouldnt have a gun....
Click to expand...
i think that is one of the greatest police mysteries around the world...they always go for the kill shot...even if dude has 5-10 cops facing him very close range and he is armed with broken bottle...never easily shoot the legs out...just kill shots, really looks like lots of cops just itching for any excuse to shoot people dead? theres gotta be police otherwise total mayhem but the fuzz has got a long way to go before they will be respected in any shape or form, 1st thing is to clear their ranks of the murdering psycho's, more stringent personality tests & requirements, abuse of power is their greatest hallmark at present
 
Last edited:
Amos Otis

Amos Otis

Well-Known Member
akhiymjames said:
I don't condone the tearing up of the city because some one died unjustly.
Click to expand...
Then we are more in agreement than you realize. I posted a lengthy mail this morning. Did you read it? If you did, you know exactly where I stand on riots vs "peaceful protests". I'd like to know what points you disagreed with.

akhiymjames said:
but you are a fool to believe EVERYTHING the police and the media are saying is the 100% truth
Click to expand...
I know you are a good man, my friend. And I honestly don't believe you take me for a fool, nor me you. I never said I buy 100% of the narritive from EITHER side. Not even close.

Did you watch the Pastor Byrd video? If you did, you'd know even more exactly where I;m coming from. If you didn't, why not? How 'bout you, @BigLittlejohn ? We're all friends before this discussion - are we now?

I agree 1000% with this man below. This is the basis for all my opinions. You wanna know? - then watch it, and tell me where you disagree. You don't wanna know? Then I guess we weren't the friends I believed us to be. Not the first time........

 
Last edited:
Amos Otis

Amos Otis

Well-Known Member
BigLittlejohn said:
I still value a human life over her property. One is replaceable the other is not.
.
Click to expand...
So....you're justifying ruining innocent lives on behalf of protesting innocent lives ruined? :shock: You believe these struggling business owners can just shuffle the deck and be back in business? Hey, I know.......let's burn your house, and all your insured possessions, you call your insurance rep, then let us know how replaceable your situation really is.

BigLittlejohn said:
All I want from police is to leave me the fuck alone. I won't call them for help.
Click to expand...
I don't believe that for a second. No offense.
 
Odin*

Odin*

Well-Known Member
greencropper said:
i think that is one of the greatest police mysteries around the world...they always go for the kill shot...even if dude has 5-10 cops facing him very close range and he is armed with broken bottle...never easily shoot the legs out...just kill shots, really looks like lots of cops just itching for any excuse to shoot people dead? theres gotta be police otherwise total mayhem but the fuzz has got a long way to go before they will be respected in any shape or form, 1st thing is to clear their ranks of the murdering psycho's, more stringent personality tests & requirements, abuse of power is their greatest hallmark at present
Click to expand...
They're trained to use their gun with lethal intent in situations where their lives, or those of civilians, are in danger. Failure to "end" the threat in such a situation could prove fatal to the officers or bystanders.

The abuse of power is the issue (as you suggested), "tests" can't really "weed out" the idiots. No one is going to admit that they have deep rooted psychological issues/inferiority complexes during a psych eval. We know this all too well, it's a ubiquitous trope; those who seek power/authority over others are, in general, the least deserving. There are some good cops, just men doing their job, the others, not so much.

Give power/authority (and a gun) to people less than righteous and constantly expose them to people that have severe issues with authority (especially authority granted by a badge and a gun). It's a recipe for disaster.
 
BigLittlejohn

BigLittlejohn

Well-Known Member
We are still friends Amos but your initial post really disappointed me and contained a ton of mis information. There is no doubt we have a disconnect on this issue. I still think you are at your core a good person but are missing some much needed historical context and perspective. For example, BLM did not begin with Michael Brown as that clown Milwaukee sherrif goes around promoting on Fox.
 
greencropper

greencropper

Well-Known Member
Odin* said:
They're trained to use their gun with lethal intent in situations where their lives, or those of civilians, are in danger. Failure to "end" the threat in such a situation could prove fatal to the officers or bystanders.

The abuse of power is the issue (as you suggested), "tests" can't really "weed out" the idiots. No one is going to admit that they have deep rooted psychological issues/inferiority complexes during a psych eval. We know this all too well, it's a ubiquitous trope; those who seek power/authority over others are, in general, the least deserving. There are some good cops, just men doing their job, the others, not so much.

Give power/authority (and a gun) to people less than righteous and constantly expose them to people that have severe issues with authority (especially authority granted by a badge and a gun). It's a recipe for disaster.
Click to expand...
yes they are trained to use lethal force in situations that do not require lethal force...does a guy who has a broken bottle deserve to be shot dead when refusing to give in to police demands to drop his weapon? imo he does not, why not put some bullets in his legs then smash the bottle out of his hand with a baton? if he hasnt already dropped the bottle being to busy with the pain in his legs, seen it time after time dude in a remote place(not in public place where a danger to people) armed with knife(not gun) surrounded by police who could easily shoot the legs but yet kill shot, very rare to see instance of police aiming for legs instead of kill shot in the above mentioned scenarios
 
Amos Otis

Amos Otis

Well-Known Member
akhiymjames said:
@Amos Otis please go watch the video from his wife she sold it to New York Times its on the home page. There ain't no gun by his feet like they supposedly show in pics

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/24/us/charlotte-keith-scott-shooting-video.html?_r=0
Click to expand...
I went there. Here's what the N Y Times says in that very article:
"
But the video, which was given to The New York Times by lawyers for the family Friday, does not include a view of the shooting itself. Nor does it answer the crucial question of whether Mr. Scott had a gun, as the police have maintained.

One of the lawyers, Justin Bamberg, who is representing the family along with Eduardo Curry, said in an interview Friday that the video did not prove whether the shooting was justified or not. Rather, he said, it offered “another vantage point” of the incident."

BigLittlejohn said:
We are still friends Amos but your initial post really disappointed me and contained a ton of mis information. There is no doubt we have a disconnect on this issue. I still think you are at your core a good person but are missing some much needed historical context and perspective. For example, BLM did not begin with Michael Brown as that clown Milwaukee sherrif goes around promoting on Fox.
Click to expand...
Where did the rallying cry "hands up, don't shoot" come from? In your opinion, did Michael Brown say that?

Thanks, amigo, for giving my "core" a pass. :eyesmoke:
 
BigLittlejohn

BigLittlejohn

Well-Known Member
As to my statement about calling the cops you are free to believe whateve you wish, but I know how I live my life. I would never call the police for help because I don't believe they exist to protect or help me. Simple as that.

In an either or, which was how I framed the point, I value life over property, including my house. I can be made whole if I lose my house, not so much with my life. That doesnt mean I at all condone what happened to that woman. In Baltimore they protected the local businesses and burned cvs. Don't condone that eithet but I certainly understand it.
 
Amos Otis

Amos Otis

Well-Known Member
greencropper said:
yes they are trained to use lethal force in situations that do not require lethal force...does a guy who has a broken bottle deserve to be shot dead when refusing to give in to police demands to drop his weapon? imo he does not, why not put some bullets in his legs then smash the bottle out of his hand with a baton? if he hasnt already dropped the bottle being to busy with the pain in his legs, seen it time after time dude in a remote place(not in public place where a danger to people) armed with knife(not gun) surrounded by police who could easily shoot the legs but yet kill shot, very rare to see instance of police aiming for legs instead of kill shot in the above mentioned scenarios
Click to expand...
If he simply follows instructions, as is the law, the problem is ended. Isn't it?
 
BigLittlejohn

BigLittlejohn

Well-Known Member
Lets not talk Michael Brown. Lets talk John Crawford (ignored by media) around same time as Brown.

And for the record, I never bought the feds conclusion in the Michael Brown case but agree that issue is far less clear cut than others, like the aforementioned John Crawford.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top