IndaGrow Lights

Is anyone familiar with IndaGrow Lighting, just curios how well they work for flowering

There's lots about them around on these sights. They are OK at best........yields will suffer quite a bit since they don't penetrate deep down under the canopy. I think the biggest complaint is they are expensive too. Good for less heat, and they last a long time......but not much else. Maybe fine for just a few plants in a small area though.

SSHZ said:

There's lots about them around on these sights. They are OK at best........yields will suffer quite a bit since they don't penetrate deep down under the canopy. I think the biggest complaint is they are expensive too. Good for less heat, and they last a long time......but not much else. Maybe fine for just a few plants in a small area though.

Click to expand...

It's obvious from your post that you know nothing about indagro induction lights and have not read any of the grows done here with them.

Oh really?????

Give this thread and about 50 others a thorough review and then report back. I did research on these when they were advertising in High Times last year and decided against them based on numerous AVERAGE at best reviews.

https://www.rollitup.org/led-other-...on-lights-newest-supposedly-technology-3.html

SSHZ said:

Oh really?????

Give this thread and about 50 others a thorough review and then report back. I did research on these when they were advertising in High Times last year and decided against them based on numerous AVERAGE at best reviews.

https://www.rollitup.org/led-other-...on-lights-newest-supposedly-technology-3.html

Click to expand...

So your going to point me to a thread that I posted in and was a part of to prove I don't know what I'm talking about,did you read the whole thing?

Here you go,a video posted the other day from a new indagro user that wasted his money on a light that can't grow shit.

https://www.rollitup.org/led-other-...fficiency-lighting-garden-20.html#post9559870

Hey SSHZ! If I understand your comment correctly you've never ran an Inda-Gro in one of your gardens. Your opinion is based on research you've done which included reading an advertisement in High Times from a year ago which led you to decided against using them. When it comes to what goes in your garden to each his own but to claim these lights can produce, at best, average crops tells me you could have done a bit more research into them.

Even some of the more sativa varieties that usually require HID lights or the sun itself to create dense flowers are filling in nicely under the Inda-Gro.

Click to expand...

Week 7 update: http://bigbudsmag.com/grow/gear/article/expert-test-inda-gro-induction-lighting-flowering-week-seven

and one of my favorites: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=561019447283693&set=vb.262974713805120&type=3&theater

Some of the healthiest plants I have ever grown were under my Inda-gro lamps.
I have 2 200 watt lamps. I use each one over about a 32"x32" area.
Besides the massive buds they grew the thing that impressed me the most was how green and vibrant the lower half of the plants were. (plants were about 30" tall)
The lower parts were not even in the direct light, but it did not seem to matter.
The plants were grown DWC w/Dynagro bloom/silica/magpro combo at less than half strength.
Although I use mostly LED now, I will incorporate the Indys to add some warmth this winter.

This is my second grow with an inda gro and I must say sshz your claims of a meager harvest are unfounded. this is a pic of some space bomb that I am intending to flower. Oh and you can not imagine how hard I laughed when you used that thread on captain lol. Guess its back to the boards for ya to try and find some thread that supports your claims of a bad harvest.

You may have been confusing peoples comments saying you need to get good at canopy management, while it helps up your harvest for sure to make a flat canopy it is not all together necessary if that doesn't fit your style of growing, I did not get them as spread out on the first one as I would have liked to, but I still saw my best harvest yet, and they were just encrusted with resin (might have something to do with the uvb inda's have). Heres a pic of my NYPD to show ya what I mean. Hope you do not think I am being hostile but results speak for themselves, Keep it green and have a dank day.

Induction lights are my current daisy
I dont know much about Inda grow.
But my cheep 400 Riant induction floro has grown great for me....


Autos....
Dina fem Auto Haze






Blue Hymalayn




NYCD auto an NYCD x Mazari auto
Thats a tall boy 16oz keysone can....



Group hug

I think for personal supply, LED or induction are the way to go. They require some capital indeed. But your first yield when done at street value covers it. I started with CFL but such a pain to keep right on the canopy during flower. Just harvested my first LED and happy based on what I did. I have four 12-12 from seed experiments that are budding up nicely right now and then will do first bonafide grow.

HID is the way to go for low start and max yield. But that doesn't make them the best choice for all.

I am a certified pothead. I have only one tent with a couple small cabs for seedling and early veg but not a true perpetual grow. I estimate that with three plants at a time under my led (or cfl really), I will be sitting on an excess half pound or so annually. I plan to give it away freely and happily at an annual out of town party I attend

SSHZ said:

There's lots about them around on these sights. They are OK at best........yields will suffer quite a bit since they don't penetrate deep down under the canopy. I think the biggest complaint is they are expensive too. Good for less heat, and they last a long time......but not much else. Maybe fine for just a few plants in a small area though.

Click to expand...

You on the hate train too? Bet your power bill makes you grouchy I can vouch for these lights I am running 3 of them 2 420's and 1 200.....my thouie(s) not good for growing? How would you know?