injunction/court case updates
- Thread starter doingdishes
- Start date
Top of Page 22 I know you're to lazy to read the whole thing
http://www.cfpc.ca/uploadedFiles/Re...nnabis for Chronic Pain or Anxiety.pdf#page20
now that is gay. how do they get to control such dumb shit? no reall mj is under 15%
elections cant come fast enough , then to take a yr to change and get going again
spider9
Well-Known Member
yes if under the MMAR injunction nothing changes but also for now you can not change any thing on your pink slip amount or address
Joint Monster
Well-Known Member
Is that not unconstitutional? To say I can not change the amount of medicine which i need?... I mean, people NEED to do this with every other medicine on a regular basis.
The Hippy
Well-Known Member
Very good point. I'd be more comfortable if he would have allowed these changes. Makes me nervous. Maybe he's thinking that there is no means to do this at the moment...hoping...
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
this is why i filed as well. i am hoping that our argument will be the one that allows changes! fingers crossed. i think I will be heard in the fall...unfortunately
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
WHATFG
Well-Known Member
I'm going to swallow really hard and say that conroy dropped the ball on this one as well as anyone that let their pinks expire. Phelan did not sound amused....ugh...
So does this mean that Phealans' decision ends or continues the injunction and would an appeal by either side keep the injunction in place?
So does this mean that Phealans' decision ends or continues the injunction and would an appeal by either side keep the injunction in place?
realmeduser
Well-Known Member
i take it to mean that the injunction is still in effect exactly the same as before, applying to the same people as before. upon his final decision, it seems like we can be heard again (probably to get time to wind our grow down after we lose).
I am starting to think I should join up with the goldstars.....
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
starting to think? it will only cost $2. i would suggest it.
the injunction stays as is...sadly. Phelan said there wasn't really anything new so Manson was right.
i keep saying it but he should have stayed at the Supreme level. he asked an equal judge to over rule...that doesn't bode well. if he stayed at the Supreme, there wouldn't be a problem over ruling the lower judge
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
Conroy mentioned 5 years on the video with Wilcox for new people...that's a drag! it's tough enough to convince them they messed up and cut a bunch of us out but then the Failin' Phelan say it was "carefully crafted"...so we were screwed on purpose!
Do goldstars and buy a stamp and fill this out http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/alt_formats/hecs-sesc/pdf/substancontrol/exemptions/scientific-eng.pdf as you want study marijuana scientifically using yourself as the only participant in the study. Everyone should do the same and flood them with applications. Fuckin goofs
You got that fuckin right!no one will be convicted in the mean time
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
that is a good idea...i think I'll try it..haha. nothing to lose. i am at "NO" right now so the worst I will get is to stay the same
Similar threads
