Rottedroots
Well-Known Member
I'm not wearing any underwear..
I started laughing hysterically when I thought of 7,200 lumens (Assuming you run VHO) behind glass, which snatches 15% out of the gate. Thank you for the HYSTERICAL VISUAL! +Rep. Enjoy your 5,000 lumen weed. Hey, if it's all you can do, GROW FOR IT! But at least be aware.In side-by-side testing, the MH/HPS is more efficient than an equal amount of watts of CFL lighting when it comes to grams produced to watts used.
In a light, the electricity that doesn't get turned into light gets turned into HEAT. 400 watts of CFLs produces more heat than one 400-watt HPS.
To grow comparable yields, you generally require roughly twice the wattage in CFLs that you do in HPS. So double the heat. And the electricity.
Don't forget to add in the amount of electricity required to remove that heat.
A large portion of a HID light's heat comes from the ballasts. Most MH/HPS setups have a remote ballast on a nice long cord. You can simply set it outside of the grow room. Most CFL bulbs have their ballasts built in. Therefore, the heat from their ballasts is in the grow room.
Another significant portion of the heat produced by a light comes from the bulb itself. There are a plethora of air-cooled hoods available for a MH/ HPS light. I have yet to see an air-cooled hood for CFL bulbs.
With an air-cooled hood, one can remove the heat produced by the bulb. One can run a duct from outside the grow room, through the light, through another duct, and blow it somewhere else with a fan.
Additionally, a "sealed" air-cooled hood might just lower your grow room temperatures enough that you do not have to vent the grow room itself. Then you could add supplemental CO2 without having it be constantly removed by an exhaust fan. Even if one had to vent a few minutes out of each hour it would require FAR less CO2.
OK, I'd run one of those in a small cab. But I wouldn't trust it at 2 feet!
the other reason I went the 105w cfl route was the $15.00 (at cost price) tag per bulb. =) Im pushing 27000 lumens for 75 bux.Not bad, but the price still needs to come down. If the CFLs can hit 16k lumens for $60 or less then they might be worth using in even larger grows.
Well, that's about half the lumens for half the price of a 400w HPS, you're still not going to have the penetrating power at the leaves though even if you doubled it up.the other reason I went the 105w cfl route was the $15.00 (at cost price) tag per bulb. =) Im pushing 27000 lumens for 75 bux.
Not a single reference to this myth that "lumens are not additive" has come to light or any examples, demonstrations etc. Every source I personally have come upon has stated that lumen DO add. Soooooo.... wtf are you guys babbling on about how 5 5000lm bulbs will only make 5000lm ? There is a STICKIE FOR THIS SITE SHOWING THE FACTS: https://www.rollitup.org/indoor-growing/83128-lumens-lux-adding-all-up.html,No, you aren't.
Not a single reference to this myth that "lumens are not additive" has come to light or any examples, demonstrations etc. Every source I personally have come upon has stated that lumen DO add. Soooooo.... wtf are you guys babbling on about how 5 5000lm bulbs will only make 5000lm ? There is a STICKIE FOR THIS SITE SHOWING THE FACTS: https://www.rollitup.org/indoor-growing/83128-lumens-lux-adding-all-up.html,No, you aren't.