Is Biden really that bad?

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
Drop That Sound said:
Biden administration sued for allegedly hiding documents on baby formula investigation

Biden administration sued for allegedly hiding documents on baby formula investigation - Washington Examiner

EXCLUSIVE — President Joe Biden's Federal Trade Commission is being sued for allegedly blocking the release of records related to its investigation of the nationwide baby formula shortage. The Functional Government Initiative, an ethics watchdog, sent a Freedom of Information Act request in...
www.washingtonexaminer.com www.washingtonexaminer.com
Click to expand...
Facebook Instagram portal for executive to request what news stories and content gets censored:

Funny, wast the FCC threatening to break FB up all the while DHS is asking for 1A "favors" on the backside? What a huge coincidence.
 
BudmanTX

BudmanTX

Well-Known Member
ActionianJacksonian said:
The hell it don't. Biden is about to windfall tax the oil companies for their "record profits" but there's no buyer for this one. First clue.

Why would anyone invest in a refinery when admin is waging war on hydrocarbons. Takes 10 years to see a return on a refinery.
Click to expand...
So your worried about a company that made 18 billion dollars getting taxed hard...

Maybe that same company can reinvest they're earnings in this refinery..ask them

Or maybe asked all the companies that made 100 billion to invest,

Maybe u don't realize they made all this money off of us....the consumer
 
PJ Diaz

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
Washington Examiner

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Washington Examiner - Bias and Credibility

RIGHT BIAS These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may
mediabiasfactcheck.com mediabiasfactcheck.com
Click to expand...
But CNN is OK, right? I mean left..

mediabiasfactcheck.com

CNN - Bias and Credibility

LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording
mediabiasfactcheck.com mediabiasfactcheck.com

Screenshot - 2022-11-02T180540.554.png
 
A

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
BudmanTX said:
So your worried about a company that made 18 billion dollars getting taxed hard...

Maybe that same company can reinvest they're earnings in this refinery..ask them

Or maybe asked all the companies that made 100 billion to invest,

Maybe u don't realize they made all this money off of us....the consumer
Click to expand...
I mostly ride a single cylinder motorcycle so I didn't contribute much.

Record prices lead to record profits? No way!

Why is wholesale inflation always higher than retail as of late if these companies aren't trying to absorb some of your costs?
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
PJ Diaz said:
But CNN is OK, right? I mean left..

mediabiasfactcheck.com

CNN - Bias and Credibility

LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording
mediabiasfactcheck.com mediabiasfactcheck.com

View attachment 5221137
Click to expand...
CNN’s left bias is history. It got purchased by a rightie with editorial ambitions.

www.vox.com

Billionaire John Malone loves Fox News. But he owns a piece of CNN.

One of the world’s most powerful news outlets has a new mandate.
www.vox.com www.vox.com
 
PJ Diaz

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
CNN’s left bias is history. It got purchased by a rightie with editorial ambitions.

www.vox.com

Billionaire John Malone loves Fox News. But he owns a piece of CNN.

One of the world’s most powerful news outlets has a new mandate.
www.vox.com www.vox.com
Click to expand...
Perhaps, but you didn't seem to have any issue considering CNN articles to be generally true and newsworthy in the past few years. I mean, I haven't seen you previously stamp them as "left-leaning" in an attempt to tacitly discredit their newsworthiness, the way you just did with the Examiner.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
PJ Diaz said:
Perhaps, but you didn't seem to have any issue considering CNN articles to be generally true and newsworthy in the past few years. I mean, I haven't seen you previously stamp them as "left-leaning" in an attempt to tacitly discredit their newsworthiness, the way you just did with the Examiner.
Click to expand...
You are not acknowledging the basic asymmetry that has developed. Center and left sources are in the noise floor of the usual drizzle of inaccuracies. The right press has organized behind a shield wall of now-familiar lies. Your both-sidesing is a sly denial of this situation.
 
PJ Diaz

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
You are not acknowledging the basic asymmetry that has developed. Center and left sources are in the noise floor of the usual drizzle of inaccuracies. The right press has organized behind a shield wall of now-familiar lies. Your both-sidesing is a sly denial of this situation.
Click to expand...
Regardless, your attempts at dismissing the newsworthiness of articles based simply on publication association shows a lack of care in actually considering the information presented. Unfortunately yes, both sides are guilty of perpetrating propaganda in efforts to fuel their agenda. That's an acknowledgement, not a denial. Your strategy in this plot is much akin to that of Kikazaru and Mizaru.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
PJ Diaz said:
Regardless, your attempts at dismissing the newsworthiness of articles based simply on publication association shows a lack of care in actually considering the information presented. Unfortunately yes, both sides are guilty of perpetrating propaganda in efforts to fuel their agenda. That's an acknowledgement, not a denial. Your strategy in this plot is much akin to that of Kikazaru and Mizaru.
Click to expand...
What you obfuscate is that one side is committing far more numerous and far more severe dishonesties than the other.
 
PJ Diaz

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
What you obfuscate is that one side is committing far more numerous and far more severe dishonesties than the other.
Click to expand...
What do you think the ratio is, 2:1?

In fact, I'm not obfuscating it at all. My only point, was that you can not tacitly dismiss information simply based upon association, yet you seem to do it as one on your standard defense mechanisms quite regularly. If anything you are contorting that point, in an effort to shine the light away from it and onto something which keeps you on the offense. This isn't ping pong however. At some point you have to catch the ball and own it.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
PJ Diaz said:
What do you think the ratio is, 2:1?

In fact, I'm not obfuscating it at all. My only point, was that you can not tacitly dismiss information simply based upon association, yet you seem to do it as one on your standard defense mechanisms quite regularly. If anything you are contorting that point, in an effort to shine the light away from it and onto something which keeps you on the offense. This isn't ping pong however. At some point you have to catch the ball and own it.
Click to expand...
2:1 using what as the dimension? Pseudoquantitative argument
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top