January 6th, 2021

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
wait a minute..SCOTUS gets political donations or is it from themselves? i have a family in mind i just can't think of their name. very religious from the midwest the female seems to be in charge; not DeVos not the Waltons. i can picture her; it;s killing me..i'll get it later unless someone else comes up with it.
No. I mean that the court is unlikely to change the opaque funding law that allowed this massive slug of money go to that mobster.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
a whole lot of sacks just became closer to thee..5 YEARS!

1639824382211.png

i hope those that we refer for Contempt of Congress decide to show. we're not letting this happen again with any president.
 
Last edited:

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Judge Chutkan Imposes Stiffest Sentence Yet on Trump Foot Soldier Who Attacked the Capitol on 1/6

District of Columbia Federal Court Judge Tanya Chutkan sentenced defendant Robert Palmer, 54, of Tampa, to more than five years in prison for his role in the attack the US Capitol.

Judge Chutkan's comments at sentencing conjured up notions of two federal statutes we have yet to see used by federal prosecutors: insurrection and seditious conspiracy. Here are the elements of those two federal crimes, which we may see make an appearance in future indictments.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Trump-Appointed Judges Rule Out Comparisons Between Jan. 6, Portland
Two judges appointed by former President Donald Trump are rejecting claims being made by Jan. 6 defendants that they are being treated more unfairly because of their conservative views than how left-leaning protesters from the 2020 riots in Portland, Oregon, had been handled.

Federal Judge Trevor McFadden, a judge on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, on Tuesday said the Jan. 6 defendants didn't have enough evidence that shows discrimination, reports CNN.

Last week, Judge Carl Nichols, also appointed to the federal court in D.C. by Trump, made a similar ruling.

In McFadden's ruling, Jan. 6 defendant David Lee Judd had asked that the judge examine Justice Department records about prosecution decisions in the Portland cases, and claimed that he had been treated unfairly compared to those cases.

But McFadden said on Tuesday that the riots in Portland did not risk the same threats to safety as the Jan. 6 protests at the Capitol posed, even though federal buildings were attacked in both cases.

"The Portland defendants primarily attacked at night, meaning that they raged against a largely vacant courthouse," McFadden wrote in his ruling. "In contrast, the January 6 rioters attacked the Capitol in broad daylight. And many entered it. ... Their actions endangered hundreds of federal officials in the Capitol complex. Members of Congress cowered under chairs while staffers blockaded themselves in offices, fearing physical attacks from the rioters."

Meanwhile, Nichols, who is presiding over the case of Jan. 6 defendant Garrett Miller, said last week that there were "obvious differences" between the protests in Portland and at the U.S. Capitol, and ruled, like McFadden, that the D.C. protests had put hundreds of government officials in danger.

"The Portland rioters' conduct, while obviously serious, did not target a proceeding prescribed by the Constitution and established to ensure a peaceful transition of power," Nichols wrote in his decision. "Nor did the Portland rioters, unlike those who assailed America's Capitol in 2021, make it past the buildings' outer defenses."

However, McFadden criticized the DOJ for dropping cases in Oregon through decisions that were made while Trump was still in office and after President Joe Biden took over in January, and called the department's actions "suspicious."

Seems this has the Newsmax crew up in arms. "3600 Comments"
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
as an American knowing that team was there and that if the door where the Trumper was shot to death breached; they were there to take action.

it's too bad they coudn't save us the trouble and set their sights one mile away on the stage at the Ellipse..or the WH dining room where he sat and watched for hours..bullets ricochet all the time.

he already lost the election..no harm; no foul.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Boy are these people gonna be pissed when Donald goes down and his henchmen are convicted. They will love the 1/6 hearings and all those convictions in the courts. Disinformation caused delusion of people who want to believe, talk about confirmation bias! Most of these people are racists morons and some are clearly not playing with a full deck.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
We will see what Garland has to say tomorrow, it had better be good and he better be doing more than watching from the sidelines while busting morons and suckers. He had better be investigating and collecting evidence too, we don't need to know the details, just that he is taking it and his job as AG seriously and will defend the constitution and enforce the rule of law. Congress is doing it's job, let's see if the DOJ and FBI are doing theirs when it comes to the organizers, planners and pay masters. By now they should have obtained warrants and have every one of the fuckers wired for sound and their phones bugged, they have plenty of probable cause and it would be entirely appropriate.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Top