Just to be clear....
- Thread starter bde0001
- Start date
nontheist
Well-Known Member
They're going after the guns that have the smallest homicide rate cause they look scary.
blacksun
New Member
No, "assault weapons", which includes assault rifles + "more".
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so are you saying we should go after other guns instead? or would that be unconstitutional?
nontheist
Well-Known Member
Constitutionality is questioned in both scenarios but at least one makes sense. This is a prime example of half truths and misdirection. A law that will almost have no impact but it gives the idiots something to feel better about.
Figong
Well-Known Member
Class 3 can own mortars, grenade launchers, missile launchers, and a few other 'dangerous' weapons.. so no, there is no complaint - if you can afford the Class 3, you can buy said items.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so the constitution is great when it comes to you keeping your guns but it's bad if it makes a mexican couple's kid an american citizen?
by taking the bait, you proved yourself dumber than most fish.
nontheist
Well-Known Member
so the constitution is great when it comes to you keeping your guns but it's bad if it makes a mexican couple's kid an american citizen?
by taking the bait, you proved yourself dumber than most fish.
...............*nod*
If want to post dumb shit please keep it on the appropriate thread. You are a sore loser
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that's funny, i don't feel sore.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Assault rifles were banned long ago. Now they're going after "assault weapons". Tho the term has no legal definition, they are seeking to include any firearm, or any part of a firearm that has any "military" characteristic. You know, a magazine holding more than 30, 20, 10, 8, 7, 3, or 1 rounds (you pick, the number seems to vary), or a removable magazine, or has a trigger, or a handle, or a sight, or a barrel, or uses pre-manufactured ammunition, or just "looks scarey". So yeah, they're coming after your shotgun and pistol. Just give em time.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
7 rounds in NY
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
no one's talking about confiscating anyone's guns, you liar. any ban would be a ban on future sales.
the sky didn't fall in 1994, and it won't this time if they even manage a ban.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
"these" will be just today's restrictions, once they said it was only automatic weapons. Give them an inch, and they will take a mile.
nontheist
Well-Known Member
Easy red, they're going to try* the likeliness of success is grim. They can't even muster enough democrat votes in the senate and the house is fucking laughing at them for even trying.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
It's not just the prohibitive fees, you must also be "approved".
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
approval is required because we don't want certain weapons in the hands of unstable people who talk about their dead wives and dead kids and 7 year old kids that they would rape and classrooms of college kids that they would kill.
