Yields and Ease of Trim
[TABLE="class: grid, width: 847"]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
Subject[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
Yield[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
Rank
(%of.total)[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
Comments[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
Ease of Trim
(10-Easiest, 1-Most difficult)[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
Rank[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
CK[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]18g[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]6
(7.75%)[/TD]
[TD="align: left"]
- Longer veg and better positioning/more light would help increase yield and reduce stretch, but still a low yielding strain[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]6.0[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]3[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
KKI[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]33g[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]5
(14.2%)[/TD]
[TD="align: left"]
-Kosher/Sativa leaning, more leafy than KKII
-Placed in centre to reduce largest anticipated stretch, received most light[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]5.0[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]5[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
KKII[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]49g[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]2
(21.1%)[/TD]
[TD="align: left"]
-Easiest of all samples to trim
-Received most light, best position[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]7.0[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]1[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
HGI[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]51g[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]1
(22.0%)[/TD]
[TD="align: left"]
-Kosher/Sativa leaning, a little more leafy than HGII
-Highest yielding and slightly difficult to trim[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]6.0[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]4[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
HGII[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]38g[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]4
(16.4%)[/TD]
[TD="align: left"]
-More Og18/indica leaning than to HG1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]6.5[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]2[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
TB[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]43g[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]3
(18.5%)[/TD]
[TD="align: left"]
-Originally thought La dom, but definitely X18 leaning, needed more veg
-Very leafy and more difficult to trim than expected[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]4.5[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]6[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
Total[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
232g[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]-
(100%)[/TD]
[TD="align: left"]
The goal was 8-10oz, so barely hit the target, but the most important, prevailing factor is still to be determined; quality/potency[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2, align: center"]-[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Note- Yields do not include preliminary samples tested, which should more than offset any percentage to be lost during the curing process
Light/Subject Layout
-Total enclosed space 26 in x72 in
-Space used for subjects 26 in(0.66m) x 42 in(1.07m)
-Surface area: 0.70 m[SUP]2[/SUP]
-(1) 400W HPS, (4) 23W Cfls (introduced at week 3 flower)
-Acknowledgement that outer subjects, especially CK and TB received less light and worse position
-Ideal positioning was given subjects with greatest anticipated stretch
[--------------- 42 in ---------------]
CFL ......................................................CFL
....HG1.............KK2................CK
[----20 in----] HPS [-----22 in-----]
....HG2.............KK1................TB
CFL.......................................................CFL
Yield Efficiency Data and Ratios
[TABLE="class: grid, width: 500, align: left"]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
Phase[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
Power Used
(W/KW)[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
Hours On (hrs)
{per day/phase}[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
KWH used (KWxH)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
Veg Week 1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]400/
0.4[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]20/
140[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
56.0[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
Veg Week 2[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]400/
0.4[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]18/
126[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
50.4[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
Transition[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]400/
0.4[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]17,16,15,14,13/
75[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
30.0[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
Week 1-2[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]400/
0.4[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]12/
168[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
67.2[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
Week 3-10[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]492/
0.492[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]12/
672[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
330.6[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
Total
(Weighted Average)[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
(452/0.452)[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
1181[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
534.2[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[TABLE="class: grid, width: 271, align: left"]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
Ratio[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
Overall
Results[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
G / W[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
0.51
(232g / 452W)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
G / KWH used[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
0.43
(232g / 534.2)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
G / m[SUP]2[/SUP][/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
331.4
(232g / 0.70)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
Total Expense of Lighting
(@7.5 cents/KWH)[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
$40.06
($0.075 x 534.2)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
Cost / Day[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
$0.45
($40.06 / 89)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
Yield(g)/Day[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
2.61
(232g / 89)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
Cost / G[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
$0.17
($40.06 / 232g)[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[TABLE="class: grid, width: 685, align: left"]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
Sample[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
Actual
Yield[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
Extrapolated
Yield
(Yield x6)[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
Extrapolated
G/ KWH used[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
Extrapolated
G / m[SUP]2[/SUP][/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
Extrapolated
Cost / G[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
Extrapolated
Cost Efficiency [/TD]
[TD="align: center"]
Rank[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
CK[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]18g[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]108g[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]0.20[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]154[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]$0.37[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]46%[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]6[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
KKI[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]33g[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]198g[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]0.372[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]283[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]$0.20[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]85%[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]5[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
KKII[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]49g[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]294g[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]0.55[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]420[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]$0.14[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]125%[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]2[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
HGI[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]51g[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]306g[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]0.57[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]437[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]$0.13[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]131%[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]1[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
HGII[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]38g[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]228g[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]0.43[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]326[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]$0.18[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]97%[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]4[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]
TB[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]43g[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]258g[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]0.48[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]369[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]$0.16[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]110%[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]3[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Note- Extrapolations of data are simplified estimates, and do not account for light positioning, unequal distribution and other variances
Update
-All samples have been painstakingly manicured
-Now: Curing Process/Patience
-Up Next/To Come: Smoke Reports, Wake N Bake Test Results, Summary/Conclusion
